Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/22 20:22:13
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Judgemental Grey Knight Justicar
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/22 20:27:31
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Ship's Officer
|
I'd say TT quality, but it could be much better, the picture doesn't really do it justice I think. I have a lot of models that look gak in photos but ace in real life, so this may be a similar issue.
Either way, it's certainly not the worst model I've ever seen, and the armor seems crisp. The chains could use some work though; they don't have enough shadows.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/22 20:43:08
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Judgemental Grey Knight Justicar
|
Xca|iber wrote:I'd say TT quality, but it could be much better, the picture doesn't really do it justice I think. I have a lot of models that look gak in photos but ace in real life, so this may be a similar issue.
Either way, it's certainly not the worst model I've ever seen, and the armor seems crisp. The chains could use some work though; they don't have enough shadows.
Yep i forget about the chains and painted it after I added the wash.
The armor looking crisp is because the painted I used is like that. Also forgot to wash the model when painting it so the paint is literally falling off.
LOL one guy said Elite pro painted while another said Rubbish. I think both are kinda exagerated LOL its not that good nor is it that rubbish haha.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/06/22 20:44:49
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/22 20:44:57
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Crafty Bray Shaman
|
Ouch, be more careful next time.
And who's the git who said this is rubbish?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/22 21:23:36
Subject: Re:First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Stalwart Space Marine
|
Its definatly not rubbish but I would like to see some better pictures I think the ones you have taken don't really give us a good look at him.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/22 21:24:12
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
I love the fact there are 2 votes for rubbish...
Me Thinks there were some sneaky sausages who voted with their eyes shut ¬¬
|
Grimtuff wrote: GW want the full wrath of their Gestapo to come down on this new fangled Internet and it's free speech.
A Town Called Malus wrote: Draigo is a Mat Ward creation. They don't follow the same rules as everyone else. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/22 21:25:52
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Cog in the Machine
St.Louis,MO
|
I agree i think in these pics it looks TT but could be better with better pics. definatly not rubish and a great first try.
|
1500
750
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/22 21:47:07
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Bounding Dark Angels Assault Marine
|
I voted it at table top. I wouldn't mind facing a whole army painted to this standard and would appreciate you taking the time to paint them.
Now when you list pro painted do you mean real pro painted or Ebay pro painted?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/22 23:37:43
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Happy We Found Our Primarch
|
I like it, I definitely wouldn't mind seeing more armies painted to this standard on the table more often.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/23 08:25:04
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Judgemental Grey Knight Justicar
|
littleboyblues wrote:I voted it at table top. I wouldn't mind facing a whole army painted to this standard and would appreciate you taking the time to paint them.
Now when you list pro painted do you mean real pro painted or Ebay pro painted? 
Elite pro painted is what I cal real pro that can get stand a chance getting into the golden demon award.
Pro painted is what I call ebay pro painted (but some are very nice)
I put them in just for fun because someone likes to vote like that lol.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Bloodhorror wrote:
I love the fact there are 2 votes for rubbish...
Me Thinks there were some sneaky sausages who voted with their eyes shut ¬¬
haha
Automatically Appended Next Post:
voryn15 wrote:I agree i think in these pics it looks TT but could be better with better pics. definatly not rubish and a great first try.
Thank you I will try get my commisar back (from my friend - sold it to him as his centre piece, planning to touch him up when I have more time) because he does look better than coteaz since I actully know what brush to use.
I Painted this using a medium sized brush because thats all I had LOL. It took some serious patience to paint the details lol and I did this in a GW shop using their messed up brush lol.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2011/06/23 08:29:27
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/30 16:54:55
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
|
i think it looks good
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/30 18:23:05
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Roarin' Runtherd
|
I voted TT.
I second every previoud opinion that I too would love to fight an army painted to this standard.
Onto critizism: The handle on the hammer looks a bit flat imho, maybe a wash and some highlights on that and the head on the hammer to make it pop.
Also, the skin looks a bit dark, but perhaps thats just the camera.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/07/02 01:30:17
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
Australia (insert either funny or interesting fact here)
|
I say pro-painted simply because the photos don't do the model justice.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/07/02 06:43:12
Subject: Re:First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Death-Dealing Ultramarine Devastator
|
It would look heaps better if some of the finer details like the knee skulls and the =I= symbols. Aside from that great job!
|
There is no such thing as innocence, only varying levels of guilt. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/07/02 07:52:30
Subject: First very Coteaz, I think he looks table top quality what do you think?
|
 |
Blood Angel Neophyte Undergoing Surgeries
|
I voted tabletop but only because, like my pics, you use a duff camera, i used my phone though. But to be honest it probably looks great in person. And as long as your happy with it who cares?
|
|
|
 |
 |
|