Switch Theme:

MC overwatch - fire 1 or 2 weapons?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

As for 3, that's actually not what the rules say.
During the shooting phase, a unit containing models armed with ranged weapons can be nominated to make shooting attacks.

So that is unit singular, attacks plural.... That means that the unit is making the attacks plural and then you're told how to resolve those shots.
Similarly their is no mention of an overwatch attack being made by the unit. A unit may fire overwatch but that's not the same.

So for a start you guys can't even read the 1st line of the description of the shooting phase's steps.

Most models refers to the normal shooting attack, the basic rules. If 1 d6 rolled for most models as their total shooting attack is more than 1 weapon at play, please explain.

It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





 liturgies of blood wrote:
1)Without permission or restriction you can fire all of your weapons.

Nope - that's your flawed interpretation. I've cited permission 3 times and you've failed to actually address it 3 times.

2) Overwatch is a shooting phase.

Nope. Unless someone I have on ignore is saying this. The rules certainly don't support it.

3) A shooting attack is a singular thing that a unit does in the shooting phase. (This is actually not what the brb says)

Um. The BRB absolutely does say that a unit can only make one shooting attack.
Because a unit that has already made one cannot be nominated to make another. Seems pretty cut and dry to me - I pointed out your mistake earlier but you again have failed to actually read and comprehend my post.

4) Because a unit could shoot multiple times a model must be able to.

Well, yes. Since there is such a thing as a single model unit, and we know there are times (commonly, ie in literally every codex) where a single model unit will shoot multiple weapons.
In addition to the fact that you were completely wrong when you said a single shooting attack could not be firing two weapons...

As for 1, is it cool for my models with two pistols and a bolter to shoot 3 times in overwatch?

According to your argument that's exactly what happens. As I've demonstrated. So are you finally agreeing?

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

 PrinceRaven wrote:
How could Overwatch possibly function without using the shooting phase rules?


It can't without the shooting rules but does that make it a shooting phase?
The assault phase cannot work without the shooting phase as it builds on it's mechanics... does that make the assault phase a shooting phase too?

It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
Made in us
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker




South Chicago burbs

 liturgies of blood wrote:
 PrinceRaven wrote:
How could Overwatch possibly function without using the shooting phase rules?


It can't without the shooting rules but does that make it a shooting phase?
The assault phase cannot work without the shooting phase as it builds on it's mechanics... does that make the assault phase a shooting phase too?


Again, if its NOT a shooting phase (which is what your implying) then page 51 doesn't apply. Page 51 has the ONLY rules for how many weapons a model may shoot. Without page 51 you may fire unlimited weapons.

Page 13 is irrelevant as it does not mention multiple weapons, only multiple shots from a single weapon. Read the rules.

insaniak wrote:
YMDC has plenty of room for discussion veering away from the RAW, particularly in cases like this where what is being put forward as the RAW is absurd.

11k
4K
4k
 
   
Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

Where does it contradict page 12, top of the page 1st line under Nominate Unit to Shoot?

Where does it say that a shooting attack is 1 per unit?

I'm actually asking. I'm not taking the piss. Where does it say that a unit can only make 1 shooting attack? I cannot see that on page 12. What it says in my brb I've pposted at the top of this page.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/02/11 04:10:06


It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





 liturgies of blood wrote:
Where does it contradict page 12, top of the page 1st line under Nominate Unit to Shoot?

Where does it say that a shooting attack is 1 per unit?

I'm actually asking. I'm not taking the piss. Where does it say that a unit can only make 1 shooting attack? I cannot see that on page 12. What it says in my brb I've pposted at the top of this page.

Step one of the shooting phase process.
Exactly like I've said multiple times.
Am I on ignore?

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
Made in us
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker




South Chicago burbs

Page 12 "choose one of your units that is able to, but has not yet fired this turn"

First step of the shooting sequence

insaniak wrote:
YMDC has plenty of room for discussion veering away from the RAW, particularly in cases like this where what is being put forward as the RAW is absurd.

11k
4K
4k
 
   
Made in au
Trustworthy Shas'vre






Are you asking where it says that a unit may not perform more than one shooting attack per shooting phase?
Page 12, 'The Shooting Sequence' cutout box, Step 1.
"Nominate a Unit to Shoot. Choose one of your units that is able to, but has not yet, fire this turn."

Words to the same effect are found just above there (page 12 2nd paragraph) and similarly in the rules summary on page 426 (with subtle variations that lead to other 'disputes')

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/02/11 04:23:30


 
   
Made in au
Tea-Kettle of Blood




Adelaide, South Australia

 liturgies of blood wrote:
 PrinceRaven wrote:
How could Overwatch possibly function without using the shooting phase rules?


It can't without the shooting rules but does that make it a shooting phase?
The assault phase cannot work without the shooting phase as it builds on it's mechanics... does that make the assault phase a shooting phase too?


Well, either:
1. A "normal shooting attack" is considered to be one made in the shooting phase and uses all of the shooting phase rules, so MCs can fire 2 weapons in overwatch.
2. Overwatch is completely divorced from the shooting phase and after overwatch is declared you don't have any rules to tell you how to resolve the shooting attack.
3. Some shooting phase rules apply but not others, and we arbitrarily decide which ones work and which ones don't because the overwatch rules, unlike the the assault phase rules, do not specify.

 Ailaros wrote:
You know what really bugs me? When my opponent, before they show up at the FLGS smears themselves in peanut butter and then makes blood sacrifices to Ashterai by slitting the throat of three male chickens and then smears the spatter pattern into the peanut butter to engrave sacred symbols into their chest and upper arms.
I have a peanut allergy. It's really inconsiderate.

"Long ago in a distant land, I, M'kar, the shape-shifting Master of Chaos, unleashed an unspeakable evil! But a foolish Grey Knight warrior wielding a magic sword stepped forth to oppose me. Before the final blow was struck, I tore open a portal in space and flung him into the Warp, where my evil is law! Now the fool seeks to return to real-space, and undo the evil that is Chaos!" 
   
Made in gb
Ultramarine Chaplain with Hate to Spare





As for 3, that's actually not what the rules say.
During the shooting phase, a unit containing models armed with ranged weapons can be nominated to make shooting attacks.

So that is unit singular, attacks plural.... That means that the unit is making the attacks plural and then you're told how to resolve those shots.


How many shooting attacks does a unit of 10 models get to make during Overwatch?

Here's what the rules have go say on the matter:

BrB page 20 wrote:
Then, the target enemy unit gets to make a special kind of shooting attack called Overwatch (see opposite)


Emphasis mine.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/02/11 12:14:07


Take the Magic: The Gathering 'What Color Are You?' Quiz.

Yes my Colour is Black but not for the reasons stated mainly just because it's slimming... http://imperiusdominatus.blogspot.com 
   
Made in gb
Sinewy Scourge




So are you saying that they can only take one shot (e.g. if they have an assault cannon they fire a single shot instead of four)?

Also I'm pretty sure that the article a is relating to the noun kind, not attack.

Edit: Fixing spelling and grammar in this grammar related post.

This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2014/02/11 13:50:35


 
   
Made in gb
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego





Canterbury

 liturgies of blood wrote:
1 is at least one. I'm sorry English allows for subjectivity of meaning but you're really desperate to call me a liar. Stop. I've asked repeatedly for you et al to stop and I'd appreciate we debate the issue and not the man.



Indeed.


It's toy soldiers not a court of law.

The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king,
 
   
Made in gb
Ultramarine Chaplain with Hate to Spare





Drager wrote:
So are you saying that they can only take one shot (e.g. if they have an assault cannon they fire a single shot instead of four)?

Also I'm pretty sure that the article a is relating to the noun kind, not attack.

Edit: Fixing spelling and grammar in this grammar related post.


No I'm staying they make 1 shooting attack which is comprised of potentially many shots from potentially many weapons. It is still 1 shooting attack.

Take the Magic: The Gathering 'What Color Are You?' Quiz.

Yes my Colour is Black but not for the reasons stated mainly just because it's slimming... http://imperiusdominatus.blogspot.com 
   
Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

That's not what the rules say fling. The rules say that a unit makes shooting attacks.
There is no rules basis for a unit only making 1 shooting attack.
So there is no basis for the a shooting attack is multiple attacks.

It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
Made in gb
Ultramarine Chaplain with Hate to Spare





Well in Overwatch you only get to make 1 shooting attack...

Take the Magic: The Gathering 'What Color Are You?' Quiz.

Yes my Colour is Black but not for the reasons stated mainly just because it's slimming... http://imperiusdominatus.blogspot.com 
   
Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

So overwatch is one shot only? As it's described as 1 shooting attack while the shooting phase describes a plural of shooting attacks for a unit.

So is a shooting attack all of a unit's shots as per overwatch or is it one of a number of attacks a unit can carry out as per the shooting phase rules?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/02/11 18:00:48


It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
Made in gb
Ultramarine Chaplain with Hate to Spare





A shooting attack contains a number of shots from a number of weapons as described in the shooting rules. In overwatch you get 1 shooting attack which contains a number of shots from number of weapons as described in the shooting rules.

You've still failed to show a denial of the permission you agree is present to fire multiple weapons. Please cite that or concede.

Take the Magic: The Gathering 'What Color Are You?' Quiz.

Yes my Colour is Black but not for the reasons stated mainly just because it's slimming... http://imperiusdominatus.blogspot.com 
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





 liturgies of blood wrote:
That's not what the rules say fling. The rules say that a unit makes shooting attacks.
There is no rules basis for a unit only making 1 shooting attack.
So there is no basis for the a shooting attack is multiple attacks.

Really? So the following sentence doesn't exist in the rules?
p12 wrote:Nominate Unit to Shoot. Choose one of your units that is able to, but has not yet, fire this turn.

You should take your rulebook and get a new copy then - it's defective.

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

That doesn't mean one shooting attack per unit. It means you can make shooting attacks once a turn.

You should take back your assertions they're defective.

It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





 liturgies of blood wrote:
That doesn't mean one shooting attack per unit. It means you can make shooting attacks once a turn.

No, it means that you cannot nominate a unit for a shooting attack after it has completed one.
That means the unit can only make a singular shooting attack because when you attempt to nominate for a second shooting attack you are forbidden.

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

You seem to be missing the top of page 12 where it says you nominate a unit to make shooting attacks....
I agree the rules say you cannot choose a unit that has already fired this turn. That doesn't state that a shooting attack is one per unit.

Please explain why the rules say something different to you?


It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





 liturgies of blood wrote:
You seem to be missing the top of page 12 where it says you nominate a unit to make shooting attacks....
I agree the rules say you cannot choose a unit that has already fired this turn. That doesn't state that a shooting attack is one per unit.

Please explain why the rules say something different to you?

I'm not missing that at all.

After reading more into it, however, each model fires a shooting attack as part of a unit.
So each model makes a shooting attack. I have permission to roll a d6 for every weapon in range for my shooting attack.
Why are you forbidding me from rolling 1 of those d6?

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

Ok, now we are getting somewhere. You stance has evolved as opposed to being wrong.

So a shooting attack is equated with a model firing? Y/N

It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
Made in us
Monster-Slaying Daemonhunter




Grand Rapids Metro

 reds8n wrote:
 liturgies of blood wrote:
1 is at least one. I'm sorry English allows for subjectivity of meaning but you're really desperate to call me a liar. Stop. I've asked repeatedly for you et al to stop and I'd appreciate we debate the issue and not the man.



Indeed.


It's toy soldiers not a court of law.


*Initiates slow clap*

Come play games in West Michigan at https://www.facebook.com/tcpgrwarroom 
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





 liturgies of blood wrote:
Ok, now we are getting somewhere. You stance has evolved as opposed to being wrong.

So a shooting attack is equated with a model firing? Y/N

A model fires. That firing is resolved as a shooting attack.
I think that's the most correct way to put it.

For vehicles it's slightly different - each weapon is a single shooting attack.

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
Made in us
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker




South Chicago burbs

 liturgies of blood wrote:
Ok, now we are getting somewhere. You stance has evolved as opposed to being wrong.

So a shooting attack is equated with a model firing? Y/N


How is it that his opinion is wrong?

Your the one who hasn't backed up anything with rules.

insaniak wrote:
YMDC has plenty of room for discussion veering away from the RAW, particularly in cases like this where what is being put forward as the RAW is absurd.

11k
4K
4k
 
   
Made in ie
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard





Ireland

Ok. So a shooting attack is firing a weapon, yes a vehicle gets a few attacks etc. So you'd agree a normal shooting attack for a MC is not firing two weapons? A MC gets two normal shooting attacks in the shooting phase?

So the shooting attack for most models is 1 dice unless their weapon says they have shots? Y/N

It's not the size of the blade, it's how you use it.
2000+
1500+
2000+

For all YMDC arguements remember: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vbd3E6tK2U

My blog: http://dublin-spot-check.blogspot.ie/ 
   
Made in us
Raging Ravener






 liturgies of blood wrote:
Ok, now we are getting somewhere. You stance has evolved as opposed to being wrong.

So a shooting attack is equated with a model firing? Y/N


Dude, we are on page 4. You have yet to make a solid argument for your cause and refuse to acknowledge the other side of the debate.

Why don't you take a day to reorganize your side of the discussion and continue this tomorrow? You aren’t going to win anyone over at this point in time and you have yet to concede an inch. At this point, both sides might as well be screaming at a wall.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/02/11 21:20:21



Lots and lots and lots. 
   
Made in us
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker




South Chicago burbs

 liturgies of blood wrote:
Ok. So a shooting attack is firing a weapon, yes a vehicle gets a few attacks etc. So you'd agree a normal shooting attack for a MC is not firing two weapons? A MC gets two normal shooting attacks in the shooting phase?

So the shooting attack for most models is 1 dice unless their weapon says they have shots? Y/N


No. Page 51 tells you exactly how many weapons you can shoot, and the weapons profile tells you how many shots. Those are printed rules, not assertions like the ones you continue to make.

insaniak wrote:
YMDC has plenty of room for discussion veering away from the RAW, particularly in cases like this where what is being put forward as the RAW is absurd.

11k
4K
4k
 
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





 liturgies of blood wrote:
Ok. So a shooting attack is firing a weapon, yes a vehicle gets a few attacks etc. So you'd agree a normal shooting attack for a MC is not firing two weapons? A MC gets two normal shooting attacks in the shooting phase?

No, I would not agree to that - there is nothing stating that. Ever.
So far the only reference I can see to a model having multiple shooting attacks is vehicles.

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: