Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

nosferatu1001 wrote:Because the TWM for Lords states that it adds "+1" to S. This was not errata'ed to S5 base, hence the S9/10 (either double and add, or not)

...sorry?

Thunder Wolf Mount for Wolf Lords. Adds "+1S" and this was not errated to be a change to the basic stat, and not a modification.

To be consistent y ou would have to make a TWM'd WolF Lord hit monoliths at S8 if you believe that altering the users strength is disallowed in the Monolith rules.

Meh, FAQ says it's a profile change not a stat adjustment so, meh.

I thought they only said the T change was a stat adjustment?

Anyways....

Think of it this way:

LM rule states it's WS+D6 no matter what (where WS = Weapon Strength)

For PF the equation will be 2*US=WS (where US = User strength)

when FC comes into play it changes to: (2*US)+1=WS.

So even taking FC into account, it still stays the same base WS+D6

My 2c

Which was my point - FC isnt modifying the weapon strength, it modifies the user. The fact this alters the weapons strength isnt important to LM - it never mentions it.