Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Urethra circumcised man or uncircumcised man, there taint no in between in this comic.

Monster Rain wrote:

Albatross wrote:Hey, urethra comic all you want! As far as I'm concerned, it's in poor taste.

I racked my brain trying to come up with one for urethra and to no avail.

Brilliant, sir. Simply brilliant.

Truly, Alby's wit will never phallus.

Cannerus_The_Unbearable wrote:

Fafnir wrote:

Cheesecat wrote:I'm circumcised it's not as bad as the comic makes it out to be.

Considering that a good 75% of the erotically sensitive nerve endings of the penis are contained in the foreskin, yeah, it is pretty bad not to have it. Not to mention natural lubrication.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_effects_of_circumcision

Apparently studies exist multiple ways for this. I highly doubt 75% though or from a practical perspective most guys would quite literally explode a nut after their 10 seconds of glory.

Either way the article said there's no valid evidence, so no one can be sure if any of these circumcision myths are true or not.

I don't see what the big deal is? Why is everyone being so testi! This comic is getting the shaft!

Cheesecat wrote:

Cannerus_The_Unbearable wrote:

Fafnir wrote:

Cheesecat wrote:I'm circumcised it's not as bad as the comic makes it out to be.

Considering that a good 75% of the erotically sensitive nerve endings of the penis are contained in the foreskin, yeah, it is pretty bad not to have it. Not to mention natural lubrication.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_effects_of_circumcision

Apparently studies exist multiple ways for this. I highly doubt 75% though or from a practical perspective most guys would quite literally explode a nut after their 10 seconds of glory.

Either way the article said there's no valid evidence, so no one can be sure if any of these circumcision myths are true or not.

The only real way to get evidence on this is to time travel, unfortunately. In the mean time, some men will have to douche while others don't. I know what team I'm on.

Back on topic: I've never met a manhood talk about this sort of thing on a 40k forum. This is a private matter. I never sausage blatant disregard of decency, for pete's snake. Let's disco stick tac toe or or something more appropriate (looks like I had to stretch for this one, but the rules are rigid so hopefully it's not too hard to swallow).

Now now we are all members of Dakka here...

Some are more members than others...

SlaveToDorkness wrote:Some are more members than others...

I'd definitely call you a member.

Alright, this thread has gone to far, time to nip this in the bud.

Ahtman wrote:Alright, this thread has gone to far, time to nip this in the bud.

I call phallic play, Ahtman why do you have to be so hard and rigid towards us?

It's odd how a comic about circumcision has turned into mental masturbation!

Cannerus_The_Unbearable wrote:

SlaveToDorkness wrote:Some are more members than others...

I'd definitely call you a member.

Ouch.... especially from such a tool expert.

SlaveToDorkness wrote:

Cannerus_The_Unbearable wrote:

SlaveToDorkness wrote:Some are more members than others...

I'd definitely call you a member.

Ouch.... especially from such a tool expert.

That was a bit too hard...

If a Quiz is Quizzical, this is certainly starting to get Test like.

Slarg232 wrote:If a Quiz is Quizzical, this is certainly starting to get Test like.

Douché?

I know someone who acts as an agent for circumscissors.
He is not greedy and only takes a small cut.

These puns...

They kill me...

Chowderhead wrote:These puns...

They kill me...

I know, it's getting really hard for me to make up a good one now.

sebster wrote:

And you can't make it unexist!

I see some possible anti-semitism here, the guy is against the cutting of the foreskin and has blond hair and blue eyes. The Aryan part is down and the fact that he fights people who circumsize others means he would be fighting the typical Jewish tradition of circumcision.

^ Your a little bit late on that but good call anyway. I didn't realize he was Aryan.

Mike Noble wrote:^ Your a little bit late on that but good call anyway. I didn't realize he was Aryan.

Glans to know I could help someone see something new. Speaking of which the guy's a total hippocrite. I mean he's against circumcision but he prefers a quick snip when he goes from mild mannered Richard Pennis into Circumcision man.

Some people are so rigid in their thinking that they keep ramming their head against the wall over and over to little or no effect.

halonachos wrote:I see some possible anti-semitism here, the guy is against the cutting of the foreskin and has blond hair and blue eyes. The Aryan part is down and the fact that he fights people who circumsize others means he would be fighting the typical Jewish tradition of circumcision.

Yeah, I didn't notice that at first, but once it was mentioned on the other forum I saw this on I couldn't stop seeing it. On a second look, the evil circumcising doctor in the comic has Jewish traits, as well.

I don't think it's necessarily overt anti-semitism, though it wouldn't surprise me to find out the author comes from a movement with a heritage of anti-semitism, if you get what I mean.

I mean, ultimately I'm just really puzzled as to why a minor cosmetic procedure that no baby remembers would become this grand cause. If you're going to become very protective over the genitals of babies, wouldn't it be more worther to write a comic about the actual, real horrors of female genital mutilation?

I think these puns are actually worse than the comic. Shame on you dakkadakka, shame on you!

We can't help ourselves, chod damn it!

Though I agree with you to some extent - it would probably be a good idea to weiner selves off penis puns...


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Cannerus wrote:I never sausage blatant disregard of decency, for pete's snake.

This is inspired, by the way. You choad great command of the English language to come up with it. Wankyou very much for your efforts.

Ahtman wrote:Some people are so rigid in their thinking that they keep ramming their head against the wall over and over to little or no effect.

Noo... they stick their head into a hole to avoid reality. Sometimes until they puke!

asimo77 wrote:I think these puns are actually worse than the comic. Shame on you dakkadakka, shame on you!

Now now, no need to get all bent out of shape.

asimo77 wrote:I think these puns are actually worse than the comic. Shame on you dakkadakka, shame on you!

Urine a bad mood or something?

Cheesecat wrote:

asimo77 wrote:I think these puns are actually worse than the comic. Shame on you dakkadakka, shame on you!

Urine a bad mood or something?

That one was a bit of a stretch. . . try and hold it in from now on. Don't get ahead of yourself.

You're all doing it dong.