Switch Theme:

Will I feel bad using blue Iron hands?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




NE Ohio, USA

A {simple} fix to this that'd avoid re-costing everything over 4+ codices would be to simply attach a single points value to running a sub-faction.

They already have this going on over in AoS with the various War Scroll battalions.
For those not fluent in AoS, War scroll Battalions specify that they're comprised of x units & then give one or more bonuses to those units. Each WSB has a set pts value. some more expensive than others.
For example; My Brass Stampede (from Blades of Khorne) costs 140 pts, consists of 0-1 Lord of Khorne on a Juggernaut & 3 - 7 units of Mighty Skullcrushers. Their Murderous Charge gets upgraded to Obliterating Charge.

They could {easily} adapt this to 40k.
Space Marine detachment list using only the base codex - pts as listed.
Make them:
Ultra-Marines for +x pts/Power Lv
White scars for _____ pts/Power Lv
Ravenguard for _____ pts/Power Lv
Iron Hands for _____ pts/Power Lv
Salamanders for _____ pts/Power Lv
Imperial Fists for _____ pts/Power Lv
* List a few things each of these MUST include in order to present the flavor of the force.
* Some of these Chapters will end up being more expensive than others....
* Give a discounted price if the force is a successor chapter as those won't have access to the named characters/possibly some wargear or relics of their parent chapter.
** Dark angels/Blood Angels/Space Wolves/Grey Knights - pts as listed in their respective codices as these guys differ significantly.
   
Made in gb
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar





Klickor wrote:Its not just marginaly more effective in the current edition. Taking a vehicle heavy BA list compared to a IH version of the same list. Sure we both have vehicles but one is able to make the vehicles work while the other player tries. The playstyle just doesnt work for BA if you actually want to have a fair game. We could probably make some mirror lists that the IH version would have an above 95% win rate against the exact same BA list. Can you really say BA plays that playstyle then? It tries but thats about it. It should be able to and I have used vehicles with my BA in earlier editions quite well but they really suck right now. But back then the difference was also minimal between the same units from different chapters. Now not every chapter can do multiple roles well anymore so better just see the different rules as different doctrines they all know but certain chapters favor.
Favour, yes, but it's not like you can't have a vehicle-heavy list at all. For me, playstyle largely comes down to basic demographics, largely like how the 30k Rites of War are organised, and as a result, no, I don't think that Chapter Tactics should be a factor in "I want to play this style of list", because you could just mirror match, as you say.

Maybe they'll be a percentage more powerful, but I personally would rather be playing my army how they're painted instead of what will make them stronger. I'm not going to pretend that what I'd do is the "right" way, or that the other is the "wrong" way, but if there's that kind of ideological difference in what we want from the game, we probably shouldn't play together, in all respect and amiability.

BrianDavion wrote:TBH it'd be one thing if Ultramarines rules where just paints on head bad (it's hard to blame word bearers players from using a differant CT) but Ultramarines are one of the best Marine chapters out there. so using Iron Hands instead in this case is going to come off as a little bit of power gaming yeah.
In all fairness, you do have a point on that. The fact that they're switching out to what's considered a more powerful Chapter is a large factor in this.

It's not to say that I'd be completely totally fine with clearly marked 'Ultramarines' playing as a hypothetically 'worse' Chapter (let's just say White Scars, just for the sake of discussion), but at least they're not doing it to chase the meta. It's mostly the meta chasing I wish to avoid (completely as a personal preference, not going to say that it's wrong or bad), so someone switching to what's considered the Flavour of the Month just feels like their priority is "I want to win with my models" instead of "I want to play with my models", which would be a clash with my own.


They/them

 
   
Made in de
Longtime Dakkanaut





@OP:
Forge my own narrative? If it smells like a troll post, it usually is.

A bunch of smurfs are a bad excuse for the grim Iron Hands. Nuff said.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: