Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/28 19:18:51
Subject: Is there a way to make Mandrakes effective?
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
Jancoran wrote:Let me ask its detractors this: what are three good things you CAN do with Mandrakes? Because if you aren't willing to consider the possibilities, you cannot speak to the negative. and vice versa as well.
* You can outflank them
* You can infiltrate them onto an objective and join a hemi to them to some 'pew pew'
* You can use them to shoot/assault weaker 'choppa' units. 10 of them will kill 10 TACs when the mandrakes assault
* You can use them to harass back field units or vehicles with AV10 rear.
* You can use them as cool miniatures in your D&D game
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/28 19:37:55
Subject: Is there a way to make Mandrakes effective?
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
Olympia, WA
|
labmouse42 wrote: Jancoran wrote:Let me ask its detractors this: what are three good things you CAN do with Mandrakes? Because if you aren't willing to consider the possibilities, you cannot speak to the negative. and vice versa as well.
* You can outflank them
* You can infiltrate them onto an objective and join a hemi to them to some 'pew pew'
* You can use them to shoot/assault weaker 'choppa' units. 10 of them will kill 10 TACs when the mandrakes assault
* You can use them to harass back field units or vehicles with AV10 rear.
* You can use them as cool miniatures in your D&D game
That last point was a good onee. Lol. They WOULD be awesome in D&D. And I do run a D&D game every other week...
|
Hold out bait to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and then crush him.
-Sun Tzu, the Art of War
http://www.40kunorthodoxy.blogspot.com
7th Ambassadorial Grand Tournament Registration: http://40kambassadors.com/register.php |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/28 21:43:03
Subject: Is there a way to make Mandrakes effective?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
For the record I have always started my Mandrakes at the edge of my deployment zone, hugging cover when using them. You can deploy your Haemie first and then infiltrate your Mandrakes in cohesion strung out in front of them. Puts you forward with a Haemie without risk if you have cover. Generally there are better targets than stealthed Mandrakes turn one.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 0031/08/29 06:23:05
Subject: Re:Is there a way to make Mandrakes effective?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Darn, I'm just tore-up from the floor-up as far as the rules go. Yer right I confused Wracks T4 with Mandrakes as well. But you know what if they can't even take a Raider then yea any argument I tried to make in their favor is void... but that means. Mandrakes, even with cool models ...are...trash...
At that point you need to pay webway portal and Haemoculus tax, then expose another HQ to drop the portal for like ...maybe.. 6 AP4 wounds? That is ...stunningly bad, like srsly worse than Mutilator bad ZOMG.
For the argument that they are a distraction unit, there's other units that can distract And actually pose a threat for less points (and I'm not even touching allies here). What a shame...
1.) Doesn't know the rules for Mandrakes and has clearly never used them.
2.) Despite this void in applicable knowledge, knows they are "stunningly bad, like srsly worse than Mutilator bad ZOMG"
God I love this place. Automatically Appended Next Post: labmouse42 wrote: Jancoran wrote:Let me ask its detractors this: what are three good things you CAN do with Mandrakes? Because if you aren't willing to consider the possibilities, you cannot speak to the negative. and vice versa as well.
* You can outflank them
* You can infiltrate them onto an objective and join a hemi to them to some 'pew pew'
* You can use them to shoot/assault weaker 'choppa' units. 10 of them will kill 10 TACs when the mandrakes assault
* You can use them to harass back field units or vehicles with AV10 rear.
* You can use them as cool miniatures in your D&D game
 Great post man.
To bad they are finecast or else you could have added paper weight to the list. Stupid drakes can't even hold down a stack of paper efficiently.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/29 06:24:30
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/29 06:27:20
Subject: Re:Is there a way to make Mandrakes effective?
|
 |
Hoary Long Fang with Lascannon
|
I use them as "counts as" Incubi, Pink Horrors....I'm sure there's other uses....
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/29 06:33:47
Subject: Re:Is there a way to make Mandrakes effective?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
As I stated before, I find them quite adequate when maximizing on the rules they have. Choose the deployment option that will most complicate your opponents path to victory, shoot things far, assault things close, GtG if they get heavy fire, and stay in cover. I don't expect them to single handily table opponents, but I do expect them to succeed at the task I stick them on, and they generally do.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/29 06:34:00
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/29 23:10:01
Subject: Re:Is there a way to make Mandrakes effective?
|
 |
Sybarite Swinging an Agonizer
|
ShadarLogoth wrote:Darn, I'm just tore-up from the floor-up as far as the rules go. Yer right I confused Wracks T4 with Mandrakes as well. But you know what if they can't even take a Raider then yea any argument I tried to make in their favor is void... but that means. Mandrakes, even with cool models ...are...trash...
At that point you need to pay webway portal and Haemoculus tax, then expose another HQ to drop the portal for like ...maybe.. 6 AP4 wounds? That is ...stunningly bad, like srsly worse than Mutilator bad ZOMG.
For the argument that they are a distraction unit, there's other units that can distract And actually pose a threat for less points (and I'm not even touching allies here). What a shame...
1.) Doesn't know the rules for Mandrakes and has clearly never used them.
2.) Despite this void in applicable knowledge, knows they are "stunningly bad, like srsly worse than Mutilator bad ZOMG"
God I love this place.
Uh... maybe a silly tone didn't come across...and I made earlier quotes trying to argue in their favor at first, really... ah well I gotta spend some more time reading the codex I guess... or I could fart.... or maybe both... lighten up
Automatically Appended Next Post:
labmouse42 wrote: Jancoran wrote:Let me ask its detractors this: what are three good things you CAN do with Mandrakes? Because if you aren't willing to consider the possibilities, you cannot speak to the negative. and vice versa as well.
* You can outflank them
* You can infiltrate them onto an objective and join a hemi to them to some 'pew pew'
* You can use them to shoot/assault weaker 'choppa' units. 10 of them will kill 10 TACs when the mandrakes assault
* You can use them to harass back field units or vehicles with AV10 rear.
* You can use them as cool miniatures in your D&D game
 Great post man.
To bad they are finecast or else you could have added paper weight to the list. Stupid drakes can't even hold down a stack of paper efficiently.
|
Eldar (Craftworld Sahal-Deran) 2500pts. 2000pts Fully Painted.
Dark Eldar (Kabal of the Slashed Eye) 2000pts. 1250pts Fully Painted. |
|
 |
 |
|