Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/12 17:19:54
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
Of course it has bearing. Just because you disagree doesn't make you right. Mind you in playing narrative this is not what I would bring.
I'm not sure where it states you must have 100% of your army to call it a IronJawz for example. It does unlock battle line in some cases.
NinthMusketeer wrote: thejughead wrote:Call it what you want. It's a Khorne army to me. I don't have KBB benefits right now so I'll take it.
NinthMusketeer wrote: thejughead wrote:So 500 points of other Chaos elements, and 1500 points of Khorne Mortals and you say it ain't Khorne, right. Oh Dakka!
I'm not sure why this seems strange... By the rules I cannot mix in 25% Beastclaws with Ironjawz and call it an 'Ironjawz army' so why does Khorne get an exemption? If it were something like a Ghorgon mixed in then sure, I'd call it a Khorne army, but a LoC is about as un-Khorney as it gets. And that's the greater point; the army requires key components that are not Khorne to make the Khorne part of it work, so it has a crutch.
Ok, then your argument has no bearing in regards to Auticus' point that Khorne armies rate as mediocre. It seems the statement is "by my personal standards Khorne armies are not mediocre" rather than a comment on Matched Play as a whole.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/12 17:41:19
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
That's... Exactly what it kind of means, having the proper keyword that grants 'Allegiance'.
Though now I kind of want to see mixed allegiance, Bloodbound and Daemons for example, a big ol' happy fightin family.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/09/12 17:42:08
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/12 17:50:05
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
Ah right, but since KBB doesn't have specific traits I'm ok with Chaos.
ZebioLizard2 wrote:That's... Exactly what it kind of means, having the proper keyword that grants 'Allegiance'.
Though now I kind of want to see mixed allegiance, Bloodbound and Daemons for example, a big ol' happy fightin family.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/12 18:30:27
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Yeah, slaves to darkness, bloodbound and khorne demons all have the same 'allegiance' Chaos and yuo can even all have the same Khorne keyword (give slaves khorne keyword). Not like that is either 'mixed' or illegal from a matched play point of view.
Narrowing it down won't give 'allegiance abilities' though it might be useful if you really want to get the bloodcrusher battleline or something.
The reason I have gone for the bloodbound is so that I can also pull in slaves and demons and still have a fluffy khorne army. Of course I don't really care for competition etc, so that isn't an issue.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/12 18:46:16
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Clousseau
|
To be clear when I'm talking about the faction being mediocre overall in competitive environments I am referring to a force that is composed strictly of mortal khorne models.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/12 22:37:49
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
|
By the rules a Khorne army means everything has the Khorne keyword. So yeah, your argument has no bearing on the merits of a Khorne army in matched play.
|
Road to Renown! It's like classic Path to Glory, but repaired, remastered, expanded! https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/778170.page
I chose an avatar I feel best represents the quality of my post history.
I try to view Warhammer as more of a toolbox with examples than fully complete games. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/13 05:18:54
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
NinthMusketeer wrote:By the rules a Khorne army means everything has the Khorne keyword. So yeah, your argument has no bearing on the merits of a Khorne army in matched play.
Show me the rule that says that
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/13 05:33:10
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
|
thejughead wrote:NinthMusketeer 701698 8898375 Auticus 211afa2976e6121db7b333df53eb5aee.jpg wrote:By the rules a Khorne army means everything has the Khorne keyword. So yeah, your argument has no bearing on the merits of a Khorne army in matched play.
Show me the rule that says that 
I'll bow out of this line of discussion at this point, its pretty clear to me that you don't have an argument anymore.
|
Road to Renown! It's like classic Path to Glory, but repaired, remastered, expanded! https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/778170.page
I chose an avatar I feel best represents the quality of my post history.
I try to view Warhammer as more of a toolbox with examples than fully complete games. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/13 09:26:35
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Arch Magos w/ 4 Meg of RAM
|
As an observer here, I think both sides are being a tiny bit pedantic.  We can safely say, Bloodbound with some additions can be a very competitive army.
|
Bye bye Dakkadakka, happy hobbying! I really enjoyed my time on here. Opinions were always my own :-) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/13 12:10:20
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
NinthMusketeer wrote: thejughead wrote:NinthMusketeer 701698 8898375 Auticus 211afa2976e6121db7b333df53eb5aee.jpg wrote:By the rules a Khorne army means everything has the Khorne keyword. So yeah, your argument has no bearing on the merits of a Khorne army in matched play.
Show me the rule that says that 
I'll bow out of this line of discussion at this its pretty clear to me that you don't have an argument anymore.
Lulz! who says I'm arguing with you. If I want to play my Bloodbound with chaos allies where does it says I can't? All it restricts me is access to Traits and possible artifacts in the future.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/09/13 12:14:25
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/13 12:17:21
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Clousseau
|
By the rules you absolutely can.
But that wouldn't be strictly speaking a Bloodbound army. That would be an army with some Bloodbound elements in it.
To be competitive, a Bloodbound army pretty much requires outside elements added to it because a pure Bloodbound army is not going to cut it against some of the acutely busted forces one can create (the three I see a lot of are the newest ogor release frost horn "army" (loosely called army because its typically very low model co unt), the skyhammer stormcast formation where they just show up and charge alongside one or two stardrakes doling out platefuls of mortal wounds, and the skaven stormfiend mortal wound spam force with misc extras)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/13 12:56:18
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Well, its perfectly fine to enhance a Bloodbound army with some mortal Khorne units like Marauders or Chaos Knights. This is similar to mixing Sylvaneth with Wanderers.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/13 12:59:19
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
To be fair, mixing factions within an allegiance is perfectly acceptable, just calling it a pure bloodbound is rather weird when your including Tzeentch.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/09/13 13:04:32
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/13 13:12:32
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
I definitely didn't say Pure Bloodbound.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/13 14:09:42
Subject: Khorne Bloodbound expansion
|
 |
Clousseau
|
I'm not contending that mixing a faction with another is bad or wrong at all.
I'm just clarifying what I mean when I say a khorne bloodbound army.
When I say a khorne bloodbound army is mediocre, I'm referring to an army that is composed entirely of khorne bloodbound.
Otherwise I'd just say a chaos army with some khorne in it and some demons in it etc.
|
|
 |
 |
|