Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

DeadlySquirrel wrote:No, they get the black spot because they're right. There is no global warming. Even Al Gore came out and said it was a lie. It is the same with cancer.

It happened with the TB outbreak over here before pasteurisation. The government knew exactly what was causing the TB (milk) but didn't take action and allowed many to die unnecessarily because of the money they made from the milk.

Citation needed

actually Citations

Plural

As in, you need to bring a lot of them

Get a truck, fill it with citations, dump them here in front of me.

DeadlySquirrel, are you a poe?

I can't tell.

But honestly, let's face it. Nothing is going to dissuade you from this position.

Your position is that the entire scientific community except for 4 or 5 doctors on the internet are working together to hide the truth about a variety of things for monetary reasons which, when divided amongst all of the people who would need to be involved, cannot possibly be worth it.

And let me tell you something, I am the one in this thread MOST LIKELY to agree with you on something like this. I think the Kennedy assassination involved more people than just Oswald. I believe he was killed by people who may or may not have been with an intelligence agency at the time and I think your position is unreasonable and illogical.

That should cause you to look inward.

Rented Tritium wrote:

DeadlySquirrel wrote:No, they get the black spot because they're right. There is no global warming. Even Al Gore came out and said it was a lie. It is the same with cancer.

It happened with the TB outbreak over here before pasteurisation. The government knew exactly what was causing the TB (milk) but didn't take action and allowed many to die unnecessarily because of the money they made from the milk.

Citation needed

actually Citations

Plural

As in, you need to bring a lot of them

Get a truck, fill it with citations, dump them here in front of me.

Working on it... I know it's here somewhere...

Who's poe btw?

Edgar Allan Poe?

Rented Tritium wrote:

DeadlySquirrel wrote:No, they get the black spot because they're right. There is no global warming. Even Al Gore came out and said it was a lie. It is the same with cancer.

It happened with the TB outbreak over here before pasteurisation. The government knew exactly what was causing the TB (milk) but didn't take action and allowed many to die unnecessarily because of the money they made from the milk.

Citation needed

actually Citations

Plural

As in, you need to bring a lot of them

Get a truck, fill it with citations, dump them here in front of me.

Do you really want to see his citations?

It will probably be some undergrad's paper from Glenn Beck University or Alex Jones.

Coolyo294 wrote:Edgar Allan Poe?

Oh, the writer

No, I am not a 19th Century Writer.

DeadlySquirrel wrote:
The UN's weather monitor is programmed to ALWAYS prove global warming is real, no matter what figures are put in it. It's a con to get taxes.

Monitoring climate conditions is about collecting data, not analyzing it.

Also, the UN doesn't collect taxes.

DeadlySquirrel wrote:
Any scientist who says otherwise is quickly silenced.

I mean, if a scientist told me that monitoring the weather was about anything other than data collection, I would probably not take his opinion seriously.

DeadlySquirrel wrote:
It's the same with cancer, any scientist who proves he can cure cancer with anything other than already prescribed treatments or shows that the prescribed treatments do more harm than good is quickly silenced.

The only people I've seen claim that cancer has been, or can easily be, cured are people who aren't scientists, and many are trying to sell you something.

Piston Honda wrote:

Rented Tritium wrote:

DeadlySquirrel wrote:No, they get the black spot because they're right. There is no global warming. Even Al Gore came out and said it was a lie. It is the same with cancer.

It happened with the TB outbreak over here before pasteurisation. The government knew exactly what was causing the TB (milk) but didn't take action and allowed many to die unnecessarily because of the money they made from the milk.

Citation needed

actually Citations

Plural

As in, you need to bring a lot of them

Get a truck, fill it with citations, dump them here in front of me.

Do you really want to see his citations?

It will probably be some undergrad's paper from Glenn Beck University or Alex Jones.

This is true, when I last pulled out my citations you all dismissed them instantly.

DeadlySquirrel wrote:No, they get the black spot because they're right. There is no global warming. Even Al Gore came out and said it was a lie. It is the same with cancer.

It happened with the TB outbreak over here before pasteurisation. The government knew exactly what was causing the TB (milk) but didn't take action and allowed many to die unnecessarily because of the money they made from the milk.

I wanted to use a gif here, but... I realized I wanted to slap myself more.

You mention the UN and global warming. Did you know that if you divided the entire UN budget between the scientists who believe global warming is happening, each one would roughly double their salary.

That's the entire UN budget to get there. I'm being quite charitable.

So you think that literally every climate scientist is so devoid of integrity that they'd sell out and keep a complete secret, insulting the name of science itself, for a pay raise. If we use the amount that actually deals with global warming, that's like 500 bucks per scientist. That's not going to buy silence.

DeadlySquirrel wrote:
This is true, when I last pulled out my citations you all dismissed them instantly.

I'm mostly interested in the citation for Al Gore publicly stating that global warming is a lie.

Rented Tritium wrote:You mention the UN and global warming. Did you know that if you divided the entire UN budget between the scientists who believe global warming is happening, each one would roughly double their salary.

That's the entire UN budget to get there. I'm being quite charitable.

So you think that literally every climate scientist is so devoid of integrity that they'd sell out and keep a complete secret, insulting the name of science itself, for a pay raise.

No, I'm saying the ones who do NOT support global warming don't get heard. So all you hear are the ones who have been bought-out and those who genuinely believe it.

Rented Tritium wrote:
So you think that literally every climate scientist is so devoid of integrity that they'd sell out and keep a complete secret, insulting the name of science itself, for a pay raise.

And a very small one, considering the money that would follow from speaking engagements tied to the cover-up itself.

DeadlySquirrel wrote:

Rented Tritium wrote:You mention the UN and global warming. Did you know that if you divided the entire UN budget between the scientists who believe global warming is happening, each one would roughly double their salary.

That's the entire UN budget to get there. I'm being quite charitable.

So you think that literally every climate scientist is so devoid of integrity that they'd sell out and keep a complete secret, insulting the name of science itself, for a pay raise.

No, I'm saying the ones who do NOT support global warming don't get heard. So all you hear are the ones who have been bought-out and those who genuinely believe it.

Bought out with what money? The ENTIRE UN BUDGET would not be enough for what you are saying.

Rented Tritium wrote:

DeadlySquirrel wrote:

Rented Tritium wrote:You mention the UN and global warming. Did you know that if you divided the entire UN budget between the scientists who believe global warming is happening, each one would roughly double their salary.

That's the entire UN budget to get there. I'm being quite charitable.

So you think that literally every climate scientist is so devoid of integrity that they'd sell out and keep a complete secret, insulting the name of science itself, for a pay raise.

No, I'm saying the ones who do NOT support global warming don't get heard. So all you hear are the ones who have been bought-out and those who genuinely believe it.

Bought out with what money? The ENTIRE UN BUDGET would not be enough for what you are saying.

You seriously think that funds used to bribe people would come out of the UN budget?

DeadlySquirrel wrote:

Rented Tritium wrote:

DeadlySquirrel wrote:

Rented Tritium wrote:You mention the UN and global warming. Did you know that if you divided the entire UN budget between the scientists who believe global warming is happening, each one would roughly double their salary.

That's the entire UN budget to get there. I'm being quite charitable.

So you think that literally every climate scientist is so devoid of integrity that they'd sell out and keep a complete secret, insulting the name of science itself, for a pay raise.

No, I'm saying the ones who do NOT support global warming don't get heard. So all you hear are the ones who have been bought-out and those who genuinely believe it.

Bought out with what money? The ENTIRE UN BUDGET would not be enough for what you are saying.

You seriously think that funds used to bribe people would come out of the UN budget?

Oh silly me, yes. I thought that.

I suppose they come out of the secret fund, a dark second budget larger than the first one that's only used by the negaUN, a secret body of mustache twirling villains. This is how they paid for the silence of tens of thousands of climate scientists.

Rented Tritium wrote:

DeadlySquirrel wrote:

Rented Tritium wrote:

DeadlySquirrel wrote:

Rented Tritium wrote:You mention the UN and global warming. Did you know that if you divided the entire UN budget between the scientists who believe global warming is happening, each one would roughly double their salary.

That's the entire UN budget to get there. I'm being quite charitable.

So you think that literally every climate scientist is so devoid of integrity that they'd sell out and keep a complete secret, insulting the name of science itself, for a pay raise.

No, I'm saying the ones who do NOT support global warming don't get heard. So all you hear are the ones who have been bought-out and those who genuinely believe it.

Bought out with what money? The ENTIRE UN BUDGET would not be enough for what you are saying.

You seriously think that funds used to bribe people would come out of the UN budget?

Oh silly me, yes. I thought that.

I suppose they come out of the secret fund, a dark second budget larger than the first one that's only used by the negaUN, a secret body of mustache twirling villains. This is how they paid for the silence of tens of thousands of climate scientists.

Something like that, but less silly.

DeadlySquirrel wrote:

Rented Tritium wrote:

DeadlySquirrel wrote:
You seriously think that funds used to bribe people would come out of the UN budget?

Oh silly me, yes. I thought that.

I suppose they come out of the secret fund, a dark second budget larger than the first one that's only used by the negaUN, a secret body of mustache twirling villains. This is how they paid for the silence of tens of thousands of climate scientists.

Something like that, but less silly.

Oh yes, the less silly version of the bizzaro UN with a secret larger budget than the regular one.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Has it occurred to you that the upkeep of a secret counter UN would end up being larger than any rewards reaped in their evil schemes?

Whatever, no point in arguing this

DeadlySquirrel wrote:Whatever, no point in arguing this

You're right.

But probably for different reasons that you think.

I think it is quite clear what he is saying the taxes collected from all the industrial nations are used to pay off all the scientists, in fact, I am willing to bet this is all a giant conspiracy and they use the money from blood diamonds to set up puppet professors in Universities across the globe to spread their propaganda.

How I never saw this before is beyond me.

DeadlySquirrel wrote:
Something like that, but less silly.

The problem with that is you just expand the web of people that need to be paid off. Tens of thousands of climate budget from secret black bag fund requires infrastructure, and a means of distributing that money. This means more people that are being pad off not to rat out the whole thing. Then you have to look at all the Nations of the UN, and their staff working with the UN and the number gets larger. All of these people are being paid directly from the black bag fund, or an organization that works directly with the black bag fund. Of course, this black bag fund had to come from somewhere, most likely member nations, and these nations further had to acquire their money from somewhere, which is to say taxes on their citizens.

Now because you're basically talking about an epic secret that everyone at the UN, and every government in the world is in one, you're talking about a huge number of people who need to be paid off. Even if you have the money, hiding that amount of money is ridiculously hard, and most likely impossible because taking it, ultimately from citizens, is a very public affair. I guess you could just print more money, but then we have to start paying of anyone with a stake in the market, which means we're talking about even more people, and even more money.

All of this is, presumably, about control. Which is a strange thing worry about considering that the present means of control are rather effective.

So the conspiracy requires leaders and budget makers from every UN contributing country (that is not a small list) and every single climate scientist to stay quiet.

I think that the Iranian president's theories about the holocaust are less silly than anything that you have posted about medicine, global warming, and mass conspiracies involving the UN and its scientists.

Actually, this is great news for DeadlySquirrel. If the conspiracy is spread that far, it should be very easy for him to get in by getting a degree and working for one of those climate scientists and getting some evidence. The larger it is, the easier it is to infiltrate it and prove it.

Godspeed, deadlysquirrel.

Rented Tritium wrote:Actually, this is great news for DeadlySquirrel. If the conspiracy is spread that far, it should be very easy for him to get in by getting a degree and working for one of those climate scientists and getting some evidence. The larger it is, the easier it is to infiltrate it and prove it.

Godspeed, deadlysquirrel.

He'll never infiltrate our organization rented, you know know that already... I mean what organization?

Rented Tritium wrote:So the conspiracy requires leaders and budget makers from every UN contributing country (that is not a small list) and every single climate scientist to stay quiet.

Then there's the whole thing about the people receiving the money actually spending it. Many of them will be nominally wealthy, but where all these scientists with estates in the Hamptons?

I mean, I guess they might not be allowed to spend the money, but then why take it?

Hahaha

Think of me as you will, but I will stand by my convictions.