Switch Theme:

Emergency disembarking into buildings?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Fresh-Faced New User




Just clear this up for myself, it seems this discussion is about having my transport destroyed and the unit inside then diving into a building with it's forced disembark movement?

If this is the case, it cannot be done. Models can only voluntarily embark during the movement phase. (p.78)

 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran




Toxium wrote:
Models can only voluntarily embark during the movement phase. (p.78)
Since it's possible for a vehicle to wreck itself in its own movement phase, the question is still open, albeit rather more narrow in scope.
   
Made in gb
Tough Tyrant Guard





SHE-FI-ELD

OP has his answer, opponents disembark was legal

It's my codex and I'll cry If I want to.

Tactical objectives are fantastic 
   
Made in us
Flashy Flashgitz





 Nem wrote:
OP has his answer, opponents disembark was legal


Uh, actually it wasn't legal, the picture I selected wasn't what we were using on vassal, we were using a building, I thought that picture I posted represented a building, but apparently it doesn't. Read the title of the thread next time.
   
Made in gb
Tough Tyrant Guard





SHE-FI-ELD

I did read the title of the thread, I did assume the pic you posted was simular looking to what you were using, which is a ruin (lack of contained walling) perhaps then your opponent believed it was meant to represent a ruin.


(edit) just 're read your posts and you do say the terrain you were using looked like the picture, sorry this is defiantly a ruin not a building - to clarify, a ruin is generally open top and has incomplete walls, you can move around in a ruin and move up and down floors.buildings generally are
closed spaces and have a roof, buildings have access points and fire points, you don't move your models around in a building on the board. So yeah if it looked like that and no one told him it's a count as building not really his fault.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/10/06 00:10:24


It's my codex and I'll cry If I want to.

Tactical objectives are fantastic 
   
Made in us
Flashy Flashgitz





 Nem wrote:
I did read the title of the thread, I did assume the pic you posted was simular looking to what you were using, which is a ruin (lack of contained walling) perhaps then your opponent believed it was meant to represent a ruin.


(edit) just 're read your posts and you do say the terrain you were using looked like the picture, sorry this is defiantly a ruin not a building - to clarify, a ruin is generally open top and has incomplete walls, you can move around in a ruin and move up and down floors.buildings generally are
closed spaces and have a roof, buildings have access points and fire points, you don't move your models around in a building on the board. So yeah if it looked like that and no one told him it's a count as building not really his fault.


Do you even know what vassal 40k is?
   
Made in au
Hoary Long Fang with Lascannon




Armageddon, Pry System, Armageddon Sector, Armageddon Sub-sector, Segmentum Solar.

Niexist wrote:
 Nem wrote:
I did read the title of the thread, I did assume the pic you posted was simular looking to what you were using, which is a ruin (lack of contained walling) perhaps then your opponent believed it was meant to represent a ruin.


(edit) just 're read your posts and you do say the terrain you were using looked like the picture, sorry this is defiantly a ruin not a building - to clarify, a ruin is generally open top and has incomplete walls, you can move around in a ruin and move up and down floors.buildings generally are
closed spaces and have a roof, buildings have access points and fire points, you don't move your models around in a building on the board. So yeah if it looked like that and no one told him it's a count as building not really his fault.


Do you even know what vassal 40k is?


It doesn't matter, the question as presented was answered numerous times. As for Vassal it's the poor man's 40k and imo has no place here. That said your. rule question was answered, you and your opponent should have discussed the terrain before the battle, so don't get snippy at us if you're not satisfied with the answer.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: