Switch Theme:

MK III Iron Armour questions.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Esteemed Veteran Space Marine






Northumberland

Couple of questions about said armour:

A) Would Jump pack equipped assault squads have used it? To my knowledge, Forgeworld have never produced a Mk III jump pack, but I presume if it were to have been used by jump-pack Assault squads (as against foot assault squads or breacher squads), then the standard Mk II Crusade jump-pack would have been used (as the Mk III is an up-armoured varient of the Mk II armour).

B) Lexicanum repeatedly states that the Mk II and Mk III armours had fixed position helmets - why is it then that Forgeworld presents them as fully rotatable and removable helmets? Am I to assume that this is simple a retcon? (and one for the better if you ask me!)

If anybody could answer those it would be a great help!

Now with 100% more blog: 'Beyond the Wall'

Numine Et Arcu
 
   
Made in gb
Cultist of Nurgle with Open Sores





London, England

I've actually been wondering about this too. I don't think it's been retconed because it was mentioned in the whitedwarf with the space marine release
   
Made in gb
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General




United Kingdom

A) FW have said that MK III is too heavy to use with a jump pack.

B) I think it's more of a modelling decision than a retcon - because of the autosenses, etc, in the armour the marine can turn his head and change his view without the helmet having to physically move, but that wouldn't look good on a model.
   
Made in gb
Esteemed Veteran Space Marine






Northumberland

Hmm, thanks for the responses. Guess my Mk III dudes will have to be ground-bound :(

Now with 100% more blog: 'Beyond the Wall'

Numine Et Arcu
 
   
Made in gb
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'





Papua New Guinea

MKIII is really only a modified version of MKII with extra armour on the front to give much better protection. If you really, really wanted to put a jump pack on a MKIII model then it seems likely it would be the jump pack design used on the MKII.

And yes, they do have fixed helms and despite how it looks all mine are fixed facing forwards, dynamic stances be damned!

Be Pure!
Be Vigilant!
BEHAVE!

Show me your god and I'll send you a warhead because my god's bigger than your god.
 
   
Made in nz
Longtime Dakkanaut





MK III is for heavy stuff - boarding actions, frontal assaults across ground.
Jump packs are for quick insertions, speed is key so the lighter MK II is used. Same way they don't give terminators jump packs.

I agree with the comments about why the MK II and III have free helmets rather than fixed - it also makes those armour marks fully convertible with existing ones.
   
Made in gb
Courageous Space Marine Captain






Glasgow, Scotland

There's no reason Mk III can't have a Jump Pack. Its reinforced front is great for Melee combat so there's reason to suggest Assault Marines and Vanguard Veterans would were it.

I'm celebrating 8 years on Dakka Dakka!
I started an Instagram! Follow me at Deadshot Miniatures!
DR:90+S++G+++M+B+IPw40k08#-D+++A+++/cwd363R+++T(Ot)DM+
Check out my Deathwatch story, Aftermath in the fiction section!

Credit to Castiel for banner. Thanks Cas!
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: