| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 17:40:00
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Crushing Black Templar Crusader Pilot
|
Since when does GW have a FB page?
|
BLACK TEMPLARS - 2000 0RkZ - 2000 NIDZ - WIP STEEL LEGION - WIP
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 17:42:31
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Let's just say that I would not be surprised.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 17:48:54
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Angry Blood Angel Assault marine
|
Digital has had a page for a few months.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 17:51:52
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Crushing Black Templar Crusader Pilot
|
Whats it called? Games Workshop Digital?
|
BLACK TEMPLARS - 2000 0RkZ - 2000 NIDZ - WIP STEEL LEGION - WIP
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 17:52:25
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Lynata wrote:It's just some very few chronically Negative Nancies that see bad things everywhere, or the occasional troll who stumbles into a thread and yells " lol squatted".
Right, and that's what I meant with "sometimes".
Lynata wrote:There is such a thing as being too optimistic, though. And that's a dangerous road. Moderation is key to calmness.
Maybe, but there's nothing wrong with taking a different viewpoint. I'm of the opinion that there is a good base of evidence indicating that thing'll come good for us, just a matter of waiting a bit longer.
|
Order of the Righteous Armour - 542 points so far. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 17:53:37
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Moustache-twirling Princeps
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 18:12:28
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
They never confirmed this century either Petre.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 18:12:50
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
beast_gts wrote:From their Facebook page: "We haven't announced the release dates for these yet, but I can say that Sisters of Battle and Sentinels of Terra will be released in October, and Blood Angels will be in November" (which isn't much help...)
Best_gts, where did you find this ? I went through all the recent post and all their comments on your link and I couldn't find it. Yes, I'm as hysterical as I sound  . Automatically Appended Next Post: Don't worry guys, it's 2013. Oh, wait, using the Arab/Persian calendar  !
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/01 18:13:53
"Our fantasy settings are grim and dark, but that is not a reflection of who we are or how we feel the real world should be. [...] We will continue to diversify the cast of characters we portray [...] so everyone can find representation and heroes they can relate to. [...] If [you don't feel the same way], you will not be missed"
https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1268665798467432449/photo/1 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 18:58:56
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Hellacious Havoc
United States
|
Shandara wrote:Kinda strange they would update it so 'people can begin a collection' when there's essential models like Seraphim Superiors still missing from the webstore.
I'd talk to the nids first before complaining about models not existing. Half their codex that is rumored to be redone is still missing models.
|
Chaos. Good News |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 21:09:16
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Moustache-twirling Princeps
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 21:11:07
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
Thanks a lot !
|
"Our fantasy settings are grim and dark, but that is not a reflection of who we are or how we feel the real world should be. [...] We will continue to diversify the cast of characters we portray [...] so everyone can find representation and heroes they can relate to. [...] If [you don't feel the same way], you will not be missed"
https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1268665798467432449/photo/1 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 21:30:26
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
PaperworkNinja wrote:Sisters of Battle Player: "The Sisters all look kind of small... underaged... and frilly." GWADTR: "Yes! We've gone with CLAMP as our new art direction team for Sisters of Battle. Instead of Servo-Skulls and Cherubim, we're getting cute stuffed animal familiars instead!""
Hehe. Trading one fetish for another, huh? Not sure if that'd be worse or just equally crap as Blanche forcing his weird fetishes on any woman he draws His art is the worst art of any of the official 40k artists. No exceptions-- no artist that GW employs is a worse artist than he. I've seen plenty of freaking fanart that's better than his art in every single way. I hesitate to even call what he draws art.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/10/01 21:31:04
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 21:41:01
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Thanks for bringing that back up. We'd managed to move past it...
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 21:42:44
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Not my fault that the thread had been so busy since I last posted
Regardless, I suppose we'll see if GW lives up to the hype this month, for however little the hype is worth. At least it means new players will be able to actually find an official copy of the codex without scavenging through ebay.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 21:55:55
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Looks like existing material. Not new codexes for 6th ed.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 22:09:39
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Yeah, you missed the information that was from Gamesday UK then. Cruddace said that they looked into making the Faith System scale with the army, and that there were minor point tweaks.
We can probably count on relics too since those are a staple of 6th.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 22:13:20
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Even the original description says that it's more than just a reprint. Apart from the addition of warlord traits, it says that rules, background and photography have been updated.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/01 22:19:11
Order of the Righteous Armour - 542 points so far. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 22:23:37
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
Melissia wrote:His art is the worst art of any of the official 40k artists. No exceptions-- no artist that GW employs is a worse artist than he. I've seen plenty of freaking fanart that's better than his art in every single way. I hesitate to even call what he draws art.
Well, it's not my fault if you have bad taste in art. You probably think Bosch and Grünewald were crap as well. But carry on.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/01 22:46:14
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
Ireland
|
I like Blanche's art. Perhaps one simply shouldn't take everything he drew as serious and accurate, but rather an idea, a warped reflection of 40k's theme and soul.
Just like some of the written stuff.
[edit] People do need to stop posting that 2E Codex cover, though. If only because so many fans fail to understand the above.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/01 22:48:21
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/02 01:21:33
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
Troike wrote:
Exalted. I think that the pessimism surrounding the SoB really can get unreasonable sometimes, it's good to realise that things don't always point towards the worst outcome, there's plenty of evidence that we'll get a good outcome.
pretre if you could remind us exactly how long it's been since the first rumors of plastic Sisters again? Have we hit two decades yet?
|
I beg of you sarge let me lead the charge when the battle lines are drawn
Lemme at least leave a good hoof beat they'll remember loud and long
SoB, IG, SM, SW, Nec, Cus, Tau, FoW Germans, Team Yankee Marines, Battletech Clan Wolf, Mercs
DR:90-SG+M+B+I+Pw40k12+ID+++A+++/are/WD-R+++T(S)DM+ |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/02 01:36:44
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Storm Trooper with Maglight
|
Anybody know why you can't preorder it?
|
"We have all and none. Death better come to the other bastard first." - SSG Alton, 19th Valerian Light Infantry Regiment
"With iron and fire the beast shall be lain low at the hands of the Hunters whose home is under the Bloodmoon." - Bloodmoon Hunters Chapter
"Bring on the Angels of Blood and Darkness as thy descend from the heavens to smite our enemies. Let the Wolves of war rend and tear our foes to pieces. And we of the Bloodmoon Hunters shall bring the iron and fire as our vehicles crush all that oppose us under our treads." - Tech-Captain of the Bloodmoon Hunters
My 40k Armies:
Bloodmoon Hunters (Iron Hands Successors)
Lunar Venatorii Regiments (Astra Miltarium)
Mjior Prime Expediton (Skitarii/Admech)
Ordo Machinum (Inquisition) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/02 01:52:22
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Because only full releases (like the Dark Elves) are the things that get preorders.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/02 02:13:16
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
Rather, imho, because it makes no sense to preorder some digital release. The whole point of preordering is being sure not to wait if your local reseller become out of stock. Digital release never go out of stock. I may be wrong, but I don't think GW ever proposed preorder for digital releases.
|
"Our fantasy settings are grim and dark, but that is not a reflection of who we are or how we feel the real world should be. [...] We will continue to diversify the cast of characters we portray [...] so everyone can find representation and heroes they can relate to. [...] If [you don't feel the same way], you will not be missed"
https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1268665798467432449/photo/1 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/02 02:19:37
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
KalashnikovMarine wrote: Troike wrote:
Exalted. I think that the pessimism surrounding the SoB really can get unreasonable sometimes, it's good to realise that things don't always point towards the worst outcome, there's plenty of evidence that we'll get a good outcome.
pretre if you could remind us exactly how long it's been since the first rumors of plastic Sisters again? Have we hit two decades yet?
at least 12 years.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/02 03:27:11
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
Arigato. So we're rolling right along here. At some point it's alright to develop a dark, sarcastic, bitter sense of humor with your fellow tovarich in the gulag of GW's spite.
|
I beg of you sarge let me lead the charge when the battle lines are drawn
Lemme at least leave a good hoof beat they'll remember loud and long
SoB, IG, SM, SW, Nec, Cus, Tau, FoW Germans, Team Yankee Marines, Battletech Clan Wolf, Mercs
DR:90-SG+M+B+I+Pw40k12+ID+++A+++/are/WD-R+++T(S)DM+ |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/02 06:27:23
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
KalashnikovMarine wrote: Troike wrote:
Exalted. I think that the pessimism surrounding the SoB really can get unreasonable sometimes, it's good to realise that things don't always point towards the worst outcome, there's plenty of evidence that we'll get a good outcome.
pretre if you could remind us exactly how long it's been since the first rumors of plastic Sisters again? Have we hit two decades yet?
And if I could remind you that I already adressed that by pointing out that the developers have consistently said that they've had modelling issues, until just recently?
|
Order of the Righteous Armour - 542 points so far. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/02 06:43:21
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Cosmic Joe
|
OK, all I have is an I Phone, what do I need to download the new codex? Break it down for me, cause I clueless when it comes to technology.
|
Also, check out my history blog: Minimum Wage Historian, a fun place to check out history that often falls between the couch cushions. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/02 06:52:59
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
MWHistorian wrote:OK, all I have is an I Phone, what do I need to download the new codex? Break it down for me, cause I clueless when it comes to technology.
iPhone can't do iBooks.
If it gets released as an .epub file though (which I think the rumors are saying) you should be able to add it via iTunes.
Automatically Appended Next Post: Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:Rather, imho, because it makes no sense to preorder some digital release. The whole point of preordering is being sure not to wait if your local reseller become out of stock. Digital release never go out of stock. I may be wrong, but I don't think GW ever proposed preorder for digital releases.
Great News!
Limited release eBooks, downloads will stop after they hit 1000 copies!
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/02 06:53:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/02 07:21:49
Subject: Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Until they restock the bits.
|
Cratfworld Alaitoc (Gallery)
Order of the Red Mantle (Gallery)
Grand (little) Army of Chaos, now painting! (Blog) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/10/02 08:49:23
Subject: Re:Sisters of Battle codex thingie in the latest WD
|
 |
Three Color Minimum
|
Troike wrote: KalashnikovMarine wrote: Troike wrote:
Exalted. I think that the pessimism surrounding the SoB really can get unreasonable sometimes, it's good to realise that things don't always point towards the worst outcome, there's plenty of evidence that we'll get a good outcome.
pretre if you could remind us exactly how long it's been since the first rumors of plastic Sisters again? Have we hit two decades yet?
And if I could remind you that I already adressed that by pointing out that the developers have consistently said that they've had modelling issues, until just recently?
Was the issue they hadn't made any?
If someone kept telling you they would mail the check tomorrow after a decade would you still believe them?
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|