Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 05:28:49
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
|
I was wondering if there was a way that the title of the 40k Army Lists sub forum could be standardized? It would help immensely in the searching of different threads and posts. It would also make looking at the thread list a lot better.
Possibly something like the following
Blood Angels - 1000 Pts. - Jumpers?
Basically:
[Race] - [Points] - [Quick description?]
Maybe a pain to implement, but if it starts, possibly can catch on like in the Swap Shop?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 14:58:21
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I'm certainly in favour of the idea, but it would require dedicated moderators to police, and it is a thankless and dull task to do so. Anyone want to offer some suggestions on the best way to make it work? I can code in a popup message demanding it meets that title structure, but those sorts of popups get ignored with annoying frequency.
|
Check out our new, fully plastic tabletop wargame - Maelstrom's Edge, made by Dakka!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 15:01:38
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
I can't see it working any other way besides however the swap shop works. You could probably add a restriction to the titles, but it'd be way more work than worth and in the end. It'd be easier to get a mod or two and enforce it on new threads rather than existing. Eventually the old will be phased out and the new method adopted.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 15:03:48
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
The problem being, of course, that mods are a finite resource. The fact that we have folks who police the Swap Shop voluntarily is a source of constant amazement. Talk about a thankless task.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 15:07:23
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Wight Lord with the Sword of Kings
|
I would voluntarily check that. Honest, without trolling.
Rather hard for me though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 15:14:37
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Yeah, but then we'd have to promote you to Army List MOD. And as we know, power corrupts.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 15:16:43
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Wight Lord with the Sword of Kings
|
pretre wrote:Yeah, but then we'd have to promote you to Army List MOD. And as we know, power corrupts. 
As a Skaven player, I would never use such an advantage!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 19:01:02
Subject: Re:Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
I wouldn't mind doing it either. Any way I can feed back to Dakka is great (I can't do DCM because of my parents)
|
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 19:33:59
Subject: Re:Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
[SWAP SHOP MOD]
Yvan eht nioj
In my Austin Ambassador Y Reg
|
It's a good idea and I think it has been raised in here in the past but as Lego says, there are some hurdles to overcome, the main one being that even if you do have a dedicated mod to police it, people generally still tend to ignore title formats. We have had quite a strict and unambiguous title format enforced in the Swap Shop for some time now; it is detailed in the posting rules sticky along with illustrations on use and every time I edit someone's thread I include an example of the correct format to use in reply to their thread so they don't even have to read the sticky. And still....
I spend on average 2 hours during the course of the day fixing titles and believe me, it gets boring very quickly. I'm sure the other Swap Mods probably spend a similar amount of time too. Unfortunately, we still have to do it each and every day because people just don't read stickies, they don't read rules threads and posting guidelines, they ignore pop up reminders and most bizarrely, they seem to ignore the fact that just about every other thread in the Swap Shop is formatted along the same guidelines. The same could be said of the new GW Specialist Games and Misc Games sections - both the sticky threads in there ask people to put the name of the game in [ ] brackets in the title so that people can quickly see/search for a specific game and yet hardly anyone does so - and this is in subforums which are new.
I'm sure there are plenty of people willing to volunteer their time to fix thread titles but believe me, most people would quickly become burnt out after doing it for any length of time. Frankly, I get sick of doing it in the Swap Shop but luckily enough, there are other tasks to break the monotony of it. In an ideal world, it would be self-regulating but such a thing just won't happen until people start reading stickies.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 19:36:21
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Yeah, short of having a separate posting page for those forums where the Subject is replaced with several specific fields, I'm not sure how you could get it to work.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 19:36:41
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I'll Mod the gak out of some army list posts.
BOOM: You didn't put in the point totals. Also, Attack Squigs on your Warboss but no Power Klaw? Really? 1 week ban!
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/06 19:39:30
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Is this is like political office? Anyone who wants to do it, shouldn't be allowed to?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/07 08:28:37
Subject: Re:Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Wight Lord with the Sword of Kings
|
4oursword wrote:I wouldn't mind doing it either. Any way I can feed back to Dakka is great (I can't do DCM because of my parents)
Same here bro, same here. Also, even though many wouldn't believe it, I am a fair person when it comes to modding. #shamelessadvert.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/07 08:36:07
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
pretre wrote:Is this is like political office? Anyone who wants to do it, shouldn't be allowed to?
Probably, but you also shouldn't go after the ones that don't want to do it to the point they'd do a lackluster job.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/07 08:57:23
Subject: Re:Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
So anyone who wants to isn't allowed, and anyone who doesn't want to isn't allowed?
