Switch Theme:

Getting a gaming PC.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Excellent Exalted Champion of Chaos






Lake Forest, California, South Orange County

Another note about GPUs, while 256-bit is of course preferred, most current games can only take advantage of 1GB of dedicated RAM. So 2GB cards are a little future proof, but anything more than that is just for bragging rights at this stage.

Benchmarks are designed to stress every last little spec, but in reality games are nowhere near those benchmarks in quality.

"Bryan always said that if the studio ever had to mix with the manufacturing and sales part of the business it would destroy the studio. And I have to say – he wasn’t wrong there! ... It’s become the promotions department of a toy company." -- Rick Priestly
 
   
Made in us
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan






Pleasant Valley, Iowa

 djones520 wrote:
So my current PC has this.

Pentium(r) Dual-Core CPU E5700 3.00GHz.
ATI Radeon HD4600 1gb


If you're looking at the 770GTX, you better check your power supply first. It will require a 600 watt minimum PSU and with the age of those components you may have a PSU that won't supply enough voltage on the 12V rail.

I think it's a great card and if I were buying a card right now, it's what I would buy ( the 4gb models only). However the next lineup should be released imminently and I intend to wait for that, and as long as it looks like you've waited, you might want to consider it as well.

 Aerethan wrote:
Another note about GPUs, while 256-bit is of course preferred, most current games can only take advantage of 1GB of dedicated RAM. So 2GB cards are a little future proof.


I know you said "most" and I'm not trying to be TFG but it seems worth pointing out due to it's popularity - that Battlefield 4 will use 3gb right now, today, if it's available. So if that specific title is one of the reasons you are upgrading...




This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/02/10 02:18:17


 lord_blackfang wrote:
Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.

 Flinty wrote:
The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
 
   
Made in us
Fate-Controlling Farseer





Fort Campbell

Yeah, ahead of you on that Ouze. I just cracked the case open, and I just need to throw this dinosaur away. 250w power supply.

I'm going to run out to Bestbuy tomorrow just to look at stuffs. Maybe I'll pick up a new power supply.

Ok, so how vital is 8gb of ram? I've got 4 currently, do I really need 8?

Full Frontal Nerdity 
   
Made in us
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan






Pleasant Valley, Iowa

I would aim for 8 but that's going to vary a lot depending on what you are playing. I'm using 2.5gb on my x86 work laptop right now with just Windows, Chrome, and my work related stuff open (outlook, spreadsheets, some proprietary stuff), so gaming would be a tough proposition.

 lord_blackfang wrote:
Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.

 Flinty wrote:
The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
 
   
Made in us
Fate-Controlling Farseer





Fort Campbell

Ok, so just pick up 2 chips then. That's hardly going to be the most expensive part of this. The processor and GPU are going to be the PITA's of the whole affair....

Full Frontal Nerdity 
   
Made in us
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan






Pleasant Valley, Iowa

I always struggle with spending $400 for a pretty solid card that will last me 4 or so years, or $250 for a card that will be good for a year and adequate for another. I tend to go for the former but there is a fair argument to be had for the latter as well - rotating out less expensive cards more frequently will get you a better, more even overall performance average I bet, rather than going from Great to Good to fair to subpar.

Although if it wasn't for BF4, I bet I could make my card last one more year or until Everquest Next launches, whatever comes first.


This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/02/10 02:34:45


 lord_blackfang wrote:
Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.

 Flinty wrote:
The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
 
   
Made in us
Excellent Exalted Champion of Chaos






Lake Forest, California, South Orange County

 Ouze wrote:
I would aim for 8 but that's going to vary a lot depending on what you are playing. I'm using 2.5gb on my x86 work laptop right now with just Windows, Chrome, and my work related stuff open (outlook, spreadsheets, some proprietary stuff), so gaming would be a tough proposition.


Please note, x86(32-bit Windows) will only recognize 3.5GB of RAM. If you want to use more than that, you MUST have x64 installed.

You will notice a major difference in online games with 8GB vs. 4GB.

"Bryan always said that if the studio ever had to mix with the manufacturing and sales part of the business it would destroy the studio. And I have to say – he wasn’t wrong there! ... It’s become the promotions department of a toy company." -- Rick Priestly
 
   
Made in us
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan






Pleasant Valley, Iowa

I'm well aware of PAE limitations. My home board has had 8gb since 2007.

My work laptop is restricted to a 32 bit build because that's all they had free licenses for. Lame beyond words. The motherboard supports 8gb.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/02/10 03:03:00


 lord_blackfang wrote:
Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.

 Flinty wrote:
The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
 
   
Made in us
Excellent Exalted Champion of Chaos






Lake Forest, California, South Orange County

I was aiming that more at Djones, as it's not a commonly known issue with new builders.

"Bryan always said that if the studio ever had to mix with the manufacturing and sales part of the business it would destroy the studio. And I have to say – he wasn’t wrong there! ... It’s become the promotions department of a toy company." -- Rick Priestly
 
   
Made in us
Powerful Pegasus Knight





Omaha

I have a ASUS Maximus Mother board, a intel i7-3770K Processor, a Radeon 7950 Video card, a cooler master 850 power supply and 16gb ram. 64 bit windows. I built it about a year ago and still runs many new games flawlessly. Great Fps and stays cool even when running 24-7 for months.

I really like Quad core and at the current moment nothing needs 6 and 8 cores to run it smoothly. Same with ram, 16 is all you really need, 32 is over kill as of now, and even 16 is a bit much.

Most computer build come from personal experience as to what you put in them. I have had bad luck with Intel Video cards and my friend who has been building computers for decades now says not to get them. Their quality has dropped a lot over the past few years and I have personally had them blow up after not much time. The Radeon is now my number 1 choice. As for Processors, I really like the Intels... Completely backwards here, my other friend loves the AMDs but I have never had a problem with the Intels so I countinue with them.

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal, it is the courage to continue that counts."  
   
Made in au
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests






Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.

 Ouze wrote:
I always struggle with spending $400 for a pretty solid card that will last me 4 or so years, or $250 for a card that will be good for a year and adequate for another.


With my last PC I had the choice of getting a 256mb graphics card or for half the price a 128mb graphics card. I went with the 128mb, and regretted it within a couple of years. This is why I went double Titans this time. No half measures.

Industrial Insanity - My Terrain Blog
"GW really needs to understand 'Less is more' when it comes to AoS." - Wha-Mu-077

 
   
Made in us
Excellent Exalted Champion of Chaos






Lake Forest, California, South Orange County

 H.B.M.C. wrote:
 Ouze wrote:
I always struggle with spending $400 for a pretty solid card that will last me 4 or so years, or $250 for a card that will be good for a year and adequate for another.


With my last PC I had the choice of getting a 256mb graphics card or for half the price a 128mb graphics card. I went with the 128mb, and regretted it within a couple of years. This is why I went double Titans this time. No half measures.


Well that escalated quickly.

Your last PC had a 128MB card and you went to 2x Titan cards. Love it.

"Bryan always said that if the studio ever had to mix with the manufacturing and sales part of the business it would destroy the studio. And I have to say – he wasn’t wrong there! ... It’s become the promotions department of a toy company." -- Rick Priestly
 
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: