Exarch_Nektel wrote:It's an intolerance thing. It also gives us something to talk about. I've always liked the philosophy: "If religion is right, you can look forward to eternal life. If atheism is right, it doesn't matter anyway. Better safe than sorry." this usually stops the argument.
However, belief for the sake of belief, I am sure, will not exactly impress. Belief in the face of persecution or oppression, sure. You stick to what you believe and I am sure god will tip his beard to you. However, simply electing to "believe" in something simply because it offers you the best odds will impress no one.
Although the following argument can also apply:
Why is your god, one of several thousand that humanity has believed in over the centuries, the correct one to believe in? What makes him more real, or your religion correct, when compared with any of the others?
Automatically Appended Next Post: utan wrote:Generalizations and stereotypes are for lazy thinkers.
That is quite a generalisation you have made there. Perhaps you should go away and survey every single person on the planet to determine if they a) generalise and b) are lazy and come back and correlate your findings for us so that one may not be accused of stereotyping lazy people as the sole perpetrators of generalisations