Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

What that we were above discrimination and it didn't occur.

If I had drunk out of a cup that some dirty juve's balls have been dunked in like a Rich Tea biscuit, my reaction would be a stiff upper lip, but not in the way you are suggesting.

Make jokes about sexual haranguing and laugh it off. Really?
Again, this would be seen by the pupils as carte blanche for more of the same and worse.

Why should it be tolerated? Just to fulfill some notion of a national sterotype?

From The Daily Sun Wednesday 28th Feb 2011:
"Timmy Townsend of 4BA startled me by grabbing my breasts. I was shocked and disturbed but maintained my composure. I quiped, you don't get many of those to the pound do you Timmy. My how we laughed at his merry jape!" Said Ms Jones the attractive 34 year old Maths teacher.
"I've always had a good head for figures." she said smiling coyly.
We thing your body has some pretty good figures too!

sheesh

Chibi Bodge-Battle wrote:What that we were above discrimination and it didn't occur.

If I had drunk out of a cup that some dirty juve's balls have been dunked in like a Rich Tea biscuit, my reaction would be a stiff upper lip, but not in the way you are suggesting.

Oh Noes, a certain part of skin touched a certain part of something that is undefined!

Chibi Bodge-Battle wrote:
Make jokes about sexual haranguing and laugh it off. Really?
Again, this would be seen by the pupils as carte blanche for more of the same and worse.

Why should it be tolerated? Just to fulfill some notion of a national sterotype?

Nope, never said it should be tolerated.

You should read what I write.

We don't know the teachers whole story so I'm really not going to complain that she took a few days off. I would laugh, but I wouldn't think highly of the person who did it.

That is the implication of what you are saying.

oh noes?
you may want your lips to caress an oject that a young adolescent's privy parts have touched.
Your predilictions are not universal.

you may want your lips to caress an oject that a young adolescent's privy parts have touched.

If i'm not mistaken, the mug was used for tea. It is unclear when the drink was made, but due to the fact his balls were in it and it was left in an empty classroom, I think it's safe to say that it would've been washed before the next use, either with a rinse and then insertion of boiling water, or just the latter.

Either way, the fact she made tea in it meant that boiling water must have made an appearance at some stage, and would've killed any bacteria that was present.

There's nothing I can see supporting any possible harm his genitals could've caused her. At all. All it would've meant is that she used two teabags.

The problem with this thread is that everyone keeps trying to BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM! BLAME THE VICTIM!

That's alright then

Sorry I thought the issue was all about the hygiene. my bad.

I cannot help but feel concerned about the standards of some of the people on Dakka.
Someone picks up your yoy soldiers and break them then it is all how much you are gonna pummel the creep.

But someone sticks their nadgers in a woman's teacup and that is seen as acceptable, nay amusing.

Not by me. I think the kid is a little witch. If he'd have been one of my classmates I would battered him after class had finished.

Scruffy bastard.

I hate ill-discipline in a class-room (even though I was extremely disruptive at that age) - to the extent that I police it in my current uni classes. To be fair, the lecturer *should* manage their class better - doesn't change the fact that I'm there to learn, and that I'm paying for the lesson. I've told classmates to 'shut the feth up' or turn their phones off many times.

My dad was punched in the face by one of the kids at the prison he teaches at, and was working the next day, so I think that her taking a few days off work is a bit unreasonable, but I agree with the punishment that he got.

Goliath wrote:My dad was punched in the face by one of the kids at the prison he teaches at, and was working the next day, so I think that her taking a few days off work is a bit unreasonable, but I agree with the punishment that he got.

To be fair though, your dad teaches at a prison so should probably expect behavior like that.

Yeah that's rough Goliath

As has been said we don't know the back story so this may have been the culmination of other intimidation.

Also bear in mind that people react differently to situations.
Not sure I'd want to be as quick getting back to work as your Dad after that incident if I am totally honest

SilverMK2 wrote:

Goliath wrote:My dad was punched in the face by one of the kids at the prison he teaches at, and was working the next day, so I think that her taking a few days off work is a bit unreasonable, but I agree with the punishment that he got.

