Hi Tom (Pyriel) .. Nick ... As the owner of the B&C and the person who pays for it out of his own pocket (with no advertising as you commented), I find it almost laughable that you need to go to such lengths to critique the B&C. Looks like somehow we touched a nerve for you guys!
Obviously Games Workshop don't "pay" for the B&C, nor have I escaped the gaze of their legal team who tried to shut down the Space Marine Painter I wrote. Its almost comedic that you would say that really, given the hassle they gave me for the painter, however I am sure GW Legal have sent letters to you and will do again, good luck with that
Anyway moving on you guys were banned because you broke the rules over on the B&C, nuff said really. I understand that frustrates you, but we really don't let people try and sell stuff via our board (hence no advertising).
I had to pop in as I got so many people telling me about this thread I had to come take a look at the "B&C Hate", as a long time Dakka Member I wish you guys good luck here, its a great board and as you can see I do post here quite a bit, so I look forward to seeing you around.
Anyway back on topic, love the sculpting Tom, very talented work, you should try for a job at GW perhaps?
Brother Argos
Bolter & Chainsword Owner.
p.s. For the record, I am the Managing Director of a profitable computer business, which is how I can afford to pay for the B&C but that doesn't sound half as much fun as being a super secret spy fronting for Games Workshop special covert legal operations does it now? .. hmmm but as a covert super secret spy I would say that wouldn't I
Oh hi Argos (David).
After all the
PM and email stonewalling from BnC I figured I post a bit nerve touching things in here to finally get a word with you and lo and behold, to my astonishment it actually worked (and people say I have a knack for the manipulative side, hehe).
So what gives, lets take it in here then rather then in BnC if you wish.
Yes you are right, you really touched a nerve there. I am least to say upset about the double standards the BnC has shown, getting booted of without even a
PM for daring to show a green and helping a fellow sculptor out (no ads, no sales talk etc on my part) touched a nerve that is true. Surprised?
The things you say to and about me on your board about ripping
GWs IP of and making money of them is laughable when you do so yourself using
GW IP in the boards name and arts and that is not even a straight out comparison since I dont use direct
GW IP contrary to you. The painter on BnC uses
GW IP in a far more "illegal" way then any art copy of
GW art transferred to greenstuff. Congratulations on wringling out of the
GW legal trap on that one but then please dont preach to me that I´m doing "bad" things with
GW IP since well, you know, stones and glass houses and all that.
Maybe you are not the
GW secret spy but wrangling out of that calls for some high friends at the
GW drinking bar at the least, that is if you dont want to mix in money into the equation.
We dont make money of
GWs IP or rip them of as you said, any more then
GW "rip" of Tolkien, Moorcock and Lucas and make money based of their IP and popularity crowd. The BnC itself using
GW terminology to draw people in (and be a huge advertising boost to
GW themselves) is different in exactly what way?
Dont say the difference is you dont make money of
GW´s IP since the very same IP is what is alloweing your board/investment to grow and rise in value.
And those bolter and chainsword t-shirts and dice etc etc?
If I sold
GW shoulderpad or chapterhouse T-shirts etc wouldnt you be the first to call me out as ripping
GW IP of?
But here I am, posting a greenstuff picture, being previously called out to make money of
GWs IP and funny enough booted of the site for showing a green, thats all, showing a green.
What happens next, will the BnC start banning people for showing of painted models using my sculpts on them answering questions about them that they bought them from
CH?
That if anything is advertising.
What nerve did I touch with you David, was it you thinking I´m a bad person that dares to do the same thing that
GW or you yourself do albeit in a different shape, was it an angry email from
GW or was it just you thinking some my sculpts are ugly (nothing new here)? Because whatever it was it sure as hell wasnt me doing advertising.
I´m sure the BnC mods are going to bring out some old fight which I was a part of to excuse this "later" ban, I dont care and quite frankly its so blatantly transparent that I am amazed to find it more amusing then pissing of and I am known for being easily pissed of
If you had such a problem with my greens pictures taking them for advertising despite nothing close to that being written by me (I helped out a sculptor with problems) as I am sure you saw the pics as that, why didnt you simply
PM me about it rather then hiding behind proxy mods and go with a boot and then have the mods hide under the rug not even answering an email?
If that was such an issue I would have been more then happy to basically stop posting any "green" pictures what so ever.
Or was it the mistake that I posted the picture in Nicks thread where Nick used a banner picture about the site? Ok if so then my mistake, funny that you collateral ban people you dont agree with then. Besides having a banner like Nick has is not forbidden by the BnC rules.
Maybe it was Phal banon (think his nick is) who mentioned the forbidden "sale" word in Nicks post that threw you in a fit of collateral banning?
You might want to
PM Phal since as soon as I saw his "sales" reply I PMed him telling him to not write any references to selling things since that goes against the BnC rules!
THAT´S how I follow them and THAT´S how non advertising I am so yes you hit a nerve by banning me based on a lie.
That if anything tells me I was the one hitting a very big nerve with you rather then you hitting a nerve with me!
What pisses me of is you laughing this of instead of mending it and hiding behind Nicks word usage. Answering with a "Fascists, thats funny" to his questions instead of admitting I was banned for invented reasons is childish, embarrassing and quite frankly as far from you as I thought it would be.
Now days the BnC has lost its magical touch, at least for me personally, gone are the passionate fights and arguments I was used to have about valid topics despite trying out a few to see if the fire was still there.
Now days the BnC is about 20 000 new kids all asking the same questions over and over again, how old is a space marine, how big is a boltgun etc etc.
Now I only ever use(d) the BnC as a friends contact site to keep up with old fellow hobbyists and online friends and to show and help out the fellow sculptor/painter now and then, nothing more!
So this sudden ban didnt produce anything but annoy me of and make a bunch of my friends unhappy since I hardly ever talk to or show my work on any other site out of old habits sake.
Congratulations on a biased ban and to handling it all so "mature", that rocked me and my belief in the BnC.
So you had
GW legal trouble, well with the blatant usage of direct
GW IP in both software as well as board art and terminology and all that for "free", well, it makes me smile...
Yes
GW legal sent letters to us too but those were far from "legal" and had my lawyer almost laugh his behind out of his chair when he read a copy of them. Corporate thugging and "demanding" might work on 14 year old hobbyists but the funny thing is how did it work on you when
GW had substantial IP copying and usage to call you out in their letters?
Hmm...if you paid, are paid, have a mutual deal or simply great amountof luck doesnt interest me, congratulations to a very nice deal and hope it continue to be profitable for you.
However what is rather insulting is you accusing me of making money of
GW IP, being illegal etc all while I work my behind of and pour significant amounts of money into a legal system to make sure everything is 100% legal and correct. That this doesnt always concur with
GWs legal policy page (read, not the true legals) is irrelevant to say the least.
You are actually the last person that has the right to be upset, amused or surprised that I called you out on making money on
GW in return. What goes around comes around.
I broke the BnC rules and was banned for it, "nuff said"? Allow me to laugh David!
That is a blatant lie and the really funny thing is that both I and you know it so please dont insult my intellect and just drop that approach.
I never ever advertised, I never ever mentioned selling things nor did I ever link to any site that sells my stuff.
Heck if I would want to even subtly advertise my things on the BnC I´d get a banner under my sig like Nick did, all allowed under your BnC rules.
I know from your past words that you personally hate what I do (ripping of
GW IP...pot calling kettle), dont like my "sallie" sculpts and dont even deign to answer
PMs from me even when I asked you about your personal opinion on sculpting issues and seeked a way for us to "make piece".
What you did banning me over a blatant lie like this is as I said, low and hypocritical and it reeks of
GW bias at worst or your dislike of what I do at best.
You (plus donations) pay the BnC site out of your own (and others) pockets, ok if you say so (not that it matters to you if I say I am doing a legal business myself), all logics however point to quite the contrary.
The "upkeep" makes for quite some investment:
http://www.websiteoutlook.com/www.bolterandchainsword.com
Plus I bet the 45% of on all
GW toys are thrown in the bargain.
Congratulations to some money well made on
GW´s IP David and good luck making even more in the future, after all money and hobby together is the best of things.
but please dont stoop so low as to call me out on making money of
GW and banning me for an invented advertising that I never did, that is laughable and really doesnt suit you from what I know of you from chats past.
The BnC is one gigantic free
GW advertising neon bright sign, the eventual trouble you had with your guys at
GW were surely more for show then serious or you would have been sued for using actual direct
GW IP in a money/investment making way.
Yes and I still remember that day when the BnC crashed and you rushed headlong back to the
UK from a vacation in Spain with family to as quickly as possible repair the damage and get the BnC site back up.
Naturally you were hailed as a living santa clause by the not knowing better community but it takes a blind fool not to see a person doesnt abandon a vacation in Spain with family to cut a few days of a board crash and get it back online unless there are money involved in it.
I cant recall any instance when the FoN or
SB sites had their owners or us admins abandon all they were doing to "save" a couple extra days of surfing fun for some hobbyists around the globe. You must be the kindest person on this planet...which kinda doesnt make sense with you banning me for something I never did in the first place.
You must surely have confused me with my friend Nick why actually HAD an advertising banner under his name on the BnC and on occasion posted a bit to "provoking" threads but no, my and his accounts are not the same so do it right and do it again and please drop the you were banned because you advertised or at least incluse a new BnC rule of colateral banning if one person tresspasses.
To bad you never did as your mods preach and used the
PM function with me to solve an irritating issue without polluting the board but then again why should you when you can simply make whole threads vanish and then refuse to reply to emailed questions.
Although my favourite has to be the Facist thing, really ... its all about a game of toy soldiers Nick, what do you think we are going to do ... invade toy Poland?
Strange, I thought it was about a site that acts as a pretty big future monetary investment and doesnt allow any "unwanted" persons on it and invents reasons to ban them but hey, the toy soldier part of the hobby is darn fun.
Tell you what, next time your in London drop me a line, we can kick back, have a beer and a game
If you really meant that why didnt you have a serious discussion in a
PM or online with Nick rather then invent a rule breakage (on my part) and delete it and then stonwall it?
for crying out, it took me to post these things in here to even get an acknowledge from you (forced you out) and even then all you do is avoid the issue of my and Nicks banning like a politician avoids
raised taxation issues.
And no, "nuff said" is not an argument.
But I´ll take you up on your offer and even write about it after wards in here.
Next time I´m in the
UK I´ll drop you a line, I think it would be kinda fun to have a beer and a game, best outcome we realize the other guy is not such a bad person after all, worst outcome, status quo.
Although I´d need some form of means to contact you, how on earth am I going to drop you a line about us having a beer when you never reply even to
PMs sent on your very own board?
I cant even contact your admins and ask for a beer with you, they dont reply either the polite lot of them.
Do you use MSN? Skype? ICQ?
Please advise David!
Cheers.
Pyriel aka. Tom.