Switch Theme:

Sanguinor's Blessing  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
Does the Sanguinor's Blessing affect allied sergeants?
Yes, it does, provided they are Battle Brothers.
No, it does not.
Maybe/other/confused/don't know

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Dakka Veteran





 DeathReaper wrote:
jdjamesdean@mail.com wrote:
 DeathReaper wrote:
Not flawed.

"The Blood Angels army list is split into five sections: HQ, Elites, Troops, Fast Attack and Heavy Support. All of the squads, vehicles and characters in the army are placed into one of these sections..."(81)

Note the underlined section is really the defining language.

If The Sanguinor is from the Blood Angels army list, and it falls into one of the 5 categories (Which of course The Sanguinor does as he is an HQ), then he is in the army, and his rules that say army refer to the units in one of the five sections.

Proof of what army means in the context of the Blood Angels book.


That's a blood angels army list, ok. That is nice and all, however "Your Army" also includes any allies. IIRC his rule states your army, not your BA side, not your primary/secondary, etc.

Again, look at the FAQ's. They've clearly spelled out cases they didn't want it to apply to whilst leaving others open.

It does state your army for the Sanguinor's rule, but what does that mean?

In context that means any model from the blood Angels codex.

Remember the BA codex says "All of the squads, vehicles and characters in the army are placed into one of these sections..."(81)

Note the underlined. it clearly states the army, and in context that means from the blood angel army list.

As far as the BA codex is concerned, "the army" is "The Blood Angels army list" which is "split into five sections" and "All of the squads, vehicles and characters" " are placed into one of these sections"

Do not ignore the context of the BA codex and what it defines as "the army"


Simply put the context of what an army is changed in 6th edition from what it meant in 5th edition.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 DeathReaper wrote:
That still does not alter the context of the Sanguinor's rule.

The Sanguinor's rule is clearly not referencing allied units.


The context NOW is one that includes armies with allies who can also be friendly and have sergents.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/06/21 23:06:44


"The objective of the game is to win. The purpose of the game is to have fun. The two should not be confused."



 ErikSetzer wrote:

Or you can just claim it's all bad luck and you're really the best player in the world if not for those dice and/or cards.
 
   
Made in us
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw




Stephens City, VA

 DeathReaper wrote:
That still does not alter the context of the Sanguinor's rule.

The Sanguinor's rule is clearly not referencing allied units.


Except it does, within the context of the rules.

   
Made in us
Douglas Bader






 DeathReaper wrote:
That still does not alter the context of the Sanguinor's rule.

The Sanguinor's rule is clearly not referencing allied units.


And what you keep ignoring is that, in GW's opinion, it does reference allied units when you apply it to 6th. That's why similar rules had to get errata to include "from X codex".

There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. 
   
Made in us
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair






 Peregrine wrote:
 DeathReaper wrote:
That still does not alter the context of the Sanguinor's rule.

The Sanguinor's rule is clearly not referencing allied units.


And what you keep ignoring is that, in GW's opinion, it does reference allied units when you apply it to 6th. That's why similar rules had to get errata to include "from X codex".


And what you are ignoring is that there is no such model in any codex as a "sergeant".

The rule is either moot or is expanded to mean "Sergeants"(Space marine Sergeant, Assault Marine Sergeant, Terminator Sergeant, and Scout Sergeant) in the Blood angels codex only, or no models at all.

We either read it as written("Sergeant" models, of which there are none).

Or we read it as it was intended at time of writing: Space marine Sergeant, Assault Marine Sergeant, Terminator Sergeant, and Scout Sergeant in the Blood angels codex.


This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.



 
   
Made in us
Douglas Bader






 Kommissar Kel wrote:
And what you are ignoring is that there is no such model in any codex as a "sergeant".


Sure there is. My IG codex has several of them who will gladly benefit from even this extremely narrow interpretation of the rules.

Also, this is only a "problem" if you don't understand plain English. A "space marine sergeant" is a type of sergeant, just like a plasma gun is obviously a type of plasma weapon even if that GK plasma-at-BS-1 thing doesn't explicitly list a plasma gun.

The rule is either moot or is expanded to mean "Sergeants"(Space marine Sergeant, Assault Marine Sergeant, Terminator Sergeant, and Scout Sergeant) in the Blood angels codex only, or no models at all.


This is a false dilemma fallacy. You're ignoring the third option: it includes all sergeants in your army, like the rule says.

There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. 
   
Made in us
Hellish Haemonculus






Boskydell, IL

 Peregrine wrote:
 Kommissar Kel wrote:
And what you are ignoring is that there is no such model in any codex as a "sergeant".


Sure there is. My IG codex has several of them who will gladly benefit from even this extremely narrow interpretation of the rules.


Wow. I forgot that IG and Blood Angels are Battle Brothers. Yeah, it should apply to them too.

Ok, so I borrowed a BRB (mine was recently destroyed in a flood) so I can finally come down with some quotes.

BRB p112 wrote:Battle Brothers are treated as 'friendly units' from all points of view. This means, for example, that Battle Brothers:

Are counted as being friendly units for the targeting of psychic powers, abilities, and so on.


I think that's about as plain as it gets. The Sanguinor's Blessing ability, by RAW, should affect Black Templars, Blood Angels, Dark Angels, Imperial Guard, Vanilla Marines, and Space Wolves.

Welcome to the Freakshow!

(Leadership-shenanigans for Eldar of all types.) 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: