Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

JD21290 wrote:krazy, there will allways be moaners mate, as each army gets updated and the rules move forward there will allways be an unbalanced unit / army.

Too true, too true.

krazy, thats why i refuse to take bikernobz, too many people moan and bitch about them, so i rather win without them.
orks did fine before they were a viable option, they arent the be all and end all for orks

im sure there will be more than a few complaints and moans about the IG dex when it comes out

When you start pointing fingers, remember that 4 of them point back at you. Based on your posts on 'Ard Boyz, you're proven and admitted to be a bunch of cheaters, so why should we believe your word?

This is about as far as I made it into your last post. I wont attempt to debate with one that must resort to childish name-calling in order to get their point across. Name calling that is undeserved in the extreme if you REALLY know anything about those you're talking about.

You win, my only retort you might understand would be that you're a poopy pants doody head....but I'll refrain from going on with a post like that.

You may go on with your 'fist shaking' at WC now and continue to make yourself look like an a$$ to those that know better.

Deadshane1 wrote:

Kilkrazy wrote:
However, the judge has been named and shamed, while the player is currently anonymous. I am unclear whether he is the OP or the OP is a friend posting on his behalf.

The way it looks (and I havent caught up on my WC mates on all the dirty little details yet) is that the OP is actually the BROTHER of the player in question.

Then I can see he would complain from a sense of family solidarity.

However, if the Nob player doesn't complain personally, perhaps he is not concerned about the incident, and maybe it would be best to drop it. That might be the best and most mature thing to do. No-one is going to join the French Foreign Legion because of an argument at a 40K competition. People will probably run into each other again at other events, and perpetuating a grudge is just going to lead to more trouble.

Cheating and bad judging are valid topics which can be explored without naming individuals.

Without the judge here to defend himself, it isn't fair to name him. It makes the thread look like an internet witch-hunt. I'm not sure it's a good idea for the WC to be associated with such a project. "Magnanimous in victory, graceful in defeat" may be a more politically astute principle to follow.

Everyone has been quick to jump on the bandwagon without knowledge of the whole circumstances.

Guess that's my bad. I just wanted to tag the tourney rules before they were taken down.

Right, this thread is now starting to generate user alerts so I am locking it to prevent things going any further.

The people posting insults know who they are and they know it's naughty so I'm not wasting my time sending individual PMs.

If anyone wants this thread re-opened in order to continue the discussion in a civilised manner, please PM me or another moderator.