Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

What's Dakka's policy on nude pictures say like an old Renaissance painting or something? I assume posts of porn or a nude pic that are sexual in nature aren't allowed but just want to be sure though,

the rules didn't really say what Dakka's OK with in terms of nudity.

Ask yourself this question. Is it appropriate for the under 16 kids on here, or the guys that come here from work? I wouldnt post anything that has any type of nudity in it just for those in question

The simple answer is no, sans tasteful on models.

The long answer is nooooooooooooooo.

Isnt there a pod cast you should be working on Chowder?

KingCracker wrote:Isnt there a pod cast you should be working on Chowder?

Monday. But I should be on. Just got home from a 6 hour car trip.

So would this be OK then or not?

Cheesecat wrote:

So would this be OK then or not?

Perfectly fine. It's tasteful.

erm noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Cheesecat wrote:

So would this be OK then or not?

...Who the hell did that, and how many hobby painters did they have to behead in single combat before getting that kind of skill?

Littleboyblueeyes I believe is his SN.

Oh...of course MALE nudity is allowed, but if that was a female on that LR, there would be red lights and alarms all over this thread (btw, that pic looks awesome)
Btw, off-topic and these thoughts randomly pop in my head, so don't ask me why I say stuff. Greeks worship the male body as more beautiful than the females.

Was that just Plato though? Am a bit rusty on Greek aesthetics.


My thanks to Google image results for the unerring adherence to finding what I ask for

You know, I have to stop opening threads based on their subject lines.

So nudity is allowed aslong as genitals are covered? ( cant see if thats a penis or not lol )

It is
I think Adam escaped the fig leaf painter after Michaelangelo had finished the Sistine Chapel
A chap was hired for the sole purpose of covering up genetalia on the Last Judgement fresco and was nicknamed "The Breeches Maker" iirc

IMHO it's absolutely fine if the nudity isn't sexual in nature, buf if it is, simply writing NSFW should do. I remember there were no objections to pictures of the BaneLords Rose of Ker-Ys, but things like the Slaanesh Predator with a dildo turret shouldn't be posted, but can be linked if you explicity state what the link is Just use common sense, in other words.

Slaanesh Predator with dildo turret? Awsome.

Not so cool when the batteries run out

LunaHound wrote:So nudity is allowed aslong as genitals are covered? ( cant see if thats a penis or not lol )

It appears to be a boomerang.

This is actually a good question. Keep in mind stuff like this is in the gallery:



I'm not complaining, I have the same model and I'll eventually post some WIP pics of mine, but it's kind of tough to see the line.

Polonius, what model is that?

I'd love to use the arms(assuming the armor style is consistent with the leg armor) and legs in a conversion.

Polonius wrote:This is actually a good question. Keep in mind stuff like this is in the gallery:



I'm not complaining, I have the same model and I'll eventually post some WIP pics of mine, but it's kind of tough to see the line.

Platuan4th wrote:Polonius, what model is that?

I'd love to use the arms(assuming the armor style is consistent with the leg armor) and legs in a conversion.

I would also like to know, as I just find that an awesome model.

It's the ultraforge pleasure demon.

http://www.thewarstore.com/product45588.html

Top notch quality of both sculpting and casting.

Chowderhead wrote:

Cheesecat wrote:

So would this be OK then or not?

Perfectly fine. It's tasteful.

And rather flacid

Adam has just been created, he isn't meant to be aroused at this point. That comes later after the fall.

Noah suffers the same but because of brewer's droop.

If it's behind a link or a spoiler tag and clearly labelled as NSFW I can't imagine there'd be too much fuss.

Nudity isnt anything we havent seen before. In my opinion, anything that isnt actually porn should be totally fine on here. The Mods, however, may have a different opinion.

The Dreadnote wrote:If it's behind a link or a spoiler tag and clearly labelled as NSFW I can't imagine there'd be too much fuss.

That's probably the safest way.

I certainly appreciate a NSFW tag when I'm browsing at work, and a spoiler tag gives someone the option to look or not look.

kronk wrote:

The Dreadnote wrote:If it's behind a link or a spoiler tag and clearly labelled as NSFW I can't imagine there'd be too much fuss.

That's probably the safest way.

I certainly appreciate a NSFW tag when I'm browsing at work, and a spoiler tag gives someone the option to look or not look.

I agree, posting an image with NSFW and spoiler tags make it the viewers/users responsibility as to weather they wish to open the image or not, it would seem to me to be a happy medium...but then again...I don't make decisions around here.

If there's nudity and it isn't wargaming related, it really shouldn't be on Dakka.

If there's nudity and it is wargaming related, it should be either spoiled or linked and labeled as NSFW in the thread title and before the spoiler/link.