Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Emperors Faithful wrote:

Klawz wrote:

Emperors Faithful wrote:

statu wrote:It's quite clearly stated in the Dark Eldar Codex that Arhra did found the Incubi, as has been shown previously.

Objection!

Going by the exact RAW wording on the fluff Arha is never definitely shown to be the founder of the incubi.

Objection!
It in fact says that he is fabled. I.E. famous.

King Arthur is the fabled warrior of England.

Britain.
Fabled generally means famous for something although that person may or may not exist or have existed.

purplefood wrote:Fabled generally means famous for something although that person may or may not exist or have existed.

Yup. The comment regarding Arha seems to be calling into question whether or not Arha actually existed in the first place. But it also implies that if he did exist, then he's the one who created the Incubi.

And since we know that Arha existed (the Craftworld Codex tells us so in no uncertain terms), it follows that Arha did indeed create the Incubi.

Eumerin wrote:

purplefood wrote:Fabled generally means famous for something although that person may or may not exist or have existed.

Yup. The comment regarding Arha seems to be calling into question whether or not Arha actually existed in the first place. But it also implies that if he did exist, then he's the one who created the Incubi.

And since we know that Arha existed (the Craftworld Codex tells us so in no uncertain terms), it follows that Arha did indeed create the Incubi.

Ok so:
Arha is real.
He created both the Striking Scorpion aspect.
He was defeated by his apprentice who radically changed the Striking Scorpions.
He then buggered off and created the Incubi.
Drazhar may or may not be Arha.
There is a small amount of evidence for both arguments but nothing even slightly conslusive.
Is that all straightened out now?

purplefood wrote:

Eumerin wrote:

purplefood wrote:Fabled generally means famous for something although that person may or may not exist or have existed.

Yup. The comment regarding Arha seems to be calling into question whether or not Arha actually existed in the first place. But it also implies that if he did exist, then he's the one who created the Incubi.

And since we know that Arha existed (the Craftworld Codex tells us so in no uncertain terms), it follows that Arha did indeed create the Incubi.

Ok so:
Arha is real.
He created both the Striking Scorpion aspect.
He was defeated by his apprentice who radically changed the Striking Scorpions.
He then buggered off and created the Incubi.
Drazhar may or may not be Arha.
There is a small amount of evidence for both arguments but nothing even slightly conslusive.
Is that all straightened out now?

Seems to be

purplefood wrote:Ok so:
Arha is real.
He created both the Striking Scorpion aspect.
He was defeated by his apprentice who radically changed the Striking Scorpions.
He then buggered off and created the Incubi.
Drazhar may or may not be Arha.
There is a small amount of evidence for both arguments but nothing even slightly conslusive.
Is that all straightened out now?

Thank Christ. It's over. It's finnally over.

Emperors Faithful wrote:

purplefood wrote:Ok so:
Arha is real.
He created both the Striking Scorpion aspect.
He was defeated by his apprentice who radically changed the Striking Scorpions.
He then buggered off and created the Incubi.
Drazhar may or may not be Arha.
There is a small amount of evidence for both arguments but nothing even slightly conslusive.
Is that all straightened out now?

Thank Christ. It's over. It's finnally over.

So can this thread die now?

It sure as hell was fun arguing though

Brother Hestapheus wrote:It sure as hell was fun arguing though

Please can we just leave this thread.
Let it die...

Bye thread!