Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/09 21:11:48
Subject: Why the hate for a Futuristic looking Imperial Force?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
Here http://necrontyronline.freeforums.org/new-wip-necron-units-from-forgeworld-shown-at-games-day-t1927.html
As for the subject at bay, I am 100% fine with futuristic IG, while my army is very WW1 looking, I give them lots of gear, I don't like gearless soldiers.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/09 21:18:04
Subject: Re:Why the hate for a Futuristic looking Imperial Force?
|
 |
Pyro Pilot of a Triach Stalker
|
I'd love a futuristic looking guard force (I mean there has to be some planets that aren't stone age in technology).
I seem to remember someone using the SoB rules to create a futuristic guard force where things like faith points represented personal shields and the stats were correct for non-transhumans using power armor and such.
|
01001000 01100001 01101001 01101100 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110010 00100000 01001110 01100101 01100011 01110010 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101111 01110110 01100101 01110010 01101100 01101111 01110010 01100100 01110011 00100001 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/09 21:26:02
Subject: Re:Why the hate for a Futuristic looking Imperial Force?
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
buddha wrote:I'd love a futuristic looking guard force (I mean there has to be some planets that aren't stone age in technology).
I seem to remember someone using the SoB rules to create a futuristic guard force where things like faith points represented personal shields and the stats were correct for non-transhumans using power armor and such.
You sound like you'd fit right in playing a Stormtrooper Company. If only they'd make a list for that. :(
|
Click here for my Swap Shop post - I'm buying stuff!
DR:90-S++G++M+B++I+Pw40kPbfg99#+D++A++/eWDR++T(T)DM+
Black Legion/Iron Warriors/Night Lords Inquisitorial Friends & Co. (Inq, GK, Elysians, Assassins) Elysian Droptroops, soon-to-add Armored Battlegroup Adeptus Mechanicus Forge World Lucius
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/09 21:45:27
Subject: Why the hate for a Futuristic looking Imperial Force?
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Enigwolf wrote: Kanluwen wrote:
You're hearing that wrong then.
Imperial Armour 12 is a focus on the Minotaurs Chapter fighting an emergent Tomb World. The Death Korps are going to play secondstring to the Minotaurs.
The Dark Eldar are purported to be part of the subsequent book, where they begin to raid the sector at large. IA12 is not to be a "single world in peril" but an entire sector.
Any idea if IA12 onwards (for a few books) is going to be something akin to what they did with the multi-part Siege of Vraks or Badab War?
That's the intended goal as of a few months ago. That is subject to change, as "Raid on Kastorel-Novem" was supposed to be the same thing.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/04 17:32:16
Subject: Why the hate for a Futuristic looking Imperial Force?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Lynata wrote:I'd say that there is still a certain "style" that goes along with the Guard, and that it is possible to loot "out of place" in a setting like 40k. As madtankbloke and Enigwolf wrote, even the best-trained and best-equipped troops in the Imperium - Space Marines, Battle Sisters, Skitarii, Storm Troopers - still have a look that, depending on the specific faction in question, is situated somewhere between gothic and retro.
GW's own take on the Elysians looks a bit different to Forgeworld's interpretation, too. Just look at the images here: http://web.archive.org/web/20040705053654/http://www.armageddon3.com/English/Campaign/Troops/elysian_drop.html
As for "elite spec ops" Guard where "few will change the course of the battle", I'd say that this is already beyond the scope of individual regiments, concerning Storm Troopers and Grenadier units. The only thing that could come remotely close to being an entire army of "spec ops" are Cadian Shock Troops, and even there I'm not sure whether I would agree with the term.
That Elysian artwork is old; Everything looked different in the old artwork, including Cadians.
Futuristic does not always mean spec ops and happybright. I mean lets look at Halo; its a clean futuristic setting but that doesn't mean everything is happy, UNSC marines die by the battalions, some of whom suffer the horrible fate of being turned into flood and planets are lost at systems at a time via covenant glassing. Also, you can look at Judge Dredd, which is gritty and yet still boasts the advanced high tech setting.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/04 19:50:45
Subject: Re:Why the hate for a Futuristic looking Imperial Force?
|
 |
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker
|
It's just economics. The guardsmen is worth infinitely less than his equipment. You just can't afford the tech of a future soldier for trillions of men. Procreating is cheaper than a bullet casing in the 41st millenium.
|
I need to return some video tapes.
Skulls for the Skull Throne |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/05 03:43:22
Subject: Re:Why the hate for a Futuristic looking Imperial Force?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Goat wrote:It's just economics. The guardsmen is worth infinitely less than his equipment. You just can't afford the tech of a future soldier for trillions of men. Procreating is cheaper than a bullet casing in the 41st millenium.
Not true, look at the Harakoni Warhawks, Catachans, Elysians, Phantine Air Corp and many other regiments; It all depends on the world. On the other hand, you get incompetent regiments/commanders such as Chenkov or really hard core ones like the DKOK, where they spend lives like bullets.
Also expendable = wasting. As lord castor says, he does not waste men, he uses them to their fullest. They may/will die, but that risk is always present
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/05 03:57:21
Subject: Why the hate for a Futuristic looking Imperial Force?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
Krieg officers do not like wasting men either.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/05/05 04:11:03
Subject: Why the hate for a Futuristic looking Imperial Force?
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
Guelph Ontario
|
But Krieg Officers are chosen from the survivors of the Grenadiers. You know, the guys who have to spearhead every assault and their survival rate is lower than a conscript?
|
Think of something clever to say. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/05 04:24:57
Subject: Why the hate for a Futuristic looking Imperial Force?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
Yes, doesn't mean they'll charge an entrenched position just for the heck of it, however if they need a distraction that will prove to be extremely dangerous then they'll have more than enough volunteers.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|