Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Ahtman wrote:I can understand why people would not agree with her politics and I don't believe she is a beauty on the level of Helen of Troy, but I don't believe for a second the whole "she is ugly" bologna some people are spewing. Perhaps it is becuase I didn't grow up on internet porn but I believe most women are beautiful in their own way. I also find trying to compare an amateur photo of a mother and a professional photo of a 19 year old a bit of a cherry picking expedition. They are both attractive women. I would have no trouble taking either out for a nice steak dinner and then not calling them afterwords.

Palin has staffers that pick her clothes, do her hair/makeup, etc. for every appearance she makes and every photo she takes, so lets not pretend palin is a "natural beauty"

Like her public persona, her appearance is artificial and manufactured.

She tries very hard to work the "naughty secretary/slutty librarian" archetype with the glasses and short skirt buisness suits, etc., etc. but at the end of the day she is slightly above average at best, and that is before you hear her speak (her accent and stupid catch phrases alone are cringe-worthy) or realize what she stands for...

Most women present themselves as well as they possibly can, through makeup, clothes, fashion advice and so on. Is that so wrong?

Obviously some try harder than others...



Anyway, if you don't like Palin that leaves all the more for the rest of us with lower standards.

Kilkrazy wrote:

Anyway, if you don't like Palin that leaves all the more for the rest of us with lower standards.

Lord knows they were lining up on Dakka to being with

What she... is really impacts how I view her. It's hard for me to treat someone I have absolutely no respect for completely unselfishly, and even then it would affect performance too greatly to make it fun. Chemistry makes for a much better lay and lack of is dually bad >.<

What you need is some pre coital 'medicine'.

The internet porn reference is funny because porn is full of extremely ugly women with massive implants.

Amaya wrote:The internet porn reference is funny because porn is full of extremely ugly women with massive implants.

Oh yeah...these women are hideous.

halonachos wrote:

Albatross wrote:...I've done sex on.

Learn to speak english please.

He wrote it properly. Alby's in a band, so he's the kind of guy who can have sex with women, on women.

I don't think she's model-beautiful, but for a girl her age, she's pretty well kept. Even though she's not Claudia Jacques material, I'd still do her.

FITZZ wrote:

Amaya wrote:The internet porn reference is funny because porn is full of extremely ugly women with massive implants.

Oh yeah...these women are hideous.

I never said all of them were ugly.

Amaya wrote:

FITZZ wrote:

Amaya wrote:The internet porn reference is funny because porn is full of extremely ugly women with massive implants.

Oh yeah...these women are hideous.

I never said all of them were ugly.

In truth most are at least reasonably attractive...sure,there are a few that a bit "bleh"...but by and large the majority are physically fit and cute.
At least those who are professional "actresses"

Just because Palin got a porno for her doesn't make her pretty.

That guy from the Partridge Family got one and Lorena Bobbit's husband got one, too.

Uh, according to my research...

malfred wrote:Just because Palin got a porno for her doesn't make her pretty.

That guy from the Partridge Family got one and Lorena Bobbit's husband got one, too.

Uh, according to my research...

So did Joey Buttafouco..IIRC.


....Yeah...theres some ugly stuff in porn.

It would seem that everyone got fixated on the word porn and missed the real reference.

@Dogma: I wouldn't use the word alluring either, I just find the people calling her ugly disingenuous,

halonachos wrote:

Melissia wrote:

FITZZ wrote:

Cannerus_The_Unbearable wrote:

FITZZ wrote:

Solo Falcon 1138 wrote:She is very attractive... right up to the point where sounds come out of her mouth in the form of words...

Yup...she becomes less and less attractive with each sentence she speaks.

...which is different from most women?

Well...now that you mention it.

And most men...

...who dress up as women.

I was Dr. Frank-N-Furter for Halloween.
Wanna see?

Absolutely not.

Congrats on coming out of the closet though.

Har har.

Hardly gay, but it was worth a laugh.


Also, a 6 (or so) kid called be a f*g. I took of my heels and threated to throw down. After he ran, I chased him for a while.

Tall gangly male in fishnets, a speedo and corset chasing a little kid....

Good times

(only two others said anything to bother me. One chick asked if I had a d*ck, to which I replied, "Wanna kiss it?" and an African woman said she was glad I was cold when I complained loud enough for her to hear)

The funny thing is, because of the outfit and the fact I wore a hat, I looked more like a Burlesque stripper than Frank.

Amaya wrote:

gregor_xenos wrote:

Amaya wrote:What is with people's obsession with Palin?

ummmm.... She's hot.

Meh, people have strange standards of beauty then.

For a woman in her mid-40s (b 1964), she's in pretty good shape. Easily top quintile appearance for her age. Looks-wise, one could do a lot worse.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Kilkrazy wrote:Which of these two is more attractive then?

I'm more Asian than Republican.

Dick Cheiny and Sarah Palin should go hunting together. There's one problem solved, but unfortunately Dick has an army of robot clones waiting in the darkest depths of Mordor to replace him should anything go wrong.

She isn't the best looking woman in the world, but honestly if you think she is ugly you have a very skewed view of psychical attractiveness.

Although just about everything else about her is pretty much a turn off.

Palins's got that "hot librarian" thing going with the glasses.

OTOH, Ann Coulter has much better makeup - I'd bend her over a table...

Her political ideas by turns bemuse and horrify me, but she is a very, very good-looking woman.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Palin, that is.

Coulter is straight out of Tomb Kings.

There's something sexy about power, so Palin gets a few bonus points there. But, she's a bit of a tough call.

She's pretty hot from a purely physical standpoint. She's got the slutty temptress thing going on. The conservative/taboo thing gives her some of that "forbidden fruit" appeal. And, although she's not the sharpest tool in the shed, she's smarter than the women who go into modeling/porn and rely 100% of their looks.

But, she's still rather dumb. And, her views are quite the turnoff. She's not as much of a looker as someone in their 20's. And, her accent is rather irritating.


So, what I'm saying is, she's do-able in a "I'm gonna you senseless" manner. No sweet seduction. No wine and dine. Just the physical side of things, and throw in a few of the more "degrading" acts for good measure.

I wonder how she talks off-camera, when there's no need to sell herself to us little people. (See, e.g., Obama's cheesy dips into a southern accent.)

She's as pretty as the make-up she puts on her face. Just about any woman whose not grossly over weight, with a professional makeup staff or personal assistants will look decent enough.

http://www.momlogic.com/2008/10/turning_palin_into_a_real_hock.php

There you go. A man's face is his autobiography. A woman's is her work of fiction.

Firstly, her eyes without her glasses wouldn't look like that (too small and too far apart).

Secondly, it's already a not-that-good photo to begin with.

My opinion.

Taoofss wrote:She's as pretty as the make-up she puts on her face. Just about any woman whose not grossly over weight, with a professional makeup staff or personal assistants will look decent enough.

http://www.momlogic.com/2008/10/turning_palin_into_a_real_hock.php

There you go. A man's face is his autobiography. A woman's is her work of fiction.

Besides being an incredibly poor job of shooping, that isn't really a fair assessment becuase it it is possible to take a photo of any woman, no matter how pretty, and have her appear ugly. I don't think it is a secret that computers and makeup are largely responsible for making most o what is sold as beautiful in mass media. Think of the prettiest actress you can and there will be an ugly picture of her somewhere without makeup.

Before Photoshop:



After PS:

Can someone explain this to me?

Ahtman wrote:Besides being an incredibly poor job of shooping, that isn't really a fair assessment becuase it it is possible to take a photo of any woman, no matter how pretty, and have her appear ugly. I don't think it is a secret that computers and makeup are largely responsible for making most o what is sold as beautiful in mass media. Think of the prettiest actress you can and there will be an ugly picture of her somewhere without makeup.

Makeup is magic.

If I can find it, there's a really good video of a really plain girl who puts on makeup on TV and looks incredible!

Manchu wrote:Can someone explain this to me?

No i cannot... I care not to try either

DA's Forever wrote:

Manchu wrote:Can someone explain this to me?

No i cannot... I care not to try either

... ummm " Uber Shocker"??...sorry...that was in poor taste.

FITZZ wrote:

DA's Forever wrote:

Manchu wrote:Can someone explain this to me?

No i cannot... I care not to try either

... ummm " Uber Shocker"??...sorry...that was in poor taste.

but good for a chuckle