Switch Theme:

Without Number Special Rule  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Brainy Zoanthrope






WE'RE BRINGIN' IT BACK

But in all seriousness, why was this rule ever taken out of 40k? Is it because of AOF special rules? Whatever the reasoning is, 'Nid units like gaunts, rippers, and gargoyles (not to mention cultists, certain daemons, and guardsman even guardsmen already have it to an extent with platoons) It really limits what Tyranids can do when a tau firing line chips away 3 of the 12 hormagaunts in a squad and they end up retreating 8". And it's even worse when IG are allowed to bring dozens of soldiers in a single squad because of platoons but the swarm army isn't able to bring broods of more than 30.

   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: