Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

The Cohort Cybernetica Formation for the Cult Mechanicus needs fixing. The Formation calls for 1 Tech-Priest Dominus and 2 Kastelan Robot Maniples, not just two Robots. A Kastelean Robot Maniple is 2 Kastelan Robots and 1 Datasmith. So by default, the Formation comes with 1 Tech Priest Dominus, 4 Kastelans, and 2 Datasmiths.

Currently the Formation only has 1 Maniple in it.

Building an Eldar list, using a CAD, found some problems with the Crimson Hunter.

For the weapons, <none> should not be an option. If you need that there due to the way it’s done in the background, it should raise a flag for “need to pick one”

Upgrading to the starcannons is also generating an error, even if exarch is selected. I played around a bit, and thought I could get it to come up without an error, but when I was going back to verify as I was posting this, it gave me an error every time.

Minor things -
Dark Angels: Can't seem to select "standalone add-on Formations" like the Ravenwing Attack Squadron
Space Marines: The Seismic Hammer on the Ironclad Dreadnought seems to be missing its description, whereas everything else seems to be intact.

The Ordo Malleus Inquisitor can't take any weapons upgrades. Has anyone else noticed this?

 CrashGordon94 wrote:
Minor things -
Dark Angels: Can't seem to select "standalone add-on Formations" like the Ravenwing Attack Squadron

Sorry, missed that.

Are you sure? I can't reproduce them. You need to include a Formation Detachment, then every available formation shows up.

Oh, that's the thing, I wasn't doing it as part of a Lion's Blade, just to test out making a stupidly cheap hypothetical Ravenwing army using the Ravenwing Attack Squadron (That IS legit, is it not?).

Also not sure if I checked it with Vanilla Marines but considered having their Anti-Air formation standalone too, which is for an actual future army development idea, rather than just for funsies.

Has the Space Marine Quad Mortar been added into the various Space Marine chapters and I am just missing it?

Dark Angels - The Unrelenting Hunt formation is incorrect
- The Ravenwing Attack Squad instead points to the link for a Ravewing Bike Squad
- The base Ravenwing Dark Talon entry is incorectly spelled as Darktalon in BS.

Just my $0.02

Sammael is the only hq selectable on battlescribe, can you add an option like with the fw allowed to add the other hq options, to allow for non raw nonsense.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
For the ravenwing formation

CrashGordon94 wrote:Oh, that's the thing, I wasn't doing it as part of a Lion's Blade, just to test out making a stupidly cheap hypothetical Ravenwing army using the Ravenwing Attack Squadron (That IS legit, is it not?).

Also not sure if I checked it with Vanilla Marines but considered having their Anti-Air formation standalone too, which is for an actual future army development idea, rather than just for funsies.

I'm not talking the about the Lion's Blade Detachment, but a Formation Detachment. It's its own detachment type like a CAD. You need that and they will show up.

casvalremdeikun wrote:Has the Space Marine Quad Mortar been added into the various Space Marine chapters and I am just missing it?

I think that slipped under our collective radards for now. I'll try and remember to open an issue so it gets implemented in the various catalogues.

ServiceGames wrote:Dark Angels - The Unrelenting Hunt formation is incorrect
- The Ravenwing Attack Squad instead points to the link for a Ravewing Bike Squad
- The base Ravenwing Dark Talon entry is incorectly spelled as Darktalon in BS.

Just my $0.02

I'll take a look at those $0.02 later today

Formosa wrote:Sammael is the only hq selectable on battlescribe, can you add an option like with the fw allowed to add the other hq options, to allow for non raw nonsense.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
For the ravenwing formation

I did that a while ago. Other HQ's are selectable, but you get a RAI warning in the roster rules. It should be released for a few days now already.

Are you sure? I see the options for the Chaplain, Interrogator-Chaplain and Librarian alongside Sammy.
Have you updated your data recently?


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 Thairne wrote:
I'm not talking the about the Lion's Blade Detachment, but a Formation Detachment. It's its own detachment type like a CAD. You need that and they will show up.

Alright, will try that, thank you!

Edit: Tried that and it works! By the looks of it the Ravenwing Attack Squadron can be the cheapest (points-wise) Battle Forged Marine army ever.

I built a Nid list taking 30 termagants to unlock a Tervi as troops choice and got this error (standard primary CAD):

CAD has one too many selecions of Tervigon (maximum 0)
-> increment max inforce1 (repeating)

Any ideas?

Did you select the 40 pt group option for Termagants and increase to thirty Termagants? That's probably why the error came up.

Cick the 'Termagant Brood for Tervigon' option, that should stop the error.

Spot on mate, forgot about the termagant for tervi option. Thanks!

IM not sure if it's been talked about before, But I would loved to see improvements to battlescribe that deal with the way rosters print. They are always cut off in weird places or in the middle of rules. Is there a way for it to print in a more segmented fashion for use during games so that info is more clearly separated and the page breaks fall at more appropriate places?

Also, this may already be there but is there a way to add notes to a unit? I often wish that I could write individual notes for units to remind me of things during game play. I usually just do it in pencil after printing but if I could include it as part of the roster that would be ideal.

Thanks!

 Thairne wrote:

Formosa wrote:Sammael is the only hq selectable on battlescribe, can you add an option like with the fw allowed to add the other hq options, to allow for non raw nonsense.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
For the ravenwing formation

I did that a while ago. Other HQ's are selectable, but you get a RAI warning in the roster rules. It should be released for a few days now already.

I did notice that when I updated my data fairly recently. There are other HQs that can be chosen, but the RAI warning does come up if you do.

SG

Edit: Oh, and thanks for looking into The Unrelenting Hunt formation

I don't think I got the RAI warning when I picked an Int-Chap for that slot.

One more thing. The FW Mark V Mortis Pattern Dreadnought point values are all incorrect as of the latest updates from FW.

SG

I noticed Craftworld Eldar is still not fixed.

Warlock Council still charges double for the first Warlock.

Farseer Skyrunner upgrade is flagged "collective" meaning every Farseer has it or none do.

I checked back to make sure I was on the right Inquisitor, but I still can't give a Malleus Inquisitor a daemonblade upgrade.

If I choose Imperial Knights as an Allied detachment, I can't add any Imperial Knights to that force.

Demon prince from the Chaos Space Marines codex shows 2 warlord selection options, and can only take a single weapon.

Should be able to take multiple weapons, including gifts etc.

When I take a Gladius Strike Force with the Space Marines, and I take a bike squad, the roster says it's illegal.

ServiceGames wrote:
One more thing. The FW Mark V Mortis Pattern Dreadnought point values are all incorrect as of the latest updates from FW.

SG

Which updates are those? There hasn't been an update to any of the FW Dreadnoughts in years.

ServiceGames wrote:
Dark Angels - The Unrelenting Hunt formation is incorrect
- The Ravenwing Attack Squad instead points to the link for a Ravewing Bike Squad

Well that would be because the Bike Squad was, at the time of the formation release, the attack squad.
Of course you could argue that the new book changed that, but considering that the formation is intented for the models sold in the DV+expansion....

So I updated the software and the Space Marines Bikes are missing from Troops AGAIN -even if you have Kor'sarro Khan for example.

Why does this keep coming back? Has to be the 3rd time.

Pressing the "Upgrade to new version..." ends up in an error.

After the last CSM push it fixed the marine and cultist issues, but now the zombies are not an option when selecting typhus. although this is not a game breaker, it was cool to see zombie as an option when i printed my sheets. Formations work correctly now though.

Hats off to the community for the work on this project.

The Seismic Hammer's info still isn't showing up and I've updated to the latest version even, maybe look into that?

1. Still unable to give the Ordo Malleus Inquisitor any weapon upgrades.

2. Also unable to upgrade Seer Council with Jetbikes.

Conclave of the Burning One formation seems to be unable to access the Mephrit relics (god shackle, etc.), unless I am missing some step.