Switch Theme:

Dark Eldar Lack of LoW...sign of things to come?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Esteemed Veteran Space Marine







 SHUPPET wrote:
Like Logan grimnarr on a freaking sleigh suited Space a wolves for a LoW

No, they didn't do it because they were lazy


P.S. What do you mean "outside of Vect, a LoW just doesn't fit"? Nobody is saying that Sliscus should have been LoW, the statement being made here is that Vect was cut from the dex instead of being moved to LoW and that it shows the laziness and gives zero incentive to move to a new dex with not a single new unit, merely a bunch of nerfs to every bodies old army so that GW can move a bunch of old kits. Anyone supporting this release is the only reason GW gets away with this trash lool


I've said it before, I'll say it again.... Logan Claus perfectly fits the Space Wolf army in just about every way. A) It has wolves, B) it has a viking vibe, C) it delivers their greatest warrior directly into the midst of combat. Does it look a little goofy and over the top? Sure, but then so does 2/3 of the Space Wolf model range.

You apparently misunderstood what I said. Outside of a LoW Vect, what else really fits the DE fluff and play style? Any super heavy walker or tank-like vehicle does not in any way fit. While there might be the occasional one-off bit of fluff here an d there that has something huge, by and large, DE are simply not known for what are generally considered super heavy vehicles. That leaves "uber" characters, of which Vect would have been a perfect addition. Nobody is saying it wasn't lazy on GW's part to not introduce a new LoW Vect model, just saying that is really the only thing that would have worked and made sense.
   
Made in au
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan





Sure OK then so it's a completely irrelevant statement posted in a manner that made it seem as though you were disagreeing with the talk of it being a bad thing that we didn't get a LoW


 ClassicCarraway wrote:
As many have already said, outside of Vect, a LoW just doesn't fit the DE army.



Because why would any of this talk about the codex not getting a LoW be about anybody but Vect, pretty sure that's pretty clear. All the other LoW codex units that we are comparing the decision to give us nothing to, are a characters, why would we suddenly be talking about some stupid DE Heavy walker lol

P.S.A. I won't read your posts if you break it into a million separate quotes and make an eyesore of it. 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: