Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Got this from a YouTube channel, so grain of salt.

Tank commander down to a BS of 4+, but turret weapons are at +1 BS. Leman Russ can fire main weapon out of melee it's involved in.

Baneblade toughness 9. New tank also toughness 9

Kreig are a playable sub faction.

Sounds plausible, not sure if that's a net loss to tank commanders though.

The YouTube video I saw said the baneblade toughness was unknow but he would guess it was at least 9.

(Also, part of me likes the rumored LRBT change in that maybe it'll make non-TC LRBT more worthwhile)

Glad to see tanks going up in toughness if true. Not enough yet, but better. Hope gw doesn't forget about titans and knights in the process.

Here's the Auspex Tactics video on the rumors. There's some more information there, as well as his personal speculation, and the source in the links below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lamtE9Q1CY

I always wonder what Auspex's name is here. I watch (or really, listen in the background) to most of his vids, and I'm 102% certain he's here somewhere. His talking points line up exactly with what we rant about, just a day later usually. Could he be getting his paoints somewhere else? Possible I suppose, but where? Reddit? (literally the worst place on earth, confirmed). Twitter? Almost as bad, but with less content. His own mind? Maybe, but it would be a hell of a coincidence if his thoughts align precisely with the Dakka hivemind, pretty implausible imo. Reveal yourself, Auspex.

They used to post constantly in 40K general so they do lurk here.

drbored wrote:
Here's the Auspex Tactics video on the rumors. There's some more information there, as well as his personal speculation, and the source in the links below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lamtE9Q1CY

Guy uses fake knight leaks on his video so not putting much stock on those.

tneva82 wrote:

drbored wrote:
Here's the Auspex Tactics video on the rumors. There's some more information there, as well as his personal speculation, and the source in the links below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lamtE9Q1CY

Guy uses fake knight leaks on his video so not putting much stock on those.

Everyone was doing a video about those. Why wouldn't they do a video to talk about the rumour? He even said at the end of the video that they're on the fence about them being real.

Pretty thin basis for a thread.

Khahandran wrote:

tneva82 wrote:

drbored wrote:
Here's the Auspex Tactics video on the rumors. There's some more information there, as well as his personal speculation, and the source in the links below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lamtE9Q1CY

Guy uses fake knight leaks on his video so not putting much stock on those.

Everyone was doing a video about those. Why wouldn't they do a video to talk about the rumour? He even said at the end of the video that they're on the fence about them being real.

Well guy that uses fake knight video's isn't exactly making rumours about IG being credible...If he has proven he has no access to knights why should we believe he has access to IG rules?

"He reported on this thing that was fake that everyone reported on when everyone thought it was real, so why should we believe him?" seems like a really odd litmus test.