Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/20 01:12:12
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel
|
Conversion beamer then.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/20 01:22:17
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Honored Helliarch on Hypex
|
Why don't the servo skulls reduce the scatter from an orbital strike relay?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/20 01:36:01
Subject: Re:Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Adolescent Youth with Potential
Western Australia
|
Because the orbital strike rule says "always scatters the full 2D6"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/20 01:36:26
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Honored Helliarch on Hypex
|
ah, right, of course. Thanks.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/20 02:26:50
Subject: Re:Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Secretive Dark Angels Veteran
|
The question is, how come no one else can have an Orbital Strike Relay except for Karamazov?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/20 03:07:37
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator
|
"eh I don't see the huge benefit of 2 coteaz anyway.."
Well... its obvious...it's how he has been doing the "I've been expecting you" thing all these years...
There an Imperial Standard Template on him somewhere....
|
If I was vain I would list stuff to make me sound good here. I decline. It's just a game after all.
House Rule -A common use of the term is to signify a deviation of game play from the official rules.
Do you allow Forgeworld 40k approved models and armies? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/20 06:06:29
Subject: Re:Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Speed Drybrushing
|
Asmodai Asmodean wrote:The question is, how come no one else can have an Orbital Strike Relay except for Karamazov?
Because in the book they copy-pasted from, he and the tech marine were the only ones to have it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/20 12:30:27
Subject: Re:Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
Magc8Ball wrote:Asmodai Asmodean wrote:The question is, how come no one else can have an Orbital Strike Relay except for Karamazov?
Because in the book they copy-pasted from, he and the tech marine were the only ones to have it.
And the Grand Master.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/20 13:23:28
Subject: Re:Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Secretive Dark Angels Veteran
|
They introduce a piece of wargear which according to fluff is accessible to most inquisitors, then limit its usage to a single special character? So lazy.
Just because they copypasted from the GK codex doesn't mean they can't update the new one with more gear options beside relics.
50 points for it is ridiculous, anyway.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 13:17:41
Subject: Re:Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
Just reading over the Codex and thinking the Karamazov and Wheels would make a good pairing. Send Wheels into the enemy with his superior mobility, drop the bomb on him, he tanks with his 3++ and EW while the enemy gets pasted, then Wheels charges to get locked in and does it all again next turn.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 20:22:40
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
they actually upgraded the orbital bombardment in C:I too
in C'GK its "always scatters full 2d6, even if a hit is rolled youuse the small arrow, no minusing the BS of user"
in C:i it hits on a hit, and still no - the BS, but still, it CAN hit now.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 20:48:14
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Yes but, the C:GK version could be used as often as you liked and the C:I version is once per game.
This greatly reduces Inquisitor Krazypants' gimmick.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 21:01:18
Subject: Re:Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Noble Knight of the Realm
|
I've read a number of times in this thread that ALL Imperium of Man armies get Inquisitors as Battle Brothers. This is, sadly, not correct if you factor in Forgeworld lists. I emailed forgeworld to ask them about my Death Korps of Krieg and they said that Codex: Inquisition is "Come the Apocalypse" for Krieg armies. Which I thought was rather daft considering that in the Seige of Vraks the whole Krieg army is placed under the command of the Inquisition/Hector Rex, but there you have it.
Asmodai Asmodean wrote:They introduce a piece of wargear which according to fluff is accessible to most inquisitors, then limit its usage to a single special character? So lazy.
Well, one of the warlord traits, "Burner of Worlds" (which I believe all three ordos of inquisitor has access to) gives you the orbital strike relay. So you have a 1/6 chance of getting it in any given battle.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 21:15:11
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Monster-Slaying Daemonhunter
Grand Rapids Metro
|
7th Edition needs to take Prescience off the Primaris...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 21:25:12
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 21:26:26
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
Lanlaorn wrote:Yes but, the C: GK version could be used as often as you liked and the C:I version is once per game.
Nope, this just means you need to install the update for your Codex
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 21:28:42
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Monster-Slaying Daemonhunter
Grand Rapids Metro
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 23:24:32
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
Lanlaorn wrote:Yes but, the C: GK version could be used as often as you liked and the C:I version is once per game.
This greatly reduces Inquisitor Krazypants' gimmick.
no its not... i have latest version of C:I... and now where does it say orbital bombardment is one shot only now...perhaps you are confusing it with the warlord trait orbital bombardment which is one shot
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/21 23:44:07
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
@easysauce
On release day the dex said one shot. You probably have the updated version.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 06:11:18
Subject: Re:Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
Yeah, don't you love silent updates?
|
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 07:00:56
Subject: Re:Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
*A chorus of 10,000 voices call out in unison* "NO!!!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 08:04:13
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Yep, I love them better than the alternative of update once every 6 years. Is update monthly and tell me about it an option?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 09:58:04
Subject: Re:Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Sneaky Striking Scorpion
South West UK
|
dracpanzer wrote:Was trying to run my Raven Guard using the 'scout' rule with vehicles and Shrike with a bare bones VVS with infiltrate today. I'm trying to use the craptastic Chapter Trait they got because everyone keeps telling me how good it is. Opponent had two Inq's, each with three servo skulls, put up a belt of servo-skulls outside my deployment zone, and a couple on the only bits of cover they didn't have occupied in their half of the table. Best 18pts you'll ever spend IMO. Couldn't move a single model forward with scout, and infiltrate left me no options. This is going to put a serious dent in some of the advantages of Ravenwing, White Scars, Raven Guard, SoB/Dominions, CSM/Huron armies. As far as my Raven Guard go, think I'll head back to my drop pod lists.
Don't forget to get your inquisitor with servo skulls so that your drop pods wont scatter far! Every army now needs cheap inquisitors!
Gallows humour aside, I think your post is part of the trickle that turns into a flood. I'll be interested to see these forums in a month and see how many of us now find we're routinely facing Inquisitors most battles.
|
What is best in life?
To wound enemy units, see them driven from the table, and hear the lamentations of their player. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 11:53:32
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Speed Drybrushing
|
They probably are doing these day-two changes in an attempt to foil piracy, since most of the time these digital codexes are online in a matter of minutes after their release.
|
Rokugnar Eldar (6500) - Wolves of Excess (2000) - Marines Diagnostica (2200)
tumblr - I paint on Twitch! - Also a Level 2 Magic Judge |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 16:03:37
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Pyro Pilot of a Triach Stalker
|
Anyone have a summary of the update and what changed?
|
01001000 01100001 01101001 01101100 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110010 00100000 01001110 01100101 01100011 01110010 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101111 01110110 01100101 01110010 01101100 01101111 01110010 01100100 01110011 00100001 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 17:34:32
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
buddha wrote:Anyone have a summary of the update and what changed?
Razorbacks back to BS4. OSR no longer one-use only. DCAs and Crusaders back to having Power Swords. Basically a return to the things that were changed from the GK in the first place.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 17:56:42
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Pyro Pilot of a Triach Stalker
|
Godless-Mimicry wrote: buddha wrote:Anyone have a summary of the update and what changed?
Razorbacks back to BS4. OSR no longer one-use only. DCAs and Crusaders back to having Power Swords. Basically a return to the things that were changed from the GK in the first place.
Thanks man. I'm pissed that crusaders can't take poweraxes now but oh well.
|
01001000 01100001 01101001 01101100 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110010 00100000 01001110 01100101 01100011 01110010 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101111 01110110 01100101 01110010 01101100 01101111 01110010 01100100 01110011 00100001 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 21:38:21
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
Magc8Ball wrote:They probably are doing these day-two changes in an attempt to foil piracy, since most of the time these digital codexes are online in a matter of minutes after their release.
That would be assuming an unjustified level of competence from GW. More likely this is just another case of GW's complete lack of playtesting or proofreading, combined with the realization that they can be lazy and not bother to publish an FAQ if they just edit the digital book directly.
|
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 22:37:55
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
What about force weapons for inquisitors?
There are several stats for force weapons on the back but the original version i saw still had inquisitors only taking force swords.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 1117/04/20 00:25:48
Subject: Inquisition (divination psyker) allies now mandatory?
|
 |
Unhealthy Competition With Other Legions
|
buddha wrote: Godless-Mimicry wrote: buddha wrote:Anyone have a summary of the update and what changed?
Razorbacks back to BS4. OSR no longer one-use only. DCAs and Crusaders back to having Power Swords. Basically a return to the things that were changed from the GK in the first place.
Thanks man. I'm pissed that crusaders can't take poweraxes now but oh well.
Why not? They come stock with a power weapon, so you are well within your rights to give them power axes.
Edit: Just saw the update. My dreams are dashed...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/11/22 23:23:42
amanita wrote:So dare I ask what happens if he farts? Could it blow the seals on the lower portion of his armor? Or is a space marine's system immune to such mundane fluctuations of bodily conduct?
Moktor wrote:No one should be complaining about this codex. It gave regular Eldar a much needed buff by allowing us to drop Fire Dragons and D-Scythe Wraithguard wherever we want, without scatter. Without this, I almost lost a game once. It was scary. I almost took to buying fixed dice to ensure it never happened again. |
|
 |
 |
|