Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/08 07:28:40
Subject: Iyanden Codex.....
|
 |
Araqiel
London, UK
|
Downloaded my Iyanden codex eagerly awaiting some thing cool and was sadly disappointed.
The extra fluff and background material is nice, but, a page of rules and some alternative "Awesome Artifacts of Annihilation" (which seem a bit "Meh") for 40k, sections for Planet Strike and City Fight (does anyone actually play those rules anymore?) and 6 (I think) Iyanden specific missions........
The concept of a supplemental codex with special rules was amazing, sadly, this just does tick the boxes.
Heres hoping Anyone/Someone disagrees with me and has spotted something shiny and awesome I've missed?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/08 13:50:35
Subject: Iyanden Codex.....
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
ghpoobah wrote:Downloaded my Iyanden codex eagerly awaiting some thing cool and was sadly disappointed.
The extra fluff and background material is nice, but, a page of rules and some alternative "Awesome Artifacts of Annihilation" (which seem a bit "Meh") for 40k, sections for Planet Strike and City Fight (does anyone actually play those rules anymore?) and 6 (I think) Iyanden specific missions........
The concept of a supplemental codex with special rules was amazing, sadly, this just does tick the boxes.
Heres hoping Anyone/Someone disagrees with me and has spotted something shiny and awesome I've missed?
A page of rules is still better then nothing compared to what they've given for "Chapter/legion/clan" lists. Also the rules for Iyanden is pretty cool.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/08 13:52:38
Subject: Iyanden Codex.....
|
 |
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan
|
Old chaos codex only used to have a single page for each faction, and that had everything on it, including rules and fluff.
So its enough space to make a change in the army.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/08 14:19:47
Subject: Iyanden Codex.....
|
 |
Ian Pickstock
Nottingham
|
Could someone give a more detailed breakdown of it? I know there are many people on here who'd be interested in how the supplemental codexes turn out.
|
Naaa na na na-na-na-naaa.
Na-na-na-naaaaa.
Hey Jude. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/08 14:53:39
Subject: Re:Iyanden Codex.....
|
 |
Sneaky Striking Scorpion
Oregon
|
Its pretty much what I wanted in the main codex:
The ability to take many spiritseers in an army, the ability to use ranged wraithguard in an effective manner, the ability to take Iyanna
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/08 14:56:33
Subject: Iyanden Codex.....
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
BryllCream wrote:Could someone give a more detailed breakdown of it? I know there are many people on here who'd be interested in how the supplemental codexes turn out.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/532137.page
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/08 21:33:10
Subject: Iyanden Codex.....
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Jackal wrote:Old chaos codex only used to have a single page for each faction, and that had everything on it, including rules and fluff.
So its enough space to make a change in the army.
Not sure why GW is after Iyanden. They make the players think that this is an army worth playing. But at the competitive level I'd be cautious. Why not a book about craftworlds and one page of rules for each of the popular craftworlds?
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/08 22:59:04
Subject: Iyanden Codex.....
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
wuestenfux wrote: Jackal wrote:Old chaos codex only used to have a single page for each faction, and that had everything on it, including rules and fluff.
So its enough space to make a change in the army.
Not sure why GW is after Iyanden. They make the players think that this is an army worth playing. But at the competitive level I'd be cautious. Why not a book about craftworlds and one page of rules for each of the popular craftworlds?
To help sell the new Wraith models I guess?
I think the idea of supplements has a lot of potential, but the price for what you get - particularly compared to the old Craftworlds or Eye of Terror rulebooks, and even the CSM Legion rules - seems really disappointing.
|
Enlist as a virtual Ultramarine! Click here for my Chaos Gate (PC) thread.
"It is the great irony of the Legiones Astartes: engineered to kill to achieve a victory of peace that they can then be no part of."
- Roboute Guilliman
"As I recall, your face was tortured. Imagine that - the Master of the Wolves, his ferocity twisted into grief. And yet you still carried out your duty. You always did what was asked of you. So loyal. So tenacious. Truly you were the attack dog of the Emperor. You took no pleasure in what you did. I knew that then, and I know it now. But all things change, my brother. I'm not the same as I was, and you're... well, let us not mention where you are now."
- Magnus the Red, to a statue of Leman Russ
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/08 23:39:23
Subject: Iyanden Codex.....
|
 |
Stubborn Prosecutor
|
wuestenfux wrote:Not sure why GW is after Iyanden. They make the players think that this is an army worth playing. But at the competitive level I'd be cautious. Why not a book about craftworlds and one page of rules for each of the popular craftworlds?
Because they can make a lot more money by selling 4-5 different supplements than they can with only 1.
|
It's time to go full Skeletor |
|
 |
 |
|