Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Basically, every answer proposed(autohit, 4+, 6+) is arbitrary depending upon how each poster wants it to be. The RAW clearly does not cover this eventuality. Movement in the "previous turn" is undefinable when you are talking about a first turn assault. So follow GW's advice and agree among yourselves or roll it off if you can't agree.

I think this has gone as far as it's going to.

Personally, I'm siding with the vehicle not having had a previous movement, and so auto-hit. YMMV.


Locking this one to avoid it going around in circles for the next week.