That leaves... anyone who doesn't pay attention to the question?
|
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/07 08:59:29
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
Nope, a paradox which creates the energy required to create the entities known as mods.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/07 17:56:02
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Wight Lord with the Sword of Kings
|
n0t_u wrote:Nope, a paradox which creates the energy required to create the entities known as mods.
Dont forget the blood sacrafices!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/07 19:04:15
Subject: Re:Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Om nom nom nom, blood sacrifices
|
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/07 19:09:10
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
While we're at it, I'd love to to see the system tags in News and Rumors while we're at it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/07 23:40:20
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
|
legoburner wrote:I'm certainly in favour of the idea, but it would require dedicated moderators to police, and it is a thankless and dull task to do so. Anyone want to offer some suggestions on the best way to make it work? I can code in a popup message demanding it meets that title structure, but those sorts of popups get ignored with annoying frequency.
True. This would possibly help a bit. Possibly a way to limit the titles? Is there anyway to incorporate what Librarium Online does (the addition of the point level graphic with each thread title)? http://www.librarium-online.com/forums/space-marine-army-lists/ I mean adding Mods to it would help, this could possibly be accomplished through checking whom posts the most in the Army Lists Section, seeing as we can now see the breakdown of our posts, and offering said positions to those individuals. Also I believe it can be offered to a few. I think the Army List Forum gets roughly 20-30 threads a day? So you figure one to two individuals, maybe three to monitor it? It seems that Swap Shop has caught on minus the few offenders.
Possibly a limit on the number of characters in the title may help as well? Possibly add some more listing requirements to thread creation, if possible?
I would also have no problem putting myself in as a regulator, I believe with mature community, such an implementation would not be too difficult. I figure it could be attempted, and worse case scenario abandoned with no harm/no foul.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 19:07:18
Subject: Re:Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Would a multiple-choice menu help? One drop-down for Faction, a box for points value, and then a larger box for a brief description?
|
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 19:15:50
Subject: Re:Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Nigel Stillman
|
4oursword wrote:Would a multiple-choice menu help? One drop-down for Faction, a box for points value, and then a larger box for a brief description?
It would most likely help... but would take quite awhile to code I imagine.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 19:17:19
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
@MadMaverick76: As described above, finding volunteers isn't the problem. Keeping them is. It is a thankless, boring and endless task.
@4oursword: Lego is cursing you right now since that would be coding.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 19:27:16
Subject: Re:Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Nigel Stillman
|
filbert wrote:...I spend on average 2 hours during the course of the day fixing titles...
That’s insane...
Maybe we should make title editing a punishment for rule 1 infractions...
Like you have to fix 50 titles and then turn them into a mod who looks them over and then (if you did good) lifts your quick reply box ban.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 19:27:18
Subject: Re:Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Kid_Kyoto
|
While we're wishlisting, I'd like an enforceable standard template for displaying army lists.
HQ
Captain Scowlypants Fisticus
- Power fists x 4
Troops
Tactical Squad x10
- Shiny Sword
- Water Balloon Launcher
And so on. I know it'll never happen, but I gotta shut my eyes and picture it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 19:28:06
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Wow. Yeah... I'd like free money and world peace. I'm sure Lego can start coding that as well.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 19:33:43
Subject: Re:Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Kid_Kyoto
|
Ha!
I'm picturing it now:
# Dakkacode release 5.38 Changelog:
#
# - fixed obscure bug
# - revamped army lists subforum
# - provides world peace
Totally adding the last line next time I update anything around work, just to see if anyone notices.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 20:39:29
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
pretre wrote: Keeping them is. It is a thankless, boring and endless task. So, it's just like everyday of my life currently.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/08/08 20:41:11
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 20:46:55
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Platuan4th wrote:pretre wrote: Keeping them is. It is a thankless, boring and endless task.
So, it's just like everyday of my life currently. 
/hug/
You're gonna be okay, Platuan4th.
You're gonna be okaaaaayyy.
Say the fethin' words!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/08 22:43:25
Subject: Standardized Title for Army Lists forum
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
pretre wrote:Platuan4th wrote:pretre wrote: Keeping them is. It is a thankless, boring and endless task. So, it's just like everyday of my life currently.  /hug/ You're gonna be okay, Platuan4th. You're gonna be okaaaaayyy. Say the fethin' words! Lol, just meant I do nothing but house work(cleaning, laundry, dishes, etc.) all day since I'm not currently employed.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/08/08 22:45:40
|
|
 |
 |
|