| Poll |
 |
|
|
 |
| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/31 15:15:35
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Hello everyone.
I've found all the fluff I can on the subject, and still have not come to a real conclusion, so I guess I decided to ask here. What do you all think the best regimental command vehicle is for an Imperial Guard Armored Regiment?
1) Traditional superheavy - baneblades, shadowswords, all the 3-structure-point behemoths from ages ago.
2) Modernized superheavy - Malcador, Macharius, or one of the other 2-structure point superheavies
3) Leviathan Command Vehicle - In 3rd Edition and Epic, this is an option for a regimental command.
4) Other - Leman Russ, Salamander, anything else, put in a response and why!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/31 15:32:44
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
over there
|
From what I've read a leviathan is used for control of a theatre of war, often a general will live in it and meet his officers in it. Baneblades and things based off of the baneblade chassis seem to be to armoured regiments what ogryns are to infantry, they are attached when needed.
I think it would depend on the commander and if the regiment is mechanized infantry or not. A mechanized infantry regiment would definitely use something like a leviathan or more likely in the field a chimera or salamander, whilst a regiment consisting of tanks would more likely have a tank commander/leman russ with antenna on top like a real world command tank.
However a tank regiment may employ a baneblade or banblade based vehicle for its leader, but that depends on their relation to the meachanicus and your personal preference.
|
The west is on its death spiral.
It was a good run. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/31 15:43:21
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
|
The Home Nuggeteer wrote: However a tank regiment may employ a baneblade or banblade based vehicle for its leader, but that depends on their relation to the meachanicus and your personal preference.
That's about it.
In the books I've read, the really big tanks are either a separate division all-together or a single big one will be at the center of an armored fighting force (think of a modern carrier task force, with the biggest ship in the center surrounded by the smaller vessels.) commanding the rest.
the Levi' is more used as an overall Mobile HQ for an entire army battle group commanding multiple regiments, more often then not being behind the lines giving orders and sometimes support fire.
|
Regiment: 91st Schrott Experimental Regiment
Regiment Planet: Schrott
Specialization: Salvaged, Heavily Modified, and/or Experimental Mechanized Units.
"SIR! Are you sure this will work!?"
"I HAVE NO IDEA, PULL THE TRIGGER!!!" 91st comms chatter. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/31 16:23:48
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Keeper of the Holy Orb of Antioch
avoiding the lorax on Crion
|
Id go traditional super hevey tank as by sounds the bigger ones are ment to control entire battle groups and not play so much role in smaller battles unless its a pivotal objective that has to be taken and whole campaign resting on it.
|
Sgt. Vanden - OOC Hey, that was your doing. I didn't choose to fly in the "Dongerprise'.
"May the odds be ever in your favour"
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:
I have no clue how Dakka's moderation work. I expect it involves throwing a lot of d100 and looking at many random tables.
FudgeDumper - It could be that you are just so uncomfortable with the idea of your chapters primarch having his way with a docile tyranid spore cyst, that you must deny they have any feelings at all. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/31 17:38:03
Subject: Re:Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Maybe a....
CRASSUS ARMORED ASSAULT TRANSPORT
Basically a Regiment needs its coms and data-feeds where the Main HQ is, so anything with great access to information is better than pure Battle-Tanks.
I'd say the Companies are lead from the front ( a Battle-Tank variant ), the Regiment should use a mobile HQ and therefore a well protected transport vehicle.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/31 18:43:31
Subject: Re:Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
It would depend on the commander. But, I would imagine that most commanders would ride around in a Chimera or Leman Russ equipped with extra comms equipment.
If he was a particularly bold commander he may use a Baneblade or other superheavy for his command tank. It would put him more at risk, though.
|
Thought for the day: Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.
30k Ultramarines: 2000 pts
Bolt Action Germans: ~1200 pts
AOS Stormcast: Just starting.
The Empire : ~60-70 models.
1500 pts
: My Salamanders painting blog 16 Infantry and 2 Vehicles done so far! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/31 20:17:38
Subject: Re:Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Blood-Drenched Death Company Marine
|
TheCustomLime wrote:It would depend on the commander. But, I would imagine that most commanders would ride around in a Chimera or Leman Russ equipped with extra comms equipment.
If he was a particularly bold commander he may use a Baneblade or other superheavy for his command tank. It would put him more at risk, though.
This, Decide on the personality of the Commander and then you'll have your answer.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/01 03:44:54
Subject: Re:Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
Other: LRBT variant of some kind, probably with the Mars Alpha hull favored by commanders for its extra internal space. Alternatively, a Chimera variant might make sense if your regimental commander is a proper leader and doesn't engage in direct combat, but that wouldn't be very interesting from a gaming perspective.
"Old" superheavies are kind of a questionable choice because they're traditionally deployed as separate units that are reserved for the most important battles, so they wouldn't be integrated very well into the everyday operations of a regiment. A higher-ranking officer in charge of a wide area of the battle might use one as a command vehicle, but would probably give broad strategic orders while the regimental officers deal with the tactical situation of executing those orders. On the other hand, if you want to go with the GW approach of the commander being the biggest badass on the front lines instead of sitting in the back commanding, a Baneblade or Shadowsword is an awesome super-tank that fills that role very nicely and you can probably come up with a fluff justification for it.
A "modern" superheavy doesn't make sense because they aren't modern. Fluff-wise they're obsolete second-tier units at best (Malcador, Macharius) or specialized support units (Valdor, Minotaur). Nobody would ever willingly choose one for a command vehicle when a Baneblade or Shadowsword is available, and even a LRBT/Chimera might be a better choice since the smaller tank is less likely to attract excessive amounts of attention from anti-tank units.
A Leviathan is probably the least likely choice. It's a ridiculously stupid vehicle that should have been deleted from the fluff, even by GW standards.
|
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2014/08/01 05:37:03
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/01 10:00:48
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Humorless Arbite
|
Go for one of the Malcadors or Macharius tanks. They're actually 'ancient' though, not modern. I say that simply because they're rarer and therefore more epic. A manly commander would choose a manly ride
If I ever get a superheavy it'll be either a Malcador Defender or a Malcador Infernus, both of them appeal to me.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/01 10:28:03
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
Sweden
|
Why not a stormlord? Plenty of space inside for staff and close protection guard squads.
|
7002 points. Rozth 9th/9th Siege Infantry. CO: Fältöverste Karl Hagan
4000 points. Order of the true Voice. Cult Leader: Sorcerer Ziyad Un-Nefer #AvengeProspero
Praetorian Guard/ Lascari Light Brigade: 2000 points, Huzzah!
Bretonnia: 2000 points (Forever WIP)
[Hey, you! Check out ProHammer Classic] |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/02 17:48:20
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Leader of the Sept
|
Given the size of the superheavies there is probably a decent amount of space for a command space, or a neural link f8r the commander.
|
Please excuse any spelling errors. I use a tablet frequently and software keyboards are a pain!
Terranwing - w3;d1;l1
51st Dunedinw2;d0;l0
Cadre Coronal Afterglow w1;d0;l0 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 08:01:09
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Storm Trooper with Maglight
In Warp Transit to next battlefield location, Destination Unknown
|
I am of the opinion that Infantry Regimental commanders would use Chimera as their command vehicle. RRegimental Tank commanders would use a Leman Russ variant. Artillery Regiment commanders would be in an Artillery vehicle or a Chimera.
The super heavy vehicles would be reserved for Generals and above commanders. Those are the officers in charge of Brigades/Divisions/Corps/Armys.
|
Cowards will be shot! Survivors will be shot again!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/07 17:03:36
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
SYKOJAK wrote:I am of the opinion that Infantry Regimental commanders would use Chimera as their command vehicle. RRegimental Tank commanders would use a Leman Russ variant. Artillery Regiment commanders would be in an Artillery vehicle or a Chimera.
The super heavy vehicles would be reserved for Generals and above commanders. Those are the officers in charge of Brigades/Divisions/Corps/Armys.
What if your regiment has two companies of superheavy tanks?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 00:27:38
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
|
The fluff for Leviathans was that they were pretty ubiquitous at the regimental level:
Armies of the Imperium page 46/47:
"A regiment almost always has several Leviathans operating behind the lines, maintaining communications with all HQs in that zone. If your army does not include a Leviathan then it is assumed that the regimental HQ is behind the lines.."
"If your army does include a Leviathan then there is a risk of it being eliminated, destroying your entire chain of command. However because there are always more Leviathans waiting to take over the chain of command is only broken for 1 turn."
If the regiment has superheavies then I'd go for a Leviathan, otherwise however I'd stick with something fast enough to keep up with the rest of the Regiment. My personal choice would be a "relic" Malcador Defender converted to a command post, the Malcador (Heavy Tank, not Superheavy) was retired from front line service because the Imperium lost the ability to maintain its engines - during the Heresy it was a Fast vehicle.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 00:32:25
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
Gashrog wrote:My personal choice would be a "relic" Malcador Defender converted to a command post, the Malcador (Heavy Tank, not Superheavy) was retired from front line service because the Imperium lost the ability to maintain its engines - during the Heresy it was a Fast vehicle.
This is actually one of the worst options, as the defender variant is described as having a very cramped hull because of how many gunners it needs. A command vehicle needs space for the extra crew and equipment, which means some other tank.
|
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 00:45:16
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
I also vote Malcador. If you wanted to be creative you could modify the Malcador defender (which is an awesome model btw) to not have the guns above and turn it into the commanders office/bunker.
From there he can see in many directions, have space and so on. And more importantly, ride in style.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/08 00:50:49
Subject: Armored Regimental Command dilemma
|
 |
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
|
Peregrine wrote:
This is actually one of the worst options, as the defender variant is described as having a very cramped hull because of how many gunners it needs. A command vehicle needs space for the extra crew and equipment, which means some other tank.
What Swastakowey suggests is exactly what I had in mind when I said 'converted'
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|