Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:10:01
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego
|
http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/content/article.jsp?categoryId=1000018&pIndex=1&aId=3400019&multiPageMode=true&start=2
several v1.1 ones up...
.. get readin' folks !
Page 49 – Fateweaver, Oracle of Eternity.
Change the first sentence to read “Because of the incredible
prescience of the Oracle of Tzeentch, Fateweaver and all
friendly units chosen from Codex: Chaos Daemons within 6" reroll all failed Armour, Invulnerable and Cover saves.”
ooohhh,,,,,
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/09/07 14:11:39
The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:13:07
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Pestilent Plague Marine with Blight Grenade
|
CHAOS SPACE MARINE DAEMON PRINCES ARE FLYING MONSTROUS CREATURES!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:14:09
Subject: Re:new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego
|
Q: If mindshackle scarabs are used against a model with a force
weapon or a weapon which allows the wielder to inflict Instant Death
with a successful Leadership test, can the Necron player force the enemy
model to utilise this ability? (p81)
A: Yes.
 *shock*
Q: Is there any way to embark back onto a Night Scythe?
A: Yes – follow the rules for Embarking on page 78, treating
the Night Scythe’s base as its Access Point. Note that this is
possible despite the Night Scythe being a Zooming Flyer.
hooray !
|
The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:14:21
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
And that may change in two weeks time. You never know!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:16:26
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Secret Inquisitorial Eldar Xenexecutor
|
Dark Eldar - Page 42 – Shadowseers, Veil of Tears.
Replace the last three sentences with the following: “The
Shadowseer, and all models in her unit, have the Stealth and
Shrouded special rules.”
Finally Automatically Appended Next Post: And Huskblades are AP2, as are Klaives. Hello Termies
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/09/07 14:17:50
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:21:30
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Great catch, reds8n!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:21:43
Subject: Re:new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
Q: If Chaos Daemons are allied to Chaos Space Marines, do they roll
for scatter if Deep Striking within 6" of a Chaos Icon carried by a
Chaos Space Marine model? (p73)
A: If the wording on the Chaos Icon’s description refers to ‘all
friendly units’, then yes. If not, then the Chaos Icon only
affects the specific units referred to in its description.
More or less.
Rest is good, though I think that part will probably have to be FAQed still.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:22:59
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
Woohoo! My Commissars won't execute my Librarians who attach to my blob squads!
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:24:13
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Wraith
|
I see that more as "We don't want to rewrite this in a month" than IDK.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:24:42
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Page 410 – Reference, Profile, Codex: Grey Knights, Paladins. Change unit type to Infantry. Page 411 – Reference, Profile, Codex: Space Wolves, Wolf Guard. Change unit type to Infantry. Page 413 – Reference, Profile, Codex: Orks, Nob. Change unit type to Infantry and add the following Designer’s Note: Page 413 - Reference, Profiles Add the following Designer’s Note:. Designers Note: Wolf Guard, Nobz, Nobz Warbikers, and Crisis Shas’vre that lead a unit (for example an Ork Nob leading Ork Boyz, a Wolf Guard leading Grey Hunters) have the unit type Infantry (Character).
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/09/07 14:25:27
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:25:19
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
Home Base: Prosper, TX (Dallas)
|
This is crazy, they just massively reduced the usefulness of Look out Sir.... This one just makes it easier for people who cant' read to understand: Page 16 – Shooting Phase, Look Out, Sir Delete “(or unsaved Wounds)” from the first paragraph. This is the one that makes look out sir less useful: Page 16 – Shooting Phase, Look Out, Sir Change the second sentence of the second bullet point to: “Determine which model in the unit is closest to the character, and resolve the Wound against that model instead.” And flying Nid MC's are dead....Oh well, fun while it lasted
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/09/07 14:28:54
Best Painted (2015 Adepticon 40k Champs)
They Shall Know Fear - Adepticon 40k TT Champion (2012 & 2013) & 40k TT Best Sport (2014), 40k TT Best Tactician (2015 & 2016) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:25:54
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Page 426 – The Game Summary, Transport Vehicles and Their
Passengers, Explodes (Other Effects).
Change the entry to read “The unit takes a number of Strength
4 AP – hits equal to the number of models in the unit.
Surviving passengers are placed where the vehicle used to be
and must take a Pinning test.”
No more disembark from the summary for Explodes. Automatically Appended Next Post: Here ends the Signum debate:
Q: Can the BS1 of a Snap Shot ever be modified by special rules that
modify the BS of a model’s Shooting attack (such as Tau markerlights,
Space Marine Signums or Sergeant Telion’s Voice of Experience)? (p13)
A: No.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/09/07 14:26:20
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:26:26
Subject: Re:new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego
|
Q: Does the Tempest’s Wrath psychic power affect Flyers? (p37)
A: No.
|
The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:26:56
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Q: How do maelstroms, novas and beams – or indeed any weapon
that doesn’t need to roll To Hit or hits automatically – interact with
Zooming Flyers and Gliding Flying Monstrous Creatures? (p13)
A: Only Snap Shots can hit Zooming Flyers and Gliding
Flying Monstrous Creatures. Therefore, any attacks that use
blast markers, templates, create a line of/area of effect or
otherwise don’t roll to hit cannot target them. This includes
weapons such as the Necron Doom Scythe’s death ray or the
Deathstrike missile of the Imperial Guard, and psychic
powers that follow the rule for maelstroms, beams, and
novas.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:27:11
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Doesn't removing 'Character' from Paladins/Wolf Guard/Nobz Mobs make things a bit more realistic, rather than all of these squad members falling over one another to save each other's lives?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:27:26
Subject: Re:new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
reds8n wrote:Q: Does the Tempest’s Wrath psychic power affect Flyers? (p37)
A: No.
We knew that though. It doesn't say Flyers on it. Did they rule on Njal's stuff?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:28:02
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Incubus
|
Charax wrote:CHAOS SPACE MARINE DAEMON PRINCES ARE FLYING MONSTROUS CREATURES!
This, 1000 times this!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:28:15
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:Doesn't removing 'Character' from Paladins/Wolf Guard/Nobz Mobs make things a bit more realistic, rather than all of these squad members falling over one another to save each other's lives?
Yes, it was silly and we knew it would be FAQ'd. Automatically Appended Next Post: Q: Does a model with an Unwieldy weapon Pile In at its normal
Initiative step and then fight at Initiative step 1? (p22/23)
A: No – it Piles In and fights at Initiative step 1. Automatically Appended Next Post: Q: Can blast markers hit a model that is not in the attacker’s line of
sight if they do NOT scatter? (p33)
A: Yes, as long as the target enemy model for the blast
weapon is within the firer’s line of sight. Automatically Appended Next Post: This is surprisingly comprehensive.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2012/09/07 14:29:17
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:29:26
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
I will note that the starter set rules for Chosen lists them as 'Characters'. With any luck this error won't be in the upcoming Chaos Codex requiring more FAQ'ing.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:29:53
Subject: Re:new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
Thats a poorly written FAQ on MSS. Reason being that the new rules dont simply require a LD test, they require the expenditure of a warp token and then a test. So now the way its written, even if you have no warp tokens left, Necron players will be arguing that MSS can do it without the the need for the token because the faq doesnt say they have to spend a token. My argument would be that since models are required to spend the token, and no model simply makes a LD test (sans GK which may be their only exception), that MSS cannot activate Force weapons on anyone...like I said...poorly written FAQ to MSS...
|
Let a billion souls burn in death than for one soul to bend knee to a false Emperor.....
"I am the punishment of God, had you not committed great sin, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:29:59
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Q: If passengers disembark from a Transport that has suffered a
Shaken or Stunned result, do they still suffer these effects in their
next Shooting phase? (p80)
A: Yes. Automatically Appended Next Post: Q: If a unit disembarks from a destroyed vehicle during the enemy
turn, can it Charge in the Assault phase of its own turn? (p80)
A: No, unless the vehicle in question was an Assault Vehicle.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/09/07 14:30:09
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:31:19
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
Home Base: Prosper, TX (Dallas)
|
It looks pretty good so far, though I'm only on page 2 of the Rulebook FAQ
|
Best Painted (2015 Adepticon 40k Champs)
They Shall Know Fear - Adepticon 40k TT Champion (2012 & 2013) & 40k TT Best Sport (2014), 40k TT Best Tactician (2015 & 2016) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:31:33
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
So it's easier to assault from a Land Raider that's exploding than a Rhino that's exploding. I guess that makes sense***.
***Note: Does not actually make sense.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:31:34
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Q: Can you deploy the Aegis Defence Line sections in two or more
groups of two or more sections apiece (this way, they will still be in
base contact with at least one other section)? (p114)
A: No – the Aegis defence line sections must be deployed in
an unbroken chain, though they can be connected end-toend
such as in the example shown on page 114.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:31:40
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
12thRonin wrote:I see that more as "We don't want to rewrite this in a month" than IDK.
True, hadn't thought of it that way.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:31:58
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Calculating Commissar
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:Doesn't removing 'Character' from Paladins/Wolf Guard/Nobz Mobs make things a bit more realistic, rather than all of these squad members falling over one another to save each other's lives?
Yah, but it was funny to imagine.
Also:
Q: Does a model that uses the Wings of Sanguinius to charge an enemy
unit in the Assault phase gain the Hammer of Wrath special rule?
p(63)
A: Yes.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:32:17
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Oh snap! They make it sound like it is player turn for the tabling thing: Q: If you leave combat airspace with all of your Flyers and have no other models on the gaming board at the beginning of your opponent's turn, do you automatically lose the game? (p122) A: Yes. Q: If all of my units are either Flyers or embarked upon Flyers, will I automatically lose the game as there are none of my models on the gaming board at the end of Turn 1? (p122) A: Yes. Q: Do units that are transported in a vehicle that MUST start in reserve count towards the number of units that can be placed in Reserves? For example, must I count the units in a Drop Pod or Valkyrie towards the 50% of units I can place in Reserves? (p124) A: No.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/09/07 14:32:54
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:32:37
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Calculating Commissar
|
pretre wrote:Q: Can you deploy the Aegis Defence Line sections in two or more
groups of two or more sections apiece (this way, they will still be in
base contact with at least one other section)? (p114)
A: No – the Aegis defence line sections must be deployed in
an unbroken chain, though they can be connected end-toend
such as in the example shown on page 114.
Wow, didn't see that coming...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:33:07
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Q: Which missile launchers have access to flakk missiles? (p57/415)
A: Only those that specifically have an option to take them as
an upgrade in their army list.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/09/07 14:33:26
Subject: new 40k FAQs..
|
 |
Incubus
|
DE Incubi weapons are now AP2 as are Huskblades.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|