Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 05:22:54
Subject: would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Quick apology for the pictures being huge and not tip top quality.
These are the two figures I made as cadre fireblades. I Felt like the actual model looked quite derpy and his face just seems... off.. I also like the idea of possibly running more than one fireblade, so having the same mono-pose model twice just seems off. I figured I'd go go around this by making my own models. I tried to make them distinct from fire warriors whilst still being similar enough. I gave them two shoulder pads because it makes them stand out from a normal fire warrior whilst also making them look more armored up. I tried to give them both some sort of "blade" to make them stand out from standard infantry as well whilst fitting the whole "fire blade" look.
Anyways, the big question is weather or not you'd consider these acceptable in your match as stand ins for the standard GW model.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/09/04 05:42:18
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 05:31:00
Subject: would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced Inquisitorial Acolyte
United States
|
Heck yeah! those dudes look sweet! I'd be proud to fight against them!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 05:32:14
Subject: would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
I'd paint some white stripes on him to make him stand out more but otherwise I don't see why not. I am sure Cadre Fireblades vary in appearance according to the taste of the individual in question like officers in other 40k armies.
|
Thought for the day: Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.
30k Ultramarines: 2000 pts
Bolt Action Germans: ~1200 pts
AOS Stormcast: Just starting.
The Empire : ~60-70 models.
1500 pts
: My Salamanders painting blog 16 Infantry and 2 Vehicles done so far! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 08:40:05
Subject: would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Honestly, I was expecting a much weirder question based on the models.
As it stands, yea, both look pretty much spot on for what you're trying to convey, as long as the rest of your Fire Warriors aren't as over the top.
I mean after all, isn't the Fireblade Cadre just a Fire Warrior who was offered a promotion and declined it because he/she believed they were better suited to be a Fire Warrior than anything else? So yea, it makes sense they'd have the most flare on their gear and be a little over the top as they are long standing veterans. More so, in theory they're still supposed to look like Fire Warriors (which their base model does in a way) so yea, those models work fine as they fill the fluff and most likely can be identified easily in a squad of normal Fire Warriors.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/09/04 08:42:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 09:02:21
Subject: would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Humorless Arbite
|
My stance towards conversions:
Any and all accepted, the more innovative/ creative the better.
My opinion of your fireblades:
Frak yes, they're awesome.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/09/04 09:02:32
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 12:14:12
Subject: Re:would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Hellish Haemonculus
|
Sure, why not?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 12:42:18
Subject: would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
Yeah those definitely stick out from normal firewarriors.
|
Down with Allies, Solo 2016! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 13:52:14
Subject: Re:would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Mutilatin' Mad Dok
|
I see no problem. He isnt massively over/undersized. He looks distinctive (important for an IC). On top of all of that he looks good. 10/10 would smash with Choppa
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 13:55:27
Subject: Re:would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Devastating Dark Reaper
|
Hell no I wouldn't. I'd hate the thought of killing them and making you take them off the table!
But seriously yes of course, I much prefer your versions to the GW version.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 14:03:19
Subject: Re:would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Fiery Bright Wizard
|
I see no reason why not, a fireblade is just a fancy fire warrior, I made made out of Fire warror bits + tank commander bits. Also, way to not help shake the anime fan stereotype buddy!
|
I'll never be able to repay CA for making GW realize that The Old World was a cash cow, left to die in a field. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 16:45:34
Subject: Re:would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Aye man, at least it's not a katana
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 16:47:52
Subject: would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Jovial Plaguebearer of Nurgle
|
I'd have no problem personally
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/04 16:49:07
Subject: would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
Variety is the spice of life. Go for it lol.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 07:20:17
Subject: would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Warning From Magnus? Not Listening!
|
10/10 would devour for the hive mind
|
Necrons - 3000 pts
HH Imperial Militia/Cults - 1000 points Check out my P&M blog! (https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/805464.page)
Bretonnia - 4500 pts
Dakka trades (50): Gav99 (3), FenrisianStuart21 (2), gardeth, norrec65, syypher, Sargow, o Oni o, Rommel44, Lloyld, riverrat88, GloboRojo (2), Cocking_08, mickmoon (2), Acardia, Twoshoesvans, Prandtl, Thedragisal, CptJake, toasteroven, allworkandnoclay, CleverAntics (2), system seven, Siphen, Craftbrews, jmsincla, ellis91, HurricaneGirl, Bionic Reaper, quickfuze, VanHallan, quiestdeus, -iPaint-, Shadowblade07, Dez, Gremore, Ph34r, SwordBird, slyndread (2), JoeBobbyWii, VeternNoob, Madoch1, Dax415, CaptainRexKrammer, francieum, Telmenari, Melevolence |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 10:44:21
Subject: Re:would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
Perfectly reasonable conversions. Whats the issue here? Have opponents refused to play you with them?
|
Dman137 wrote:
goobs is all you guys will ever be
By 1-irt: Still as long as Hissy keeps showing up this is one of the most entertaining threads ever.
"Feelin' goods, good enough". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 10:59:57
Subject: would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Boosting Space Marine Biker
|
I'm not personally a fan of the second conversion but of course i'd play against them, why would anyone ever turn a game down over decent converted models
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 12:31:00
Subject: Re:would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Veteran Knight Baron in a Crusader
|
So long as it's the same size, and everyone knows exactly what it is, it's all good with most of us.
(Nice conversions by the way, I personally don't like the giant GK swords, but it's your model)
|
3000pts Blood Angels (4th Company) - 2000pts Skitarii (Voss Prime) - 2500pts Imperial Knights (Unnamed House) - 1000pts Imperial Guard (Household Retainers)
2000pts Free Peoples (Edlynd Fusiliers) - 2000pts Kharadron Overlords (Barak Zilfin) - 500pts Ironweld Arsenal (Edlynd Ironwork Federation) - 1000pts Duardin (Grongrok Powderheads)
Wargaming's no fun when you have a plan! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 13:15:42
Subject: would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
I'd be fine with it. A crest or something on the helmet feels necessary, but that's being really harsh.
|
They/them
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/05 13:37:52
Subject: would you be willing to play against either of these two conversions?
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
I'm always down for conversions.
|
|
 |
 |
|