To be fair though, your dad teaches at a prison so should probably expect behavior like that.

Ugh. Expecting the behavior and receiving it are two different things.

malfred wrote:Ugh. Expecting the behavior and receiving it are two different things.

I don't disagree.

dogma wrote:Wangers on the glass at the Alano Club?!?

That just ain't right!

Sorry, didn't get that one.


Regardless of what some people here think is harmless, the prank in itself is what is buggering. Dipping your gonads in someone's cup, man or woman, is just base, dirty, and a person like that deserves expulsion because it's an act of malice towards another person.

Destrado wrote:Dipping your gonads in someone's cup, man or woman...

It's going to be a bit difficult for a woman to dip her gonads into a cup

Hey, I was just saying that the story was funny, im not saying that the kid doesnt deserve punishment.

Oh and the teacher didnt need any time off.

I put my balls in my girlfriends mouth and have her hum the national anthem regularly and it doesnt do her any harm, I dont see why the teacher needed to go on leave.

Destrado wrote:
Dipping your gonads in a man or woman's cup,

Thanks, that bit was begging to be cleared up

Matty: Undoubtedly your girlfriend has a whole different relationship with you

Needing time off or not is not up to us. Facing a whole class that knew what had happened can be psycologically intimidating, especially because it will most likely disturb the class will all sorts of bad jokes.

People are different and taking time off doesn't mean she's a bad teacher. Seen lot of bad stuff happen to good teachers.

Chibi Bodge-Battle wrote:That is the implication of what you are saying.

No, no it isn't. I've already said that retaliation should be exacted, which necessarily indicates that it isn't acceptable. Again, read what I write.

Chibi Bodge-Battle wrote:
oh noes?
you may want your lips to caress an oject that a young adolescent's privy parts have touched.
Your predilictions are not universal.

Yes, oh noes. It is an expression of dismissive disdain (and alliteration).

I don't want to drink from cups touched by male genitalia, I wouldn't pay for such a thing, but I also am not going to pretend that such an event is tantamount to eternal corruption of either myself or the object in question.

Its a cup, wash it, and get over yourself.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Destrado wrote:

dogma wrote:Wangers on the glass at the Alano Club?!?

That just ain't right!

Sorry, didn't get that one.

Varsity Blues.

Mentioned before, but we really don't know what has happened before this or all the factors contributing.

Which is what makes this a true internet argument

dogma wrote:I don't want to drink from cups touched by male genitalia, I wouldn't pay for such a thing, but I also am not going to pretend that such an event is tantamount to eternal corruption of either myself or the object in question.

Its a cup, wash it, and get over yourself.

Hygiene etc. etc. I don't think that is the crux of the matter.

For a start, exposing genitals to "harass, alarm or distress" is an offence in the UK. Photographing a minor doing so is even more so, let alone posting them on the Internet. But that's an aside.

The point is this act was to insult and/or humiliate the teacher, in a manner considered obscene within the bounds of British society.

The problem with taking offence is it can only be measured by the person a comment or act is aimed at. If someone calls me a prick, gakker, witch, (more insulting pre-swear filter) etc. etc. I'm not going to be bothered. If one black person calls a black acquaintance 'n*****', then offence may not to be taken. If a white person not acquainted with said black person used the same word, the story may be a whole lot different. My point is, you may not care nor take offence; that teacher did. Your personality has absolutely no relevance to her personality, so "get over yourself" is moot.

At the end of the day, no-one was ever expelled from school, or had to take time off sick, because a person didn't dip their nuts in a mug and then didn't post the picture on Facebook.

Is everyone bored now? Shall I lock the thread?

Guess so. I'm not really sure what the discussion is.

Yeah I just posted the story because it was funny, i hardly thought of it as a point of great discussion. ;S

In before l