Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Frazzled wrote:

 htj wrote:

Frazzled wrote:Again, you're just bloowing smoke out your ass. Without proof I can as easily say that the atheists did it themselves.

That'd be convenient for the demonisation of the atheists, wouldn't it? Something bad is done, and it was probably done by disgruntled people who would call themselves Christians, but without proof we should ignore it entirely and only focus on the group that you don't like doing things you don't like. After all, maybe they did it too? Massive cop-out.

Horse gak. Again you're assuming facts not in evidence. Call me when you have proof of...anything.

Of course I'm inferring from the situation without evidence. It's the most likely situation. You can huff all you want about 'no proof, not worth considering' but in the end you're just going to come across as being unwilling to admit any wrong-doing could have taken part on the part of the Christian populace. That, I'm afraid, is horse gak.

 htj wrote:

 Frazzled wrote:

 htj wrote:

Frazzled wrote:Again, you're just bloowing smoke out your ass. Without proof I can as easily say that the atheists did it themselves.

That'd be convenient for the demonisation of the atheists, wouldn't it? Something bad is done, and it was probably done by disgruntled people who would call themselves Christians, but without proof we should ignore it entirely and only focus on the group that you don't like doing things you don't like. After all, maybe they did it too? Massive cop-out.

Horse gak. Again you're assuming facts not in evidence. Call me when you have proof of...anything.

Of course I'm inferring from the situation without evidence. It's the most likely situation. You can huff all you want about 'no proof, not worth considering' but in the end you're just going to come across as being unwilling to admit any wrong-doing could have taken part on the part of the Christian populace. That, I'm afraid, is horse gak.

No its not. Santa Monica is a diverse population. IN actuality its most liekly teenagers of your age group, just being dicks. Where were you at the time of the incident?

 Frazzled wrote:

 htj wrote:

 Frazzled wrote:

 htj wrote:

Frazzled wrote:Again, you're just bloowing smoke out your ass. Without proof I can as easily say that the atheists did it themselves.

That'd be convenient for the demonisation of the atheists, wouldn't it? Something bad is done, and it was probably done by disgruntled people who would call themselves Christians, but without proof we should ignore it entirely and only focus on the group that you don't like doing things you don't like. After all, maybe they did it too? Massive cop-out.

Horse gak. Again you're assuming facts not in evidence. Call me when you have proof of...anything.

Of course I'm inferring from the situation without evidence. It's the most likely situation. You can huff all you want about 'no proof, not worth considering' but in the end you're just going to come across as being unwilling to admit any wrong-doing could have taken part on the part of the Christian populace. That, I'm afraid, is horse gak.

No its not. Santa Monica is a diverse population. IN actuality its most liekly teenagers of your age group, just being dicks. Where were you at the time of the incident?

Haha, calling people of my age group teenagers would be a fairly major mathematical error. And resorting to stupid insults like that isn't going to convince me. But hey, if you're stuck on the issue then I'm not going to convince you. Just going to have to disagree with you on that one.

Which, given the facts we have available seems a good place to leave this then.