nkelsch wrote:
Howard A Treesong wrote:
It would appear not, but it's not too far a leap to conclude that the attitude he expressed is one he held while in the job, and that others at the top of
GW still think. Not that it should be a huge surprise really.
So Dakka pulled out the old 'jump to conclusions' mat and made a hypothetical thing to be mad about, acts as if it is true then devolves into a 'Why I hate
GW talking points' thread with a side of Internet Lynch mob. We have no idea what he thought while on the job, if anyone at
GW agreed with him or maybe he was let go for spouting his anti-fandom speech? No one knows but who cares about what actually happens when you can forge a narrative and discuss how smart we all are without facts.
A productive thread to say the least.
No. No-one knows whether he is employed by
GW or not. As has been stated previously, his Facebook and Linkedin status say he does; according to one poster from speaking to his
GW manager, he does not. So, who knows.