Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Nurgleboy77 wrote:

Gwar! wrote:

Nurgleboy77 wrote:Yes plenty, actually. There are much fewer Douchebags that think they are funny and rules lawyers as well.

Tell me, what constitutes a rules lawyer to you?

Someone more obsessed with being right than getting the rules right.

Thats kind of hypocritical itself, you ever seen the fluff forum at HO?

Nurgleboy77 wrote:Whatwhat, that's still no reason to be insulting. Maybe it's a better environment for new players, instead of the cynicism and nitpickers rampant on this site?

I can't see how here is any different on that from other 40k forums or any other forum in general for that matter.

How was that hypocritical?


Nope, not much of a fluffer. I don't obsess over the minutiae of the game.

Not much of a Trekky either, but I enjoy the movies and some of the shows.

Nurgleboy77 wrote:How was that hypocritical?

You said the rules forums here are full of people who think they're right in a view that this forum is worse when the fluff forums at HO are exactly that, full of people who self righteously think they are right.

As stated, I don't care about fluff. there is no "right" in fluff.

I meant there is a far less instances if people arguing for weeks/pages about the meaning of "counts as" or "instead of".

But now I'm being drawn into the very sillyness I don't like about DD.....

Cheese Elemental wrote:On a side note: Gwar, how many females have you actually seen?

Fe-Male? You mean... Like... Sisters of Battle? I thought they were fictional...

Nurgleboy77 wrote:As stated, I don't care about fluff. there is no "right" in fluff.

Ok you "don't care," I "don't care" about rules. Doesn't make any difference. And the people at HO would disagree that there is no "right" in fluff.

I meant there is a far less instances if people arguing for weeks/pages about the meaning of "counts as" or "instead of".

And no there isn't, as I said. Check the fluff forums.

Nurgleboy77 wrote:But now I'm being drawn into the very sillyness I don't like about DD.....

o rly

whatwhat wrote:

Nurgleboy77 wrote:But now I'm being drawn into the very sillyness I don't like about DD.....

o rly

That looks a lot like a herpes infection to me soldier.

G

In before lock :"o

On another note I am glad to see Gwar ! Finally took my advice and removed the MDG quote from his sig. There are quite a few refugees here who were perma banned from WARSEER. I have a list.

G

This topic should have been in news and it's not news any longer.

I'm going to lock it to save any further anti-Warseer rabbitry.