Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

OOC: Do people just forget what you say the next moment you open your mouth or something?

OOC: As for idiots and messing up the game.... *glare*

Why self vote? The resoning has stopped? All is being pushed around is how guilty I am and how much you want me gone. Noone's going to slip up and people seem to forget two posts previous these days. So I'm enabling this to keep fresh.

So the the_ferret is L-1?

RustyKnight and Gornall, I suggest you unvote the_ferret for *now* so it stops someone from ending day 1 sooner rather then later.

I'm not voting for him at the moment.

I agree that discussion has stalled. But voting for yourself does nothing.

OOC: Cept last decent discussion was page 16

Its nearing the end of the day, everything has been said. I think we need to decide soon, before the deadline comes. :s

That's what I said!

Then start some. If it helps, I'll even vote for DLS. I'm bending over backwards to try and help you just on the off chance you might be innocent. (OOC:: what I tried to do with DarkO and Game 1.)

If you're innocent, don't give up. Just start putting together some arguments of why you feel so and so is a more likely suspect.

I'm a historian and scientist. All this 'proof' that has been flying around hasn't been proof. Noone knows anything. That said, everyone who's ever said that I may be innocent has actually only lasted one post from someone else before changing their minds. For smoke screens that is a tad worrying.

I think that DLS could be a safe bet for now, most reasoning presented seems solid enough, his lust for blood, the eagerness to kill off Drk_O, something I am not entirely innocent of I was after all one of the few that removed my vote for him last.

VOTE: DLS

Ye Olde Vote Accounting

0 - n0t_u
0 - Vulkan_He'stan
0 - Mekboy
1 - lord of the ghosts (Mekboy )
0 - BrotherStynier
0 - Deff Dread red Edition
0 - Fifty
0 - Emperor's Faithul
0 - Rusty Knight
1 - Drk_O ( Dark Lord Seanron )
7 - the_ferrett (Drk_O Rusty Knight n0t_u ginger_nid_dude Emperor's Faithful Vulkan_He'stan lord of the ghosts )
0 - ginger_nid_dude
0 - Lord-Loss
5 - Dark Lord Seanron (Fifty the_ferrett Lord-Loss Gornall BrotherStynier )
0 - Gornall

0 - No Lynch

Not Voting: Deff Dread red Edition

With 15 alive it is 8 to Lynch
If the deadline were to hit now - the_ferrett would be lynched
Deadline countdown

I'm switching my vote to DLS, primarily because even I have problems thinking a Genestealer would try to kill themselves.

Vote: Dark Lord Seanron

That's put both DLS and ferret at L-2

Vote: DLS

I have overlooked Dark Lord Seanron for too long.

Remember how I said

Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:I'm 99.9% sure the_ferrett is a Genestealer, I will not change my vote until I am 99.91% sure that someone else is.

I'm 99.92% sure DLS is a Genestealer, for some of the reaons mentioned, but mostly because he won't listen to reason or logic.

However, should I wake up tomorrow, I shall be voting for the_ferret again.

Emperors Faithful wrote:

Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:

His vote for Mekboy was explained

the_ferrett wrote:Mekboy. I held off because now that I've said him, he'll join the voting against me club and that brings me closer to the elimination. Why was said in my previous post.

the_ferrett's previous post wrote:Gornall: You drop your vote and I'll tell you who my gut says. Ironically the why is fairly much the same as the rest of you, lack of posts, when they do post its mainly trying to make unrest by fuelling the common vote, that kind of thing.

While I am 100% sure that the_ferret is a Genestealer, please use logic in your arguments. It's usually more convincing.

How is this an explanation?

Last I heard, a 'gut feeling' would only hold up in an Imperial Court if that gut belonged to an inquisitor. And the_ferret is DEFINITELY not an inquisitor, or at least can't have had the opportunity to check anyone out yet.

Last I heard, we weren't in an Imperial Court. So in that respect your logic is misplaced. I put forth the idea that bad explanations =/= no explanations.

There's really no need to to rush over to the Dark Lord Searon bandwagon. The last thing we need is a split vote between DLS and the_ferret, that will just lead to confusion. I still think the_ferret is a solid lead and worthy of a lynching.

Even if we're wrong, well, there's always tommorow after all...

@Drk_O: Look at the bold. I would argue that bad excuses are possibly worse than no excuses, becuase they are a sign of someone striving to come up with a justification that doesn't exist. If there was no excuse, that could be becuase they had a perfectly good reason for doing what they did but chose to keep it to themselves.

I honestly think that the_ferret expected a quick lynch on Drk_O and did not think he would have to justify his actions until Day 2. When it became obvious that he had made a mistake, he rambled on about an experiment and his gut feelings. Neither of which seemed to have helped the Pro-Town side in any way.

Emperors Faithful wrote:Good sig.

I tire of the_ferrets half-baked excuses and prattling. He has almost no defence of his actions whatsoever, apart from some vauge references to some sort of experiment. Which he STILL did not deign to tell us in detail the purpose off.

His vote for Mekboy claiming that it was on his 'Gut feeling' is a sorry explanation indeed. It sounds like the desperate pleas of someone caught with thier hand in the cookie (lynching) jar. The possibility of a DLS and the_ferret team up does strike me as entirely pluasible. Both were apparently trying to get a quick lynch over Drk_O. I would still like to hear more from DLS, but he is not the most suspicious at the moment.

Vote: the_ferret

I defend you and I get lynched? Great loyalty plan EF.

You defend me?

To me you have been and will always be citizens. I said that before.

Words. Sweet, sweet words that turn to bitter orange wax in my ears.

Looking over the reasoning I'm going to change to DLS. But, because that would lynch him and we want the day to last a bit longer I'll just simply Unvote:Ferret, placing DLS with the majority.

vote dark_o as he was very quick to jump on the dls bandwagon

Vulkan_He'stan wrote:vote dark_o as he was very quick to jump on the dls bandwagon

We've spent the last two pages debating DLS v. the_ferret. I don't know if I'd call that quick.

well he'd been quiet in the shadow for a while then as soon as a few people put a vote on dls he jumps right in
I still suspect dls but dark-o seems more scummy

I'd like to see more of an explanation from Drk_O for his vote, simply becuase he's waited this long. 'Overlooking' someone is not quite enough of a satisfactory excuse. That said, we have been discussing the possibilty of one or both of these characters being genestealers for the past couple of pages.

well we have 3 or 4 genestealers at the moment im going with a
dark-o dls and the ferret as them
but im willing to change my oppinion

Bearing in mind that if the_ferret is a stealer, he still "wins" if his foul kindred survived, he may have voted for himself to throw us off the scent, not realising that once we lynch him, we'll know if he was a true cit or foul xenos scum by rifling through his belongings and making a judgement.

Ach well, guess this is the price i ay for sticking to my guns and nt bandwagon jumping on the "get the _ferret" witch hunt. I know you's will regret it, cuse I know I'm no stealer, just someone who took someones peculiar behaviour to heart and stuck with it as opposed to 'trying to secure a lynch'

How exactly can we 'overlook' people in this situation. I am convinced,CONVINCED that dark_O is a 'stealer, and the sweep in votes in my direction cause I am stll voting him (peculiar) as opposed to scoring easy lynchs by copying others votes has simply ushered in a chance for him to get me.

Again,I'm pointing at Dark_O,and if you lynch me then I urge you to learn from such a stupid mistake and get Dark_O.

I ain't the stealer...he is!

"Or perhaps it is that you are a crafty stealer whom learned from his past mistake of jumping on the bandwagon and is now keeping his vote to turn suspicion from himself. I must say it is strange that you shed your blood thirsty ways so quickly."

Deff Dread red Edition wrote:"Or perhaps it is that you are a crafty stealer whom learned from his past mistake of jumping on the bandwagon and is now keeping his vote to turn suspicion from himself. I must say it is strange that you shed your blood thirsty ways so quickly."

I fail to see how I have shed anything, I've maintained my vote, and I still urge you all to vote the same. If that makes me bloodthirsty then so be it. But you are genuinely making a mistake with suspecting me!