Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Well, this is the uncommon flip side of GW's occasional problems with army book/codex imbalance. It is what it is.

As noted, complaints in-store are less vehement than complaints online. People b*tch more on the internet.

If you choose to deliberately undergun your army, competent opponents will be able to recognize that, and give you credit for it. Taking substantial numbers of Daemonettes is a good way to start. Taking a Daemon Prince is another. Just going mono-slaanesh tends to make a less nasty army (though the LD bomb army does bone certain enemies), as you pass up the Thirster, Flamers, Flesh Hounds, and Khornate Heralds on Juggers, which are some of the best things in the book.

I've played chaos for a long as time as in csm, daemons, warriors, beastmen etc and no offense guys but daemons definately aren't as speacial in 40k.. So really the only way I tend to play them is in fantasy. Though for most tourneys cause of the hating I tend to go with my warriors lol I love chaos and always will and I won't quite playing these armies I have collected for years cause of one codex.