Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 21:40:26
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ok, with the new realease I'm thinking that there's going to be lots of people with shoebox Titans and Firby Heirophants while they lament about how expensive the real model is [but promise to get one soon]. So, you've agreed to a game of Escalation, but do you allow proxy super heavies?
Edit - as rightly pointed out below, I'm talking about proxies, not 'counts as', so changed the title.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/12/15 21:46:48
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 21:41:54
Subject: 'Counts as' superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
WA, USA
|
Depends on the other player entirely.
|
Ouze wrote:
Afterward, Curran killed a guy in the parking lot with a trident.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 21:44:36
Subject: Re:'Counts as' superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
@ OP, technically what you're talking about is proxying. A counts as would be a model that isn't the actual product, but represents it well enough to be WYSIWYG and very similar in dimensions.
I would allow a proper counts as or nice scratchbuild, but proxying would be iffy. Maybe a one off scenario to give it a run, but not more.
*Edit after title change* I'm generally not a fan of consistent proxying, but fine with it to test something out if its a general size and shape. Anything more and I'd expect my opponent to make an effort at getting an appropriate model, whether the actual thing or a proper counts as.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/12/15 21:51:26
Mordian Iron Guard - Major Overhaul in Progress
+Spaceship Gaming Enthusiast+
Live near Halifax, NS? Ask me about our group, the Ordo Haligonias! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 21:46:40
Subject: 'Counts as' superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Morphing Obliterator
Elsewhere
|
Yes, if it looks good enough or funny.
I do not even need to be told that they are getting one soon.
|
‘Your warriors will stand down and withdraw, Curze. That is an order, not a request. (…) When this campaign is won, you and I will have words’
Rogal Dorn, just before taking the beating of his life.
from The Dark King, by Graham McNeill.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 21:49:41
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
If it is close enough to the actual model, yes. Or in the case of the TC'tan, any C'tan shard model will do as long as it is of sufficient size.
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 22:13:35
Subject: Re:Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Pustulating Plague Priest
|
If it is or is close to the same size as the superheavy, a baneblade can be a large book and I'd still go with it.
|
Faithful... Enlightened... Ambitious... Brethren... WE NEED A NEW DRIVER! THIS ONE IS DEAD! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 22:16:57
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
CthuluIsSpy wrote:If it is close enough to the actual model, yes. Or in the case of the TC'tan, any C'tan shard model will do as long as it is of sufficient size.
Yep, I use some old Inquisitor minis as C'tan along my actual C'tan, and they work quite nicely without me having to use the same two minis mutiple times. It makes knowing who has what abilities far easier, also.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 22:23:23
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
NO,
or more of if you dont have one and your oppenent DEMANDS to field theirs then more no to them.
its hard to proxy superheavies... their sheer size means you cant use a landraider as a baneblade etc, so i am against someone turning up to a game against me and saying this is a reaver titan...... when i am not even remotely prepared for it, same as i wouldnt deploy a titan or equivilant against someone that wasnt expecting it..
|
CSM 20,000 Pts
Daemons 4,000 (ish)
WoC over 10,000
6000+ Pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 22:36:29
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Using Object Source Lighting
|
Yes, under at least one of two conditions:
1- someone wants to test it out before pouring a lot of time and money in a potentially trash (rules-wise) model
2- it's a very good conversion (clever, well done, funny, etc.) and not just an excuse to use a really powerful model. You could write "bolter marine" and "terminator" on scraps of paper or pill bottles, but I'm in it for the hobby and don't enjoy playing against wholly unpainted armies, and sure as hell wouldn't want to play against an upturned waste paper basket with "warhound" written on it
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/12/15 22:36:47
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 22:40:36
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
spiralingcadaver wrote:Yes, under at least one of two conditions:
1- someone wants to test it out before pouring a lot of time and money in a potentially trash (rules-wise) model
2- it's a very good conversion (clever, well done, funny, etc.) and not just an excuse to use a really powerful model. You could write "bolter marine" and "terminator" on scraps of paper or pill bottles, but I'm in it for the hobby and don't enjoy playing against wholly unpainted armies, and sure as hell wouldn't want to play against an upturned waste paper basket with "warhound" written on it
Pretty much this. I knew one guy who made a cardboard and plastic stompa, and I was totally fine with it, since it was roughly the same size, had the right details, was painted and had the correct loadout. If someone tries to proxy a dread or a plain cardboard box as a stompa though? Forget it.
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 22:56:08
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Wondering Why the Emperor Left
|
I would allow a regular opponent to proxy a super-heavy if they wanted to try it out and see how it performed before buying it. I would not allow a proxy in a random pick-up game unless we had pre-agreed that they wished to test that model out. I don't buy the "super-heavies are too expensive, I can't afford one" argument because most SHV are cheaper for their points than a conventional army. A squad of Dire Avengers is £20.50 for 65 points, a ratio of 3.17 points per pound. A Lynx is £76.00 for 420 points, a ratio of 5.52 points per pound. Even factoring in shipping a Lynx is considerably cheaper for the points than Dire Avengers, but nobody would ever complain the latter is too expensive. You can't even argue that the total price of the Lynx is too high, because there are plenty of armies with at least 20 Dire Avengers, by which point they are more expensive than the Lynx. To use a different example, a Rhino costs £22.50 and 35 points - about 1.6 points per pound. A Warhound titan with two weapon arms costs £331 and is worth 720 points, for a ratio of about 2.2 points per pound. It's significantly better value to get a titan rather than some Rhinos for your Space Marine army, and this time you get free shipping as well. I simply can't see a reason that anyone who could afford a full army couldn't save up and get a super-heavy vehicle as part of that.
|
Currently not in posession of any armies - I merely theorycraft and discuss background,
Waiting for HH Book 6 so I can start an Imperial Army army. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 23:36:57
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Jervis Johnson
|
thisisnotaseriousaccount wrote:I would allow a regular opponent to proxy a super-heavy if they wanted to try it out and see how it performed before buying it. I would not allow a proxy in a random pick-up game unless we had pre-agreed that they wished to test that model out. I don't buy the "super-heavies are too expensive, I can't afford one" argument because most SHV are cheaper for their points than a conventional army. A squad of Dire Avengers is £20.50 for 65 points, a ratio of 3.17 points per pound. A Lynx is £76.00 for 420 points, a ratio of 5.52 points per pound. Even factoring in shipping a Lynx is considerably cheaper for the points than Dire Avengers, but nobody would ever complain the latter is too expensive. You can't even argue that the total price of the Lynx is too high, because there are plenty of armies with at least 20 Dire Avengers, by which point they are more expensive than the Lynx. To use a different example, a Rhino costs £22.50 and 35 points - about 1.6 points per pound. A Warhound titan with two weapon arms costs £331 and is worth 720 points, for a ratio of about 2.2 points per pound. It's significantly better value to get a titan rather than some Rhinos for your Space Marine army, and this time you get free shipping as well. I simply can't see a reason that anyone who could afford a full army couldn't save up and get a super-heavy vehicle as part of that.
Well said my man, well said. Rhinos are crazy expensive point per pound. It's actually a pretty fun exercise to go through various 40K and fantasy armies to see what the actual most expensive models are. I remember when Chaos Warhounds (the dogs, not the Titans) were available only in metal you got 10 in a box for like 35£. Considering the models were only worth 30 or 40 points on the battlefield that wasn't a very good deal  They were the most expensive GW model at that time atleast.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2013/12/15 23:40:43
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 23:40:32
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
All the people playing eldar or eldartau here , wanted to play their WK as reventants . They were told a hard no . So I guess it is a no for everyone else . But then again it may just be the revenant , because one of the eldar veterans here owns a chiness Revenant and he can't use that one either.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 23:41:21
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
Makumba wrote:All the people playing eldar or eldartau here , wanted to play their WK as reventants . They were told a hard no . So I guess it is a no for everyone else . But then again it may just be the revenant , because one of the eldar veterans here owns a chiness Revenant and he can't use that one either. What's a chinese revenant? And yeah. WK definitely are not revenants. They don't even have the right dimensions.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/12/15 23:42:05
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 23:45:14
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Lot of people buy resin models from china , much cheaper then buying it from UK and people can buy just the parts they need like weapons and stuff.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/15 23:58:11
Subject: Re:Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
[Mod Edit - Dakka Dakka in no way condones the use of such things/places/etc. - Alpharius]
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/12/16 01:54:52
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 00:00:13
Subject: Re:Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Sybarite Swinging an Agonizer
|
I'm fine with proxying anything to playtest. I proxy when I'm thinking of getting something and want to know if it works how I think it will. So to clarify I'd be fine with proxies in anything but a tournament. In a tournament it should be the model or a conversion/scratch built of appropriate size. If I don't have it I don't play it in tournies and I hold my opponents to the same standard.
|
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/507548.page Trade with me!
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/486232.page Painting Blog
If you're interested in my commission work check my gallery.
https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=c7975d6a-4d3f-4d26-8040-b402e1e3bde9&action=buddy |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 01:07:33
Subject: Re:Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
On-topic: no to proxies. If you have a decent counts-as model because you want to use something cool, I'll probably allow it. If you want to bring a powerful unit without putting the time and effort into making the real model then too bad.
Off-topic: remember that forum rule about discussing illegal recasts? Please follow it.
|
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 01:35:26
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
|
Well that's an even split in the poll if I've ever seen one, haha. I voted yes. I don't really see myself playing Escalation with the state of my army, but if I wanted to in the future I wouldn't mind a proxy.
|
Paradigm wrote:The key to being able to enjoy the game in real life and also be a member of this online community is to know where you draw the line. What someone online on the other side of the world that you've never met says should never deter you from taking a unit for being either weak or OP. The community is a great place to come for tactics advice, and there is a lot of very sound opinions and idea out there, but at the end of the day, play the game how you want to... Don't worry about the hordes of Dakka descending on your gaming club to arrest you for taking one heldrake or not using a screamerstar. Knowing the standard opinion (and that's all it is) on what is good/bad and conforming to that opinion religiously are two entirely separate things. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 02:36:01
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
Well lets say, someone heavily converted a properly sized Abrams tank for a baneblade I Would say sure, and a one off friendly thing sure, but if you plan on bringing a titan every game you had best be buying yourself that titan
|
DA 4000 points W/L/D 6e 3/2/0
IG 1500 points W/L/D 6e 0/2/0
And 100% Primed! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 02:46:27
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
How about a Barbie doll for an Eldar Revenant Titan? Maybe the one wings?
|
"You can bring any cheesy unit you want. If you lose. Casey taught me that." -Tim S.
"I'm gonna follow Casey; he knows where the beer's at!" -Blackmoor, BAO 2013
Quitting Daemon Princes, Bob and Fred - a 40k webcomic |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 02:53:04
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
No thanks. Super heavies are supposed to be something special. Have the right model or go play monopoly.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 03:06:51
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Amongst the regular game group for testing stuff out,sure lets build one out of Legos!
But at even the lowest competitive levels ..you better bring an award winning kitbash or the FW model if ya want to play it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 03:15:34
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Guarded Grey Knight Terminator
|
I'm fine with any sort of well-executed purpose-built alternative model or scratchbuild. Yes to things like carefully detailed and constructed papercraft. No to things like titans slapped together out of shoeboxes and paper towel rolls in half an hour and sprayed red.
|
One unbreakable shield against the coming darkness, One last blade forged in defiance of fate.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 03:26:06
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Makumba wrote:
Well they look identical . I don't have a credit card so am not realy interested in that stuff , but from what I have seen people can buy everything FW makes in China for cheaper. One dude bought a whole w30k army and braged he paid less then 1/4 of what they want in UK for the same models.
Besides the fact it's supporting theft by buying from such people, I don't think I'd trust them with my credit card number. Karma can be such a bitch.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 03:38:34
Subject: Re:Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
Well if you're going to plunk down that kind of money you have to know how it's going to play!
Unless you really just want the model for the collection and not so much to use then yeah whatever, buy it before you try it. Otherwise you should probably do some proxies.
Y'all just remember that before GW was fat and bloated and too powerful to care they used to give us free plans for building our own superheavies in White Dwarf magazine, and they were made out of paper.
Just remember that before you get stiff about proxy or counts as. Automatically Appended Next Post: kronk wrote:No thanks. Super heavies are supposed to be something special. Have the right model or go play monopoly.
What if the OP doesn't have all the pieces?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/12/16 03:40:16
Gets along better with animals... Go figure. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 03:53:57
Subject: Re:Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
darkcloak wrote:Well if you're going to plunk down that kind of money you have to know how it's going to play!
Unless you really just want the model for the collection and not so much to use then yeah whatever, buy it before you try it. Otherwise you should probably do some proxies.
Y'all just remember that before GW was fat and bloated and too powerful to care they used to give us free plans for building our own superheavies in White Dwarf magazine, and they were made out of paper.
Just remember that before you get stiff about proxy or counts as.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
kronk wrote:No thanks. Super heavies are supposed to be something special. Have the right model or go play monopoly.
What if the OP doesn't have all the pieces?
Yep, I built some of the Ork vehicles, but out of plastic. We had a guy in our Epic group that was a line worker out in the willie whacks when he was on shift and in his off time in the middle of nowhere built vehicles out of cardboard. He had armies of the things and they looked great on the table.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 06:32:39
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Beast Lord
|
Proxy? No. Superheavies are too big and too much could hinge on the actual model for something like that.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 07:24:18
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
If you want to play such a special unit I expect a scratchbuild or an original model. What is someone proxies 500 points in a battle, that is the same right? Only now is it just one model. I already think that a super heavy should stay in apocalypse, so if you really want to play a super heavy, make an investment first.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/16 10:53:21
Subject: Proxying superheavies in Escalation?
|
 |
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch
|
spiralingcadaver wrote:Yes, under at least one of two conditions:
1- someone wants to test it out before pouring a lot of time and money in a potentially trash (rules-wise) model
2- it's a very good conversion (clever, well done, funny, etc.) and not just an excuse to use a really powerful model. You could write "bolter marine" and "terminator" on scraps of paper or pill bottles, but I'm in it for the hobby and don't enjoy playing against wholly unpainted armies, and sure as hell wouldn't want to play against an upturned waste paper basket with "warhound" written on it
Sums it up
|
can neither confirm nor deny I lost track of what I've got right now. |
|
 |
 |
|