Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

The apothacary, painboy, champ etc. all have different names, same stat lines no upgrades from their privious title. Seems like a standard to me. Yes rather than doing errata they did an FAQ...that is GW for you.

Not one of those examples is relevant as in all those cases the upgrades specify who they are available to.

So again you fail to identify a single valid reason that the FaQ for Furioso Librarians is apparently all about Furioso Dread options rather than about the Furioso Libby option. Sorry but your argument is ludicrous and baseless. The Libby is not allowed extra gear because he swaps all his gear as per the FaQ.

 Happyjew wrote:
Steelmage. Maybe there is some misunderstanding here. You are claiming that a Painboy (or an apothecary) can not take options that are reserved for Nobz (or Veterans) but can take them before upgrading to a Painboy (or apothecary).

Correct, as they are Nobs/Veterans at that point and thus have access to said options.

Just as I said in my first post;

No, an Apothecary cannot partake in the options reserved for Veterans.....but said Apothecary CAN make use of those options while he is still a Veteran, ie before upgrading to Apothecary.

There is no inherent order of operations assigned to the various upgrades.

As long as you don't switch out his Bolt Pistol, which you will need to trade in for the Narthecium, you can upgrade a Veteran-soon-to-be-Apothecary to your hearts content....and THEN upgrade him to an Apothecary.

....

 FlingitNow wrote:

The apothacary, painboy, champ etc. all have different names, same stat lines no upgrades from their privious title. Seems like a standard to me. Yes rather than doing errata they did an FAQ...that is GW for you.

Not one of those examples is relevant as in all those cases the upgrades specify who they are available to.

So again you fail to identify a single valid reason that the FaQ for Furioso Librarians is apparently all about Furioso Dread options rather than about the Furioso Libby option. Sorry but your argument is ludicrous and baseless. The Libby is not allowed extra gear because he swaps all his gear as per the FaQ.

All you have done is same my argument is flawed, you haen't done anything to support your side. My examples are far closer to what is actually happening than your stick waving.

Ok here's what we know:

1. Some options are only available to certain models with in an entry. In every case the option tells you which models this applies to if restricted.

2. Some options are available to every model in an entry.

3. The Furioso options do not mention that they are restricted to a particular model.

4. The Furioso Libby option contains a "replaces all" clause.


5. We know the FaQ clarifies what is meant by what is written. In this case it clarifies the options may not be selected by the Furioso Libby.

Your conclusion: That the FaQ is clarifying that options are only available to certain models even when they don't tell us and therefore the Furioso Libby can't take these options.

My conclusion: The FaQ clarifies how the "replaces all" clause works.

See how my conclusion follows logically and how yours is nonsense based on assumption not on what is actually said. So please either add a new point or explain which of the 5 above is wrong, or concede.