Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/21 03:50:17
Subject: Blood Angels Vanguard Vets
|
 |
Beast Lord
|
Oh yeah that is true. You can't. Still though... it brings the question as to why would you? If you are going to assault from the vehicle anyway then why not just deep strike them by themselves?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/03/21 03:51:36
around 2500 points
600 points |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/21 12:57:45
Subject: Blood Angels Vanguard Vets
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
|
Mordechai wrote:Oh yeah that is true. You can't. Still though... it brings the question as to why would you? If you are going to assault from the vehicle anyway then why not just deep strike them by themselves?
For arguments sake you could use a drop pod for a turn 1 assault, but as it has already been proven they can't have this rule in a dp
|
DT:80S++++G+++M++B++IPw40k96#+D++A++++/mWD179R+++T(T)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/21 13:08:51
Subject: Re:Blood Angels Vanguard Vets
|
 |
Beast Lord
|
Well I was referring again to the Stormraven.
|
around 2500 points
600 points |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/22 08:41:55
Subject: Blood Angels Vanguard Vets
|
 |
Wolf Guard Bodyguard in Terminator Armor
|
Counts as deep striking is not deep striking. People don't like that reasoning, but it holds true.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/22 10:22:58
Subject: Blood Angels Vanguard Vets
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Brother Ramses wrote:Counts as deep striking is not deep striking. People don't like that reasoning, but it holds true.
This has been proven wrong in nearly every case I can think of. "counts as" means the same thing as "is".
Do you have any reason to believe this or example where something "counts as" something but isn't treated exactly the same as that thing? Otherwise, it just doesn't "count as" in fact.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/22 11:48:13
Subject: Blood Angels Vanguard Vets
|
 |
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
Agree with Nemesor Dave.
Everywhere in the rules, "counts as" means "functions for all purposes as being".
|
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/22 13:35:16
Subject: Blood Angels Vanguard Vets
|
 |
Plaguelord Titan Princeps of Nurgle
Alabama
|
Nemesor Dave wrote:Brother Ramses wrote:Counts as deep striking is not deep striking. People don't like that reasoning, but it holds true.
This has been proven wrong in nearly every case I can think of. "counts as" means the same thing as "is".
Do you have any reason to believe this or example where something "counts as" something but isn't treated exactly the same as that thing? Otherwise, it just doesn't "count as" in fact.
It used to be the old argument for models or unit that counted as Jump Infantry being the exact same as Jump Infantry. The FAQ put that line of reason to rest.
|
WH40K
Death Guard 5100 pts.
Daemons 3000 pts.
DT:70+S++G+M-B-I--Pw40K90-D++A++/eWD?R++T(D)DM+
28 successful trades in the Dakka Swap Shop! Check out my latest auction here!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/24 03:04:57
Subject: Blood Angels Vanguard Vets
|
 |
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard
|
Are you allowed disembark from a deepstriking vehicle?
The droppod says you have to and I don't have the rule book to hand so I wonder are you allowed to?
Since HI only allows you to assault only when you deep strike, if you can't disembark normally then you can't get out of the ship to assault in the first place.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/24 03:10:02
Subject: Blood Angels Vanguard Vets
|
 |
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
puma713 wrote:Nemesor Dave wrote:Brother Ramses wrote:Counts as deep striking is not deep striking. People don't like that reasoning, but it holds true.
This has been proven wrong in nearly every case I can think of. "counts as" means the same thing as "is".
Do you have any reason to believe this or example where something "counts as" something but isn't treated exactly the same as that thing? Otherwise, it just doesn't "count as" in fact.
It used to be the old argument for models or unit that counted as Jump Infantry being the exact same as Jump Infantry. The FAQ put that line of reason to rest.
What FAQ are you talking about? Models that count as Jump Infantry are indeed the exact same as Jump Infantry. There is, however, a difference between JI and models which "move as" JI. Automatically Appended Next Post: liturgies of blood wrote:Are you allowed disembark from a deepstriking vehicle?
The droppod says you have to and I don't have the rule book to hand so I wonder are you allowed to?
Of course. A DSing vehicle counts as moving at Cruising Speed. You can disembark from a vehicle moving at Cruising Speed. The pod rule is to make clear that you can't stay embarked.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/03/24 03:11:05
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/24 03:21:03
Subject: Blood Angels Vanguard Vets
|
 |
Plaguelord Titan Princeps of Nurgle
Alabama
|
Mannahnin wrote:puma713 wrote:
It used to be the old argument for models or unit that counted as Jump Infantry being the exact same as Jump Infantry. The FAQ put that line of reason to rest.
What FAQ are you talking about? Models that count as Jump Infantry are indeed the exact same as Jump Infantry. There is, however, a difference between JI and models which "move as" JI.
Right. People used to argue that models that "counted as" Jump Infantry were not affected by things that affected Jump Infantry because they were not, in fact, Jump Infantry, which is ridiculous.
The FAQ I am referring to is the Tyranid FAQ where it says that something with the Wings biomorph may deep strike. This further solidified the defense of the above argument, that even a monstrous creature that "moves as Jump Infantry" can deep strike.
|
WH40K
Death Guard 5100 pts.
Daemons 3000 pts.
DT:70+S++G+M-B-I--Pw40K90-D++A++/eWD?R++T(D)DM+
28 successful trades in the Dakka Swap Shop! Check out my latest auction here!
|
|
 |
 |
|