Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Not sure if its really needed or not (im sure bloodletters would love it though!) but just had this random thought pop in my head while doing dishes.

Daemons get to reroll failed saves vs weapons apX (I was thinking 3, or maybe 2) or less. thoughts?

Why?

Imotekh has a good point.

Why do they get to re-roll saves when other things don't?

Guys, guys, I had an idea

Lets take the army with the most abusive re-roll save combo in the game

Then... then get this... we give it the ability to reroll even more saves

You Know what would fix Demons?, going back how it was.

My Bloodletters might be 9ppm now, but i rather play them when they where 26pts a model...

Demons of Khorne with T3 and 1A...how serious is this drivel?...

I play mono-tzeentch anf honestly i prefer this codex compared to the old one. Yea there are cheesy combos but every codex has them. But this re-roll to save idea isnt needed.