Switch Theme:

Is Roboute Guilliman a better ruler than the Emperor?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in se
Stubborn Hammerer





Sweden

A builder of Empires and a civilized organiser at heart. Guilliman is meant to embody some of the better aspects of the Romans: That of ability to adapt by organizing themselves systematically, and of efficient rule resulting in winning the peace.

The breaking up of the Legiones Astartes into Chapters mirrors the slimming down (and inflation) of Roman Legions during Late Antiquity. The good governance of the Realm of Ultramar mirrors the skilled rule of Augustus Caesar after the civil wars.

Having Guilliman as the saviour of the Imperium after the Horus Heresy always made a lot of sense: Much like the Romans (Byzantines), the Imperium is able to carry on against staggering odds at numerous fronts, and occassionally carry the offensive thanks to sheer ability to organize itself efficiently.



A Roboute Guilliman might never have conquered Terra from the Techno-Barbarians. Or he might have succeeded, and carved out a medium-sized empire just like the Realm of Ultramar but in Segmentum Solar. The Emperor's singular vision and drive to conquer the entire galaxy rapidly is peculiar to the Emperor, for better or worse.

Probably worse. Inter-state competition can do wonders for technological development and drive to outdo the enemy by expansion, as was seen in both Warring States China and early modern Europe. One monolithic Imperium killing its potential future rivals in the cradle also destroyed any alternative paths of human regrowth as galactic power(s), and the cutthroat competition and drive to outdo the others which would likely have ensued.

Unity is not always a strength. Getting saddled with a single state with an inability to invent is a cardinal sin in the long term judgement of interstellar empire: The whole arena hinges on technological and scientific advancement. And so mankind will be fodder for the Great Devourer and the awoken Necrons as it scrambles desperately for scraps of ancient STC to save it, and prays for divine intervention.

This message was edited 13 times. Last update was at 2020/03/10 07:24:05


   
Made in us
Consigned to the Grim Darkness





USA

 Karak Norn Clansman wrote:
Guilliman is meant to embody some of the better aspects of the Romans
... getting shanked at the prime of your career?

The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
 
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka




 Melissia wrote:
 Karak Norn Clansman wrote:
Guilliman is meant to embody some of the better aspects of the Romans
... getting shanked at the prime of your career?

The lesson there is don't duel your horribly mutated brother just call in artillery and if anyone asks say you duelled him.

tremere47-fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate, leads to triple riptide spam  
   
Made in se
Stubborn Hammerer





Sweden

It is appropriate that a character written as a capable ruler, organizer and strategist who is saving the Imperium in its dark hour, is also fed to a traitor Primarch who is superior to him in close combat.

Guilliman is rather much a perfect son, as Angron would have it, and the character needs to be taken down some pegs by highlighting his comparative weaknesses and bolster the kill count of a traitor Primarch in the process. In his prime.

This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2020/03/10 23:43:51


   
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: