Switch Theme:

Character Targeting  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets





Cardiff

Eh, the new rule says it's additional. Don't the Core Rules still apply too?

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in au
Adolescent Youth with Potential



Queensland, Australia

I love Dakka, everyone arguing and insulting over the fact they all agree that this is a RAW mistake.
   
Made in gb
Waaagh! Ork Warboss





OLDSCL wrote:
I love Dakka, everyone arguing and insulting over the fact they all agree that this is a RAW mistake.
It's not a RaW mistake. It's a "GW may or may not have realised what they have done because they use beagles for rules editors so let's all get angry at people who want to play by the actual rules" mistake.

All this argument has come down to is people noticing the (subjectively) silly consequence of the rule, other people getting mad about it and other people pointing out that getting mad about it has as much effect (and rules backing) as getting mad over the Conscript points change and insisting that 4 actually means 3.

If GW change it, all the better. I personally think it's a bad direction to go in but they are the ones pulling the strings. If they want to change the rules to make Mortarian, Gulliman and other expensive big models harder to kill, thus more powerful, thus sell more, that's their prerogative.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2017/12/08 02:03:16


Disclaimer: My YMDC answers are from a "What the rules, as written (or modified by Special Snowflake FAQ) in the rulebooks, actually say" perspective, not a "What I wish the rules said" perspective. Even GW agrees with me, send an email to 40kfaq@gwplc.com for a confirmation reply "4. Apply The Rules As Written. If you still don’t have a satisfactory answer, use the rule just as it is written if you possibly can, even if you are not completely happy with the effect the rule has."
Because some people get their knickers in a twist, I'll list these RaW 'oddities' in my sig. Sadly GW's promise of fixing their broken rules has itself been broken. Zoom in to read them. RaW you cannot advance and then fire assault weapons, you can't shoot pistols if within 1" of an enemy; "minimum" ranges don't work; Seraphim have to re-roll saves that "fail" pre-re-roll; the game simply breaks if you ever have more than one wounded model in a unit; the game also breaks if a single rule ever tries to do multiple things simultaneously; Khârn punches himself in the face if he's not near some meatshields; Librarians on Bikes are locked to the Index power list, Howling Banshees can't declare a charge further than 12"; Spore Mines have an infinite range; Shroudpsalm technically doesn't do anything, only enemy models, not friendly models, have permission to move on top of a Skyshield Landing Pad; T'au have access to stackable Ignore Wounds (albeit against Mortal Wounds only); the T'au Early Warning Override Support System only works if a unit is "teleporting to the battlefield", not just arriving mid-battle; you can only ever use the Deathwatch Teleportarium Stratagem "once", and then never again in any battle after you use it; if a model splits fire, each weapon must target a different unit; a Tyrant Guard with Lashwhip can absorb an infinite amount of damage via Shieldwall between the time they die and the time they fight; Chapter Tactics on Successor Chapters don't actually do anything; Codex Leman Russ's can take an infinite amount of Hunter-Killer Missiles, Storm Bolters and Heavy Stubbers; Imothekh's 'Lord of the Storm' ability hits the "target unit" twice; "Airborne" units can't be charged by non-FLY units, but can be Heroically Intervened into, piled into, or consolidated into just fine by non-FLY units; Wave Serpents cannot be legally charged at by any model with a standard base; Slab Shields, along with the 'Take Cover!' stratagem no longer have any effect; and vehicles that are "slain" by a special effect do not trigger the "Explodes" ability.
--- Mathhammer tables for 2D6 and 3D6 Charging with various re-roll abilities --- Stylus CSS theme for DakkaDakka forums to hide black avatar background and fully hide ignored users. 
   
Made in us
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran




McCragge

BCB how would-will you play this rule?

Bow down to Guilliman for he is our new God Emperor!

Martel - "Custodes are terrible in 8th. Good luck with them. They take all the problems of marines and multiply them."

"Lol, classic martel. 'I know it was strong enough to podium in the biggest tournament in the world but I refuse to acknowledge space marines are good because I can't win with them and it can't possibly be ME'."

DakkaDakka is really the place where you need anti-tank guns to kill basic dudes, because anything less isn't durable enough. 
   
Made in gb
Waaagh! Ork Warboss





 Primark G wrote:
BCB how would-will you play this rule?
Irrelevant to this discussion, which is the entire point I have been trying to make!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/12/08 02:05:32


Disclaimer: My YMDC answers are from a "What the rules, as written (or modified by Special Snowflake FAQ) in the rulebooks, actually say" perspective, not a "What I wish the rules said" perspective. Even GW agrees with me, send an email to 40kfaq@gwplc.com for a confirmation reply "4. Apply The Rules As Written. If you still don’t have a satisfactory answer, use the rule just as it is written if you possibly can, even if you are not completely happy with the effect the rule has."
Because some people get their knickers in a twist, I'll list these RaW 'oddities' in my sig. Sadly GW's promise of fixing their broken rules has itself been broken. Zoom in to read them. RaW you cannot advance and then fire assault weapons, you can't shoot pistols if within 1" of an enemy; "minimum" ranges don't work; Seraphim have to re-roll saves that "fail" pre-re-roll; the game simply breaks if you ever have more than one wounded model in a unit; the game also breaks if a single rule ever tries to do multiple things simultaneously; Khârn punches himself in the face if he's not near some meatshields; Librarians on Bikes are locked to the Index power list, Howling Banshees can't declare a charge further than 12"; Spore Mines have an infinite range; Shroudpsalm technically doesn't do anything, only enemy models, not friendly models, have permission to move on top of a Skyshield Landing Pad; T'au have access to stackable Ignore Wounds (albeit against Mortal Wounds only); the T'au Early Warning Override Support System only works if a unit is "teleporting to the battlefield", not just arriving mid-battle; you can only ever use the Deathwatch Teleportarium Stratagem "once", and then never again in any battle after you use it; if a model splits fire, each weapon must target a different unit; a Tyrant Guard with Lashwhip can absorb an infinite amount of damage via Shieldwall between the time they die and the time they fight; Chapter Tactics on Successor Chapters don't actually do anything; Codex Leman Russ's can take an infinite amount of Hunter-Killer Missiles, Storm Bolters and Heavy Stubbers; Imothekh's 'Lord of the Storm' ability hits the "target unit" twice; "Airborne" units can't be charged by non-FLY units, but can be Heroically Intervened into, piled into, or consolidated into just fine by non-FLY units; Wave Serpents cannot be legally charged at by any model with a standard base; Slab Shields, along with the 'Take Cover!' stratagem no longer have any effect; and vehicles that are "slain" by a special effect do not trigger the "Explodes" ability.
--- Mathhammer tables for 2D6 and 3D6 Charging with various re-roll abilities --- Stylus CSS theme for DakkaDakka forums to hide black avatar background and fully hide ignored users. 
   
Made in us
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot






Maryland, USA

Nogil wrote:You guys also seem to forget that the new character rule does not specify just shooting phase, overwatch anyone?

Spoiler:


GG GW.


Alright, that image is amazing.

BaconCatBug wrote:It's a "GW may or may not have realised what they have done because they use beagles for rules editors so let's all get angry at people who want to play by the actual rules" mistake.


These rules have clearly been edited by a basset hound.

M.

Codex: Soyuzki - A fluffy guidebook to my Astra Militarum subfaction. Now version 0.6!
Another way would be to simply slide the landraider sideways like a big slowed hovercraft full of eels. -pismakron
Sometimes a little murder is necessary in this hobby. -necrontyrOG

Out-of-the-loop from November 2010 - November 2017 so please excuse my ignorance!
 
   
Made in us
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran




McCragge

BCB it is relevant though... How do you think GW will clarify it?

Bow down to Guilliman for he is our new God Emperor!

Martel - "Custodes are terrible in 8th. Good luck with them. They take all the problems of marines and multiply them."

"Lol, classic martel. 'I know it was strong enough to podium in the biggest tournament in the world but I refuse to acknowledge space marines are good because I can't win with them and it can't possibly be ME'."

DakkaDakka is really the place where you need anti-tank guns to kill basic dudes, because anything less isn't durable enough. 
   
Made in de
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller



Aachen

 Primark G wrote:
BCB it is relevant though... How do you think GW will clarify it?


I expect them to errata it back to how it was before. I can't speak for BCB though.
   
Made in gb
Waaagh! Ork Warboss





 Primark G wrote:
BCB it is relevant though... How do you think GW will clarify it?
I don't know and I don't care, it's not for me to decide or even have an opinion on.

Of course if I were writing the rules I'd actually come up with a character rule that is 8th grade complex instead of 3rd grade and it wouldn't be a total mess. I'd also close all the silly loopholes.

Disclaimer: My YMDC answers are from a "What the rules, as written (or modified by Special Snowflake FAQ) in the rulebooks, actually say" perspective, not a "What I wish the rules said" perspective. Even GW agrees with me, send an email to 40kfaq@gwplc.com for a confirmation reply "4. Apply The Rules As Written. If you still don’t have a satisfactory answer, use the rule just as it is written if you possibly can, even if you are not completely happy with the effect the rule has."
Because some people get their knickers in a twist, I'll list these RaW 'oddities' in my sig. Sadly GW's promise of fixing their broken rules has itself been broken. Zoom in to read them. RaW you cannot advance and then fire assault weapons, you can't shoot pistols if within 1" of an enemy; "minimum" ranges don't work; Seraphim have to re-roll saves that "fail" pre-re-roll; the game simply breaks if you ever have more than one wounded model in a unit; the game also breaks if a single rule ever tries to do multiple things simultaneously; Khârn punches himself in the face if he's not near some meatshields; Librarians on Bikes are locked to the Index power list, Howling Banshees can't declare a charge further than 12"; Spore Mines have an infinite range; Shroudpsalm technically doesn't do anything, only enemy models, not friendly models, have permission to move on top of a Skyshield Landing Pad; T'au have access to stackable Ignore Wounds (albeit against Mortal Wounds only); the T'au Early Warning Override Support System only works if a unit is "teleporting to the battlefield", not just arriving mid-battle; you can only ever use the Deathwatch Teleportarium Stratagem "once", and then never again in any battle after you use it; if a model splits fire, each weapon must target a different unit; a Tyrant Guard with Lashwhip can absorb an infinite amount of damage via Shieldwall between the time they die and the time they fight; Chapter Tactics on Successor Chapters don't actually do anything; Codex Leman Russ's can take an infinite amount of Hunter-Killer Missiles, Storm Bolters and Heavy Stubbers; Imothekh's 'Lord of the Storm' ability hits the "target unit" twice; "Airborne" units can't be charged by non-FLY units, but can be Heroically Intervened into, piled into, or consolidated into just fine by non-FLY units; Wave Serpents cannot be legally charged at by any model with a standard base; Slab Shields, along with the 'Take Cover!' stratagem no longer have any effect; and vehicles that are "slain" by a special effect do not trigger the "Explodes" ability.
--- Mathhammer tables for 2D6 and 3D6 Charging with various re-roll abilities --- Stylus CSS theme for DakkaDakka forums to hide black avatar background and fully hide ignored users. 
   
Made in gb
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets





Cardiff

 BaconCatBug wrote:
OLDSCL wrote:
I love Dakka, everyone arguing and insulting over the fact they all agree that this is a RAW mistake.
It's not a RaW mistake. It's a "GW may or may not have realised what they have done because they use beagles for rules editors so let's all get angry at people who want to play by the actual rules" mistake.

All this argument has come down to is people noticing the (subjectively) silly consequence of the rule, other people getting mad about it and other people pointing out that getting mad about it has as much effect (and rules backing) as getting mad over the Conscript points change and insisting that 4 actually means 3.

If GW change it, all the better. I personally think it's a bad direction to go in but they are the ones pulling the strings. If they want to change the rules to make Mortarian, Gulliman and other expensive big models harder to kill, thus more powerful, thus sell more, that's their prerogative.


I'm not mad. Y U mad bro? Don't ascribe emotion to people calmly discussing just because you're mad about them not agreeing with you.

It's interesting you're discussing intent here... I thought it wasn't relevant?

So HYWPI is that Characters shrink and become protected once their Wounds drop? I mean, my Hive Tyrant would thank you, but it's not what the RAW says and it's very much your house rule. "By that logic..." etc.

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Rough Rider with Boomstick





Texas

I think it is meant to be based off the Starting Wounds Characteristic, not the remaining wounds on the model.

How would you explain this. My Hive Tyrant is W12, he has gaunts in front of him. He gets shot by a Dev Squad with 4 lascannons, they take him down to 9. Now another devastator squad can't shoot him at all, because the gaunts are in the way, even though the hive tyrant hasn't moved at all.

Gotta agree with Bacon Cat Bug for 3 reasons:

1- BACON IS THE BEST
2- CAT MEMES
3 - Bugs = Nids

As Barney Stinson would say... LAWYERED!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/12/08 14:50:28


10000+
8300+
8500+
500
1250+
2000+ IK


DakkaSwap Successful Transactions: cormadepanda, pretre x3, LibertineIX, Lbcwanabe, privateer4hire, Cruentus (swap), Scatwick2 (swap), boneheadracer (swap), quickfuze (swap), Captain Brown (swap) x2

*I'm on Bartertown as Dynas 
   
Made in gb
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets





Cardiff

 Dynas wrote:
I think it is meant to be based off the Starting Wounds Characteristic, not the remaining wounds on the model.

How would you explain this. My Hive Tyrant is W12, he has gaunts in front of him. He gets shot by a Dev Squad with 4 lascannons, they take him down to 9. Now another devastator squad can't shoot him at all, because the gaunts are in the way, even though the hive tyrant hasn't moved at all.

Gotta agree with Bacon Cat Bug for 3 reasons:

1- BACON IS THE BEST
2- CAT MEMES
3 - Bugs = Nids

As Barney Stinson would say... LAWYERED!



Hahaha except he's arguing the opposite...

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight




 Dynas wrote:
I think it is meant to be based off the Starting Wounds Characteristic, not the remaining wounds on the model.

How would you explain this. My Hive Tyrant is W12, he has gaunts in front of him. He gets shot by a Dev Squad with 4 lascannons, they take him down to 9. Now another devastator squad can't shoot him at all, because the gaunts are in the way, even though the hive tyrant hasn't moved at all.

Gotta agree with Bacon Cat Bug for 3 reasons:

1- BACON IS THE BEST
2- CAT MEMES
3 - Bugs = Nids

As Barney Stinson would say... LAWYERED!


I'm not arguing for or against just giving you a "fluff" explanation. How about he "crouches" so he won't be as big of a target? The Hive Tyrant hasn't moved, in terms of horizontal directions, nor have his gaunts but by lowering his profile by hitting the dirt or some such he's become harder to hit.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





Leo_the_Rat wrote:
 Dynas wrote:
I think it is meant to be based off the Starting Wounds Characteristic, not the remaining wounds on the model.

How would you explain this. My Hive Tyrant is W12, he has gaunts in front of him. He gets shot by a Dev Squad with 4 lascannons, they take him down to 9. Now another devastator squad can't shoot him at all, because the gaunts are in the way, even though the hive tyrant hasn't moved at all.

Gotta agree with Bacon Cat Bug for 3 reasons:

1- BACON IS THE BEST
2- CAT MEMES
3 - Bugs = Nids

As Barney Stinson would say... LAWYERED!


I'm not arguing for or against just giving you a "fluff" explanation. How about he "crouches" so he won't be as big of a target? The Hive Tyrant hasn't moved, in terms of horizontal directions, nor have his gaunts but by lowering his profile by hitting the dirt or some such he's become harder to hit.


But he's not becoming harder to hit, he's becoming nigh-unto impossible to hit.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/12/08 15:23:31


 
   
Made in gb
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets





Cardiff

All Orks are crouching SO hard their trousers might split, but you can still shoot them! :-D

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran




McCragge

I think it is okay to tell HYWPI since it helps other posters as a reference.

Bow down to Guilliman for he is our new God Emperor!

Martel - "Custodes are terrible in 8th. Good luck with them. They take all the problems of marines and multiply them."

"Lol, classic martel. 'I know it was strong enough to podium in the biggest tournament in the world but I refuse to acknowledge space marines are good because I can't win with them and it can't possibly be ME'."

DakkaDakka is really the place where you need anti-tank guns to kill basic dudes, because anything less isn't durable enough. 
   
Made in de
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller



Aachen

 Primark G wrote:
I think it is okay to tell HYWPI since it helps other posters as a reference.

Absolutely, as long as you clearly state that it is HYWPI.

RAW says "wounds", which is "current HP" basically. Otherwise, other rules will break as BCB demonstrated. "wound characteristic" is what was asked for before the rule change, and that clearly meant the stat on the datasheet, not the "current HP".

Probably noone will play it like that and GW will probably change it back to "wounds characteristics" in the next FAQ.
   
Made in us
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran




McCragge

"Probably noone will play it like that and GW will probably change it back to "wounds characteristics" in the next FAQ."

Defnitely! :-)

Bow down to Guilliman for he is our new God Emperor!

Martel - "Custodes are terrible in 8th. Good luck with them. They take all the problems of marines and multiply them."

"Lol, classic martel. 'I know it was strong enough to podium in the biggest tournament in the world but I refuse to acknowledge space marines are good because I can't win with them and it can't possibly be ME'."

DakkaDakka is really the place where you need anti-tank guns to kill basic dudes, because anything less isn't durable enough. 
   
Made in us
Secret Inquisitorial Eldar Xenexecutor





I'd hate to say it, but I think we need a mod to lock this thread. We have RAW and RAI interpretations and nothing new has been said in the past three pages - and there's only 4 pages in the thread.

I'm really sorry I brought this up.

Bender wrote:* Realise that despite the way people talk, this is not a professional sport played by demi gods, but rather a game of toy soldiers played by tired, inebriated human beings.


 lolman1c wrote:
The ork train has no breaks mothersquiggor!
 
   
Made in us
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot






Maryland, USA

Wait! I need to collect all these janky rules interpretations so I can be a counter-TFG to whatever obnoxious boi I get stuck playing!



M.

Codex: Soyuzki - A fluffy guidebook to my Astra Militarum subfaction. Now version 0.6!
Another way would be to simply slide the landraider sideways like a big slowed hovercraft full of eels. -pismakron
Sometimes a little murder is necessary in this hobby. -necrontyrOG

Out-of-the-loop from November 2010 - November 2017 so please excuse my ignorance!
 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran




edited by moderator

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/12/08 19:44:46


 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





Ruin wrote:
 JohnnyHell wrote:
 BaconCatBug wrote:
OLDSCL wrote:
I love Dakka, everyone arguing and insulting over the fact they all agree that this is a RAW mistake.
It's not a RaW mistake. It's a "GW may or may not have realised what they have done because they use beagles for rules editors so let's all get angry at people who want to play by the actual rules" mistake.

All this argument has come down to is people noticing the (subjectively) silly consequence of the rule, other people getting mad about it and other people pointing out that getting mad about it has as much effect (and rules backing) as getting mad over the Conscript points change and insisting that 4 actually means 3.

If GW change it, all the better. I personally think it's a bad direction to go in but they are the ones pulling the strings. If they want to change the rules to make Mortarian, Gulliman and other expensive big models harder to kill, thus more powerful, thus sell more, that's their prerogative.


I'm not mad. Y U mad bro? Don't ascribe emotion to people calmly discussing just because you're mad about them not agreeing with you.

It's interesting you're discussing intent here... I thought it wasn't relevant?

So HYWPI is that Characters shrink and become protected once their Wounds drop? I mean, my Hive Tyrant would thank you, but it's not what the RAW says and it's very much your house rule. "By that logic..." etc.


Speak for yourself mate, you're the one that being an abrasive arse ITT (and many others).



He was speaking for himself. Are you popping in for any reason other than to insult him and break forum rules while doing do?


RAW can be read two ways - it can still be read the way it was, or read the way BCB is reading it. Given the German version still having it based on the Wounds characteristic, that would suggest that the interpretation that it still applies to the wound characteristic is what is still intended.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/12/08 19:47:16


 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran




 doctortom wrote:
Ruin wrote:
 JohnnyHell wrote:
 BaconCatBug wrote:
OLDSCL wrote:
I love Dakka, everyone arguing and insulting over the fact they all agree that this is a RAW mistake.
It's not a RaW mistake. It's a "GW may or may not have realised what they have done because they use beagles for rules editors so let's all get angry at people who want to play by the actual rules" mistake.

All this argument has come down to is people noticing the (subjectively) silly consequence of the rule, other people getting mad about it and other people pointing out that getting mad about it has as much effect (and rules backing) as getting mad over the Conscript points change and insisting that 4 actually means 3.

If GW change it, all the better. I personally think it's a bad direction to go in but they are the ones pulling the strings. If they want to change the rules to make Mortarian, Gulliman and other expensive big models harder to kill, thus more powerful, thus sell more, that's their prerogative.


I'm not mad. Y U mad bro? Don't ascribe emotion to people calmly discussing just because you're mad about them not agreeing with you.

It's interesting you're discussing intent here... I thought it wasn't relevant?

So HYWPI is that Characters shrink and become protected once their Wounds drop? I mean, my Hive Tyrant would thank you, but it's not what the RAW says and it's very much your house rule. "By that logic..." etc.


Speak for yourself mate, you're the one that being an abrasive arse ITT (and many others).



He was speaking for himself. Are you popping in for any reason other than to insult him and break forum rules while doing do?


RAW can be read two ways - it can still be read the way it was, or read the way BCB is reading it. Given the German version still having it based on the Wounds characteristic, that would suggest that the interpretation that it still applies to the wound characteristic is what is still intended.


Given that GW have historically defaulted to the English version being correct in multiple language issues then we're probably back to square one with this.
   
Made in us
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran




McCragge

I think anyone playing it now that a character that starts off with 10 or more wounds can't be targeted when its wounds drop below 10 will be in for a rude surprise when it is officially clarified.

Bow down to Guilliman for he is our new God Emperor!

Martel - "Custodes are terrible in 8th. Good luck with them. They take all the problems of marines and multiply them."

"Lol, classic martel. 'I know it was strong enough to podium in the biggest tournament in the world but I refuse to acknowledge space marines are good because I can't win with them and it can't possibly be ME'."

DakkaDakka is really the place where you need anti-tank guns to kill basic dudes, because anything less isn't durable enough. 
   
Made in us
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran






I have a modicum of hope that GW will reverse course entirely and just go back to the original rule.

It doesn't matter whether you interpret the new rule as wounds remaining or wounds characteristic, the new CA rule is complete and utter bs.

I think we all just need to ignore its existence.
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





 Primark G wrote:
I think anyone playing it now that a character that starts off with 10 or more wounds can't be targeted when its wounds drop below 10 will be in for a rude surprise when it is officially clarified.

Few are going to care one way or the other if this eventually gets changed. Don't pair emotional attachment to rules interpretations.

While some people in this thread are trying to incite others, most people just care what the rule actually says.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in gb
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets





Cardiff

 Primark G wrote:
I think anyone playing it now that a character that starts off with 10 or more wounds can't be targeted when its wounds drop below 10 will be in for a rude surprise when it is officially clarified.


Indeed. Roll on that 2-week FAQ...

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran




McCragge

Good old GW...


Bow down to Guilliman for he is our new God Emperor!

Martel - "Custodes are terrible in 8th. Good luck with them. They take all the problems of marines and multiply them."

"Lol, classic martel. 'I know it was strong enough to podium in the biggest tournament in the world but I refuse to acknowledge space marines are good because I can't win with them and it can't possibly be ME'."

DakkaDakka is really the place where you need anti-tank guns to kill basic dudes, because anything less isn't durable enough. 
   
Made in nl
Been Around the Block




Just to be sure, the rule that you can't shoot a character if there is a closer unit, but it is in melee is still valid right?
   
Made in de
Blood-Drenched Death Company Marine





Germany

Malachon wrote:
Just to be sure, the rule that you can't shoot a character if there is a closer unit, but it is in melee is still valid right?


Yes. Also if the unit is closer and not visible to the firer.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/12/31 13:25:19


 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: