Switch Theme:

Shas and Drones and Challenges  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Los Angeles

A Shas and his two frisbees gets caught by some muhreens. "Your ethereals suck, Elly! Just another Socialist plot! Wanna do something about it?"

The Shas'el pushes his drones forward ...

Okay, I can't continue with the silly example, but the Q is:

Given the Codex's nature of Shield Drones able to be fobbed off for wounds, how could a Challenge work out?

Choices:

a. SDs don't fit 'the rest of the unit' and so the Shas can't decline because he and the drones count as a unit, a wacky one of a Crisis Suit and two ablative wounds, that count as models, but already have a built in Look Out, Sir! feature. It can get weird.
b. Shas'el declines the Challenge and the SDs fight instead.
c. Other?
and
D. He accepts the Challenge and can still fob off wounds on the SDs because that's how they work.

Discuss.

"You can bring any cheesy unit you want. If you lose. Casey taught me that." -Tim S.

"I'm gonna follow Casey; he knows where the beer's at!" -Blackmoor, BAO 2013

Quitting Daemon Princes, Bob and Fred - a 40k webcomic 
   
Made in us
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Los Angeles, CA

Brothererekose wrote:A Shas and his two frisbees gets caught by some muhreens. "Your ethereals suck, Elly! Just another Socialist plot! Wanna do something about it?"

The Shas'el pushes his drones forward ...

Okay, I can't continue with the silly example, but the Q is:

Given the Codex's nature of Shield Drones able to be fobbed off for wounds, how could a Challenge work out?

Choices:

a. SDs don't fit 'the rest of the unit' and so the Shas can't decline because he and the drones count as a unit, a wacky one of a Crisis Suit and two ablative wounds, that count as models, but already have a built in Look Out, Sir! feature. It can get weird.
b. Shas'el declines the Challenge and the SDs fight instead.
c. Other?
and
D. He accepts the Challenge and can still fob off wounds on the SDs because that's how they work.

Discuss.


There was quite a long discussion about this already, just replacing Fenrisian wolves for drones. Some players seem to conclude that just because a model is added to a unit that is taken as wargear this somehow means they aren't actual models, despite what the rules actually say.


Drones are models. They do not even have any special rules to 'fob off wounds' anymore...you might be thinking of the 3rd edition codex?

The only things Shield Drones have now is the Toughness, armor save and unit type of their owner...but beyond that they are treated as any other member of a unit (except that they do get removed when their owner is killed).

But they do have their own profile of characteristics which per the basic game rules means they are a separate model. This means they are totally unable to participate in a challenge that their character is involved in, just like any other member of the unit.




I play (click on icons to see pics): DQ:70+S++G(FAQ)M++B-I++Pw40k92/f-D+++A+++/areWD104R+T(D)DM+++
yakface's 40K rule #1: Although the rules allow you to use modeling to your advantage, how badly do you need to win your toy soldier games?
yakface's 40K rule #2: Friends don't let friends start a MEQ army.
yakface's 40K rule #3: Codex does not ALWAYS trump the rulebook, so please don't say that!
Waaagh Dakka: click the banner to learn more! 
   
Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

Don't drones take on the unit type of their masters?
So a fire warrior squad's sheild drone is infantry while crisis suits are jet?
Wouldn't that make a characters drones characters too?

It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
Made in us
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Los Angeles, CA

liturgies of blood wrote:Don't drones take on the unit type of their masters?
So a fire warrior squad's sheild drone is infantry while crisis suits are jet?
Wouldn't that make a characters drones characters too?


That is correct, and perhaps I should have specified that.

So you can choose to accept a challenge with a shield drone (currently), as they are considered characters like their owners. But if the drone controller does actually accept the challenge then at that point the Drones can no longer help out (except to try the heroic intervention thing in the next round of combat).


I play (click on icons to see pics): DQ:70+S++G(FAQ)M++B-I++Pw40k92/f-D+++A+++/areWD104R+T(D)DM+++
yakface's 40K rule #1: Although the rules allow you to use modeling to your advantage, how badly do you need to win your toy soldier games?
yakface's 40K rule #2: Friends don't let friends start a MEQ army.
yakface's 40K rule #3: Codex does not ALWAYS trump the rulebook, so please don't say that!
Waaagh Dakka: click the banner to learn more! 
   
Made in au
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus






liturgies of blood wrote:Don't drones take on the unit type of their masters?
So a fire warrior squad's sheild drone is infantry while crisis suits are jet?
Wouldn't that make a characters drones characters too?


This is a significant problem, I can't recall where but there is certainly precedent that "character" is part of the unit type of a model, and thus when drones inherit their unit type from a character they would become characters themselves.

Other than that weird situation though Yakface is right, the drones can play no role in the challenge of the model which has their drone controller and vice versa, the only way to get a drone involved in a challenge is if you accept that they inherit the "character" unit type, and accept the challenge with the drone instead.

Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).


-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers 
   
Made in us
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Los Angeles, CA


Actually, looking more closely at the rules for unit types (page 44 of the rulebook) reveals that 'character' is not a unit type at all, but just something that a model may be noted as having.

As such, I don't actually think Shield Drones count as being characters. Because for example, when an ability specifies that you pick a certain unit type to affect, you'd be picking one of the actual unit types listed in the rules (Infantry, Bikes & Jetbikes, Artillery, Jump (+ whatever other unit type), Jet Pack (+ whatever other unit type), monstrous creatures, beasts, cavalry and Flying Monstrous Creatures. An Infantry (character) wouldn't be considered a different unit type than an Infantry model, so in that light a Drone wouldn't inherit the 'character' designation from its owner.




I play (click on icons to see pics): DQ:70+S++G(FAQ)M++B-I++Pw40k92/f-D+++A+++/areWD104R+T(D)DM+++
yakface's 40K rule #1: Although the rules allow you to use modeling to your advantage, how badly do you need to win your toy soldier games?
yakface's 40K rule #2: Friends don't let friends start a MEQ army.
yakface's 40K rule #3: Codex does not ALWAYS trump the rulebook, so please don't say that!
Waaagh Dakka: click the banner to learn more! 
   
Made in us
Infiltrating Oniwaban





Fayetteville

I can see that reasoning. But the Tau FAQ says:

"Pg32 Commander, Unit Type.
Change Unit Type to Infantry (Jet Pack, Character)." [whereas the reference section in the BRB says "In (Ch), Jp"]

Codex, Page 31. Shield Drone. : "Unit Type: as owner."

So once again we're faced with GW being loose with the language. The BRB indicates that the character designation is something in addition to unit type, but the codex shows that it's a part of it. I can see the argument both ways even with regards to fluff. I don't think a shield drone is really a character like a shas'ui or sergeant, but it makes sense that it would intervene or be directed to intervene on the commander's behalf.





The Imperial Navy, A Galatic Force for Good. 
   
Made in us
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre





Richmond, VA

It isn't so much needing the character to be a unit type, rather that the drones become the unit type of their owner. Seeing as it doesn't say otherwise, we need to figure out if being a character is a unit type, also the same for independent characters.

One issue is in the back of the rulebook, under type, is where anything being a character is listed.

Furthermore on page 410, at the top under types it lists characters...

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/08/19 22:12:31


Desert Hunters of Vior'la The Purge Iron Hands Adepts of Pestilence Tallaran Desert Raiders Grey Knight Teleport Assault Force
Lt. Coldfire wrote:Seems to me that you should be refereeing and handing out red cards--like a boss.

 Peregrine wrote:
SCREEE I'M A SEAGULL SCREE SCREEEE!!!!!
 
   
Made in us
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Los Angeles, CA

 juraigamer wrote:
It isn't so much needing the character to be a unit type, rather that the drones become the unit type of their owner. Seeing as it doesn't say otherwise, we need to figure out if being a character is a unit type, also the same for independent characters.

One issue is in the back of the rulebook, under type, is where anything being a character is listed.

Furthermore on page 410, at the top under types it lists characters...



Agreed, but that is just the summary page. The actual rules text for unit types on page 44 is much more explicit. character designation is something IN ADDITION to its unit type.


I play (click on icons to see pics): DQ:70+S++G(FAQ)M++B-I++Pw40k92/f-D+++A+++/areWD104R+T(D)DM+++
yakface's 40K rule #1: Although the rules allow you to use modeling to your advantage, how badly do you need to win your toy soldier games?
yakface's 40K rule #2: Friends don't let friends start a MEQ army.
yakface's 40K rule #3: Codex does not ALWAYS trump the rulebook, so please don't say that!
Waaagh Dakka: click the banner to learn more! 
   
Made in us
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre





Richmond, VA

Yes I'm well aware, it's just not 100% clear if being a character is a "Type" as some pages say yes, and others say no.

Desert Hunters of Vior'la The Purge Iron Hands Adepts of Pestilence Tallaran Desert Raiders Grey Knight Teleport Assault Force
Lt. Coldfire wrote:Seems to me that you should be refereeing and handing out red cards--like a boss.

 Peregrine wrote:
SCREEE I'M A SEAGULL SCREE SCREEEE!!!!!
 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran




Anacortes

They are his shields he can use them since he is the only one who can use them, and they disapeer if he dies. They can't accept a challenge for him. But its mute just make a body guard fight for him insted with his shield drones. The drones are part of the boss's wargears benefitting him.

Lordy Lordy Lordy

In a dog eat dog be a cat. 
   
Made in us
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre





Richmond, VA

Lungpickle wrote:
They are his shields he can use them since he is the only one who can use them, and they disapeer if he dies. They can't accept a challenge for him. But its mute just make a body guard fight for him insted with his shield drones. The drones are part of the boss's wargears benefitting him.

Lordy Lordy Lordy


Personal opinions aren't rules...

Have you read the rule we are talking about?

Desert Hunters of Vior'la The Purge Iron Hands Adepts of Pestilence Tallaran Desert Raiders Grey Knight Teleport Assault Force
Lt. Coldfire wrote:Seems to me that you should be refereeing and handing out red cards--like a boss.

 Peregrine wrote:
SCREEE I'M A SEAGULL SCREE SCREEEE!!!!!
 
   
Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

Lungpickle wrote:
They are his shields he can use them since he is the only one who can use them, and they disapeer if he dies. They can't accept a challenge for him. But its mute just make a body guard fight for him insted with his shield drones. The drones are part of the boss's wargears benefitting him.

Lordy Lordy Lordy

I don't think he can use them unless they are the closest model to the firing unit. If he is the only model in the open or the closest why other than a LOS roll would it not be him that bites the bullet.

It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: