Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 06:41:22
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
ZebioLizard2 wrote:So everything goes back into the one book for everyone, gray knights go back to just being strike squads and terminators, as well as a just a captain/grand master option.
Without the fluff nothing would have changed for anything, and the fluff is what can have additional change. Else the blood angels would have just been the "One unique squad" and space wolves would have been the "Gray hunters with true grit!" option.
Kinda, but in reverse.
If a chapter has something unique about it, that makes it stand out from the other 999 chapters, then maybe it should get it's own dex. If you've got a cool idea, run with it and expand on it. So rather than simplifying it down to one core nugget, take that core and flesh it out.
Grey knights are all psykers with force weapons. They get a codex.
Space wolves are vikings in space, and very non-codex. Sure, they can have one too.
Blood Angels have Death Company and like punching things. It's a stretch, but whatever.
Black Templars are very non-codex, and have a handful of unique units, and they've got that whole crusade thing going on. They can have a codex.
Dark Angels.... well, they've got nothing that makes them stand out from the herd. At least, nothing that makes them stand out more than the other major chapters, like Salamanders or Relictors. Blood Ravens even.
I understand that any codex writer could jam more background in there, but why should Dark Angels get that treatment over the other chapters? Their core just isn't that different or interesting to start with.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/04/13 06:44:52
"Did you ever notice how in the Bible, when ever God needed to punish someone, or make an example, or whenever God needed a killing, he sent an angel? Did you ever wonder what a creature like that must be like? A whole existence spent praising your God, but always with one wing dipped in blood. Would you ever really want to see an angel?" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 07:03:42
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
[DCM]
Coastal Bliss in the Shadow of Sizewell
Suffolk, where the Aliens roam.
|
Aye but you are forgetting GW officially noted that they wouldn't reduce anymore Codexes after the gak they got thrown at them for Squats and the other 'multi codexes' they tried out in previous generations of 40K and fantasy.
Blood Angels as has been noted only had Death Company and Furiso dreads, the Baal Pred and Jump pack Honour guard to make them stand out before their current book. Special Characters as well of course.
Their new book added a few units and modified others to grant more unique ideas for the book.
Dark Angels will be the same, however Dark Angels already have Deathwing and Ravenwing to make them stand out, so by simply enhancing those two, adding a couple of new things (the Chaplain unit, much like the Sanguinary Priest squad, seems likely) and so on, and this book is really easy to justify.
I'm think thing Angels of Redemption fans wil be happy as well, as I'd be guessing they might get a Special Character leader/Captain at long last, ala Gabriel Seth.
On a side note, has any Dark Angel fans here grabbed the new paint set to have a look at the Marines that are blatently out of the 6th box?
Think I might pick on up today.
|
"That's not an Ork, its a girl.." - Last words of High General Daran Ul'tharem, battle of Ursha VII.
Two White Horses (Ipswich Town and Denver Broncos Supporter)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 08:07:05
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Morathi's Darkest Sin wrote:Aye but you are forgetting GW officially noted that they wouldn't reduce anymore Codexes after the gak they got thrown at them for Squats and the other 'multi codexes' they tried out in previous generations of 40K and fantasy.
Blood Angels as has been noted only had Death Company and Furiso dreads, the Baal Pred and Jump pack Honour guard to make them stand out before their current book. Special Characters as well of course.
Their new book added a few units and modified others to grant more unique ideas for the book.
Dark Angels will be the same, however Dark Angels already have Deathwing and Ravenwing to make them stand out, so by simply enhancing those two, adding a couple of new things (the Chaplain unit, much like the Sanguinary Priest squad, seems likely) and so on, and this book is really easy to justify.
I'm think thing Angels of Redemption fans wil be happy as well, as I'd be guessing they might get a Special Character leader/Captain at long last, ala Gabriel Seth.
On a side note, has any Dark Angel fans here grabbed the new paint set to have a look at the Marines that are blatently out of the 6th box?
Think I might pick on up today.
Yeah, almost all codexes were boring before their current 5th ed incarnation. Remember, DA is a 4th edition codex. Most of the things you are comparing them to are really quite new.
ALSO: They do have unique features:
Fearless Bikers with Teleport Homers who can take a Land Speeder. They also have Scout, so move them up and bring down some Terminators.
Fearless Terminators with a variable squad. Special version of drop pod assault, meaning that I can bring down 2 squads of Terminators from a 1000 point list on my first turn.
Being able to use these to bring down a ton of fearless Terminators backing up fearless bikers.
Being able to take both of the above as troops.
Yeah, I've seen the box set. Now I'm afraid they're going to put DA into the SM Codex, as in every starter box I've seen had SM.
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 08:13:03
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
[DCM]
Coastal Bliss in the Shadow of Sizewell
Suffolk, where the Aliens roam.
|
Well the rumour is Dark Angels are going to be in the 6th box, and there is also a rumour that GW is planning to make Dark Angels, 'stress Dark Angels' the poster boys for this edition. Not sure if that means staff will get Green Shirts instead of blue ones for Games Day? The models are supposed to have moulded pads, if this is correct, then this box is different as previously even when the box was themed around the other chapters, the pads where kept clean so any chapter symbol could be placed there by the buyer. If these figs do have Dark Angel Iconography on them, then a) they have to be from the 6th box, no way would they do a lone sprue for a paint set. b) It means they are concentrating on Dark Angels, if they where pulling Dark Angels back into the Marine book, they'd have left the Chapter pad blank.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/04/13 08:13:54
"That's not an Ork, its a girl.." - Last words of High General Daran Ul'tharem, battle of Ursha VII.
Two White Horses (Ipswich Town and Denver Broncos Supporter)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 08:50:37
Subject: Re:Dark Angels?
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
Grey knights are all psykers with force weapons. They get a codex.
They didn't get a codex till 5th edition. Before it was just Terminators (up till 3rd) Pure Terminator squads with a captain or grandmaster in terminator armor.
In 3rd they gained Strike squads, which don't have terminator armor. Infact by having them in 5th added to the "More power armor all the time"
Because even in 3rd edition their "force weapons" weren't ACTUAL FORCE WEAPONS. They gave a +2 strength bonus, and only the grand master could activate his as a force weapon. Heck the standard squads didn't even have a Power Weapon
Space wolves are vikings in space, and very non-codex. Sure, they can have one too.
Exactly how are space wolves non-codex. I really, Really would like to know, and vikings in space doesn't matter at all, it's just fluff remember.
Black Templars are very non-codex, and have a handful of unique units, and they've got that whole crusade thing going on. They can have a codex.
You mean like every other chapter? Black templars are more or less unique though comparatively, so I did give them a pass. They even have the holy hand grenade!  Can't wait to see what they gain later on though, I really want a horde power armor army.
I understand that any codex writer could jam more background in there, but why should Dark Angels get that treatment over the other chapters? Their core just isn't that different or interesting to start with.
Because it's easy to do with their current fluff, due to the examples I have given.
Yeah, I've seen the box set. Now I'm afraid they're going to put DA into the SM Codex, as in every starter box I've seen had SM.
2nd had blood angels
3rd edition had black templars
Both at the time were unique dex's independant from codex Ultramarines or Codex Vanilla.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2012/04/13 08:53:46
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 08:55:13
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
^ are you for reals?
Space Wolves are definently non-codex.
Reasons:
Wolf priests, take the roll of chaplains and apothecaries.
Rune priests, no librarians.
they have more than 10 companies, and they call them great companies.
their company leaders, called Wolf Lords, are basically independant, and only roll together from time to time.
there are probably other reasons too, but those are the ones i can think of off the top of my head.
|
Veteran Sergeant wrote:In the grim darkness of the far future, the guy with a rifle is the weakest man on the battlefield, left to quake in terror, hoping the two or three shots he gets do the job before somebody runs screaming across the battlefield to hit him with an energized stick.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/440996.page
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 09:07:50
Subject: Re:Dark Angels?
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
Reasons:
Wolf priests, take the roll of chaplains and apothecaries.
So they are chaplains and apocatharies with a different name.
Rune priests, no librarians.
Draw from the warp like any other psyker, acts as a librarian.
they have more than 10 companies, and they call them great companies.
Ooh, more companies, sure this is interesting but can it convert to gameplay?
their company leaders, called Wolf Lords, are basically independant, and only roll together from time to time.
So their captains don't interact, interesting.
Now how about how they fight? What they use in combat, you know, things that directly translate into gameplay? Afterall it's what the OP was asking too.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 09:25:15
Subject: Re:Dark Angels?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
ZebioLizard2 wrote:Now how about how they fight? What they use in combat, you know, things that directly translate into gameplay? Afterall it's what the OP was asking too.
True dat
|
"Did you ever notice how in the Bible, when ever God needed to punish someone, or make an example, or whenever God needed a killing, he sent an angel? Did you ever wonder what a creature like that must be like? A whole existence spent praising your God, but always with one wing dipped in blood. Would you ever really want to see an angel?" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 09:35:48
Subject: Re:Dark Angels?
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
Mainly one of my wishlisting things for more "Pre-heresy tech" Will translate to having Mortis Contemptor Dreadnoughts as a dex choice. Can't tell me that wouldn't be unique.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 11:02:50
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Wicked Warp Spider
A cave, deep in the Misty Mountains
|
Kaldor wrote:Their core just isn't that different or interesting to start with.
Opinion once again.
I'm not sure I want DA to be the posterboys. They would be a whole lot... well, less secretive.
|
Craftworld Eleuven 4500
LoneLictor on thread about an ork choking the Emperor:
LoneLictor wrote:I like to imagine the Emperor kills so many Orks that he ends up half buried beneath a pile of corpses, with only his head sticking out. A lone grot stumbles across him, and starts choking him.
Then Horus comes across the lone grot, somehow managing to kill the Emperor, and punts it into space. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 13:46:42
Subject: Re:Dark Angels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
@Morathi: Yeah, as far as I can tell they are sculpted pads, as they also seem to have the DA Tactical symbol on the opposite shoulder pad.
Anyway, back on topic, if DA are going to be in the next starter set, then they won't get rid of the codex. They'll probably replace the current one instead. Especially since they have bothered to convert the MotR into finecast and produced the DA vets box plus the Ravenwing.
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 16:09:09
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
Kaldor wrote:ZebioLizard2 wrote:So everything goes back into the one book for everyone, gray knights go back to just being strike squads and terminators, as well as a just a captain/grand master option.
Without the fluff nothing would have changed for anything, and the fluff is what can have additional change. Else the blood angels would have just been the "One unique squad" and space wolves would have been the "Gray hunters with true grit!" option.
Kinda, but in reverse.
If a chapter has something unique about it, that makes it stand out from the other 999 chapters, then maybe it should get it's own dex. If you've got a cool idea, run with it and expand on it. So rather than simplifying it down to one core nugget, take that core and flesh it out.
Grey knights are all psykers with force weapons. They get a codex.
Space wolves are vikings in space, and very non-codex. Sure, they can have one too.
Blood Angels have Death Company and like punching things. It's a stretch, but whatever.
Black Templars are very non-codex, and have a handful of unique units, and they've got that whole crusade thing going on. They can have a codex.
Dark Angels.... well, they've got nothing that makes them stand out from the herd. At least, nothing that makes them stand out more than the other major chapters, like Salamanders or Relictors. Blood Ravens even.
I understand that any codex writer could jam more background in there, but why should Dark Angels get that treatment over the other chapters? Their core just isn't that different or interesting to start with.
you mean they are no diferent appart from the whole list of things i already mentioned, and everyone else has mentioned, its clear you seem to be ignoring the fact that they are very diferent.
It seems you are saying "there is nothing to set them apart... apart from the things that clearly do"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 16:45:04
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Dark Angels are a more mature Marine codex, I think. Compared to the more "derp everything I have is slightly better than yours derp" BA and SW codexes, Dark Angels have a much more relaxed style/colour scheme.
That and Deathwing Terminators just look badass:
Got to love that bone-coloured colour scheme.
|
Unnessesarily extravegant word of the week award goes to jcress410 for this:
jcress wrote:Seem super off topic to complain about epistemology on a thread about tactics. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 17:11:04
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Dark Angels definitely deserve a new codes. They should be on par with BA and SW. I like their fluff and models (RW and robed Vets).
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 17:16:32
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
wuestenfux wrote:Dark Angels definitely deserve a new codes. They should be on par with BA and SW. I like their fluff and models (RW and robed Vets).
DA are misunderstood. They shall soon be the most OP codex EVAR. Something along the lines of:
A Venerable Dreadnought may replace his Dreadnought Close Combat Weapon with 15 Plasma Cannons. Just to really piss off your opponents...
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 17:21:42
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
BlapBlapBlap wrote:wuestenfux wrote:Dark Angels definitely deserve a new codes. They should be on par with BA and SW. I like their fluff and models (RW and robed Vets).
DA are misunderstood. They shall soon be the most OP codex EVAR. Something along the lines of:
A Venerable Dreadnought may replace his Dreadnought Close Combat Weapon with 15 Plasma Cannons. Just to really piss off your opponents...
A Predator with plasma cannon sponsons, a Razorback with plasma cannon turret, and a Speeder whose main weapon is a plasma cannon (see Sammael).
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 17:39:33
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
I think the contention between the parties comes down to how you have phrased your question:
Kaldor wrote:Do they really deserve a codex of their own?
Many would say that due to their detailed history, unique organisation (Deathwing, Ravenwing) that they do deserve a Codex. However your point appears to be that their current incarnation does not sufficiently distinguish the Chapter to warrant a standalone publication. Some clever special rules, and a few new units couldrectify this, pleasing both parties.
|
DR:90S+G+M++B++I+Pw40k00#-D+A++/mWD292R+T(M)DM+
FW Epic Bunker: £97,871.35. Overpriced at all?
Black Legion 8th Grand Company
Cadian XV Airborne "Flying Fifteens"
Order of the Ebon Chalice
Relictors 3rd Company |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 17:41:15
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
wuestenfux wrote:BlapBlapBlap wrote:wuestenfux wrote:Dark Angels definitely deserve a new codes. They should be on par with BA and SW. I like their fluff and models (RW and robed Vets).
DA are misunderstood. They shall soon be the most OP codex EVAR. Something along the lines of:
A Venerable Dreadnought may replace his Dreadnought Close Combat Weapon with 15 Plasma Cannons. Just to really piss off your opponents...
A Predator with plasma cannon sponsons, a Razorback with plasma cannon turret, and a Speeder whose main weapon is a plasma cannon (see Sammael).
A Predator may turn into a Skimmer if the Master of the Ravenwing lends the driver his Jetbike.
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 17:58:21
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
Testify wrote:Dark Angels are a more mature Marine codex, I think. Compared to the more "derp everything I have is slightly better than yours derp" BA and SW codexes, Dark Angels have a much more relaxed style/colour scheme.
That's a very polite way to say they have a bad codex. They just haven't gotten their Marines +1 treatment yet.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 19:33:09
Subject: Re:Dark Angels?
|
 |
[DCM]
Coastal Bliss in the Shadow of Sizewell
Suffolk, where the Aliens roam.
|
BlapBlapBlap wrote:@Morathi: Yeah, as far as I can tell they are sculpted pads, as they also seem to have the DA Tactical symbol on the opposite shoulder pad.
Anyway, back on topic, if DA are going to be in the next starter set, then they won't get rid of the codex. They'll probably replace the current one instead. Especially since they have bothered to convert the MotR into finecast and produced the DA vets box plus the Ravenwing.
Aye, this is why most of us are confidant the new book is coming.
Also picked up a box earlier in Ipswich, and yep, moulded Dark Angel symbols and their tactical style icon.
|
"That's not an Ork, its a girl.." - Last words of High General Daran Ul'tharem, battle of Ursha VII.
Two White Horses (Ipswich Town and Denver Broncos Supporter)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/13 19:58:53
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
My Deathwing are eager for 6th!
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/14 00:21:33
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
[DCM]
Coastal Bliss in the Shadow of Sizewell
Suffolk, where the Aliens roam.
|
Aye, will be good to have them on the table again. Thought I'd share this for folks, the sprue from the painting box in case they'd not seen it.
If you click on the pic, it'll take you to the Dakka Gallery where you can zoom in to see the symbols much clearer.
|
"That's not an Ork, its a girl.." - Last words of High General Daran Ul'tharem, battle of Ursha VII.
Two White Horses (Ipswich Town and Denver Broncos Supporter)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/14 01:39:19
Subject: Re:Dark Angels?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
But, no robes?
|
"Did you ever notice how in the Bible, when ever God needed to punish someone, or make an example, or whenever God needed a killing, he sent an angel? Did you ever wonder what a creature like that must be like? A whole existence spent praising your God, but always with one wing dipped in blood. Would you ever really want to see an angel?" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/14 01:57:32
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Don't only Veterans get robes? Maybe they'll have vets instead of termies.
|
Unnessesarily extravegant word of the week award goes to jcress410 for this:
jcress wrote:Seem super off topic to complain about epistemology on a thread about tactics. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/14 02:11:55
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Maniacal Gibbering Madboy
octarius sector squishin bugz
|
Testify wrote:Dark Angels are a more mature Marine codex, I think. Compared to the more "derp everything I have is slightly better than yours derp" BA and SW codexes, Dark Angels have a much more relaxed style/colour scheme.
That and Deathwing Terminators just look badass:
Got to love that bone-coloured colour scheme.
Not even gonna lie those Deathwing Terminators make terminators from other chapters look soft!!!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/14 07:08:25
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Testify wrote:Don't only Veterans get robes? Maybe they'll have vets instead of termies.
NO. JUST NO.
One of the main reasons and coolest things about DA is the Deathwing Terminator. As in, it's a major part of the Chapter organization. If you deleted or retconned Terminators, there would be blood.
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/14 08:55:44
Subject: Re:Dark Angels?
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
lets face it, if its DW its just cooler, enjoy
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/14 09:00:59
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Why the last picture?
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/14 09:16:12
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
BlapBlapBlap wrote:Why the last picture?
I was just thinking the same thing. Perhaps it is a member of the Fallen..?
|
I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member. -Groucho Marx
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/14 09:26:08
Subject: Dark Angels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
ShatteredBlade wrote:BlapBlapBlap wrote:Why the last picture?
I was just thinking the same thing. Perhaps it is a member of the Fallen..?
No, it's treacherous terrain. It's a fallen stronghold!
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
 |
 |
|