| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/04 12:26:25
Subject: 6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Shas'ui with Bonding Knife
|
What formations would you like to see?
For Tau:
Long strike's Hammerhead Squadron:
3 Hammerheads (1must include Longstrike)
All Hammerheads get tank hunter and Long strike gets twin-linked.
Kroot Hunting Pack
4 Kroot squads, must include 1 shaper and only 1 shaper.
All Kroot gain furious charge.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/04 12:48:58
Subject: 6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
I'd like to see an IG formation based on taking multiple infantry platoons.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/04 16:34:18
Subject: 6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Sisters Formation based on Penance (Repentia, Confessor (which we need back first), Penitent Engines and Arco-flagellants (and pershaps a mob of some kind if we get one). Basically give them a buff of some kind to make getting across the board easier so they can punch the heresy out of their foe.
Outside of that, perhaps a formation based on each of the kinds of Sister (Dominions getting buffs based on load out, Retributors either getting Relentless or some kind of extra range, Exorcists getting a mass fire option of some kind, ect).
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/04 16:43:26
Subject: Re:6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Grim Rune Priest in the Eye of the Storm
|
Guard:
>Rough Rider Formation
>All Tank Formation
Dark Angels:
>All Deathwing Formation [or Detachment]
>All Ravenwing Formation [or Detachment]
Chaos Marines:
>A Formation [or Detachment] for each of the Chaos Gods.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/04 16:51:36
Subject: 6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
A Stealer and Lictor formation where they get to assault after they run and when assaulting through terrain they don't strike at Initiative 1. What should it entail? I guess 3 Lictors acting separately and 5 broods of 5 or 10 broods of Stealers. Is it effective? No idea. It would be fun for me in playing a fluffy way though.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/01/04 16:52:26
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/04 18:52:32
Subject: 6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
Deathwatch Space Marines
- 1 Watch Captain and 2+ Sternguard with Preferred Enemy (Xeno)
Any Eldar Formations with Craftworld specific methods of play. Illic and Pathfinders, Biel-Tan Aspect Warriors, Saim-Hann Jetbikes and Vypers, all with some bonus unavailable in the normal codex and none including a Wraithknight.
Any Imperial Guard Formations or Detachments... A Catachan Detachment with 1 Heavy Support and 6 Fast Attack and Stealth (Forests) Would be a very interesting thing to see pop up.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/04 19:45:27
Subject: Re:6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Sisters: A sisters formation of Penitent Engines, Arco-flagellants and Repentia would be nice. Could give them Fleet, Furious Charge and Shred (and allow the penitent engines to get a cover save at the cost of a Repentia or flagellant).
Daemons: A formation of Skull Cannons with Soul Blaze.
Chaos Space Marines: A formation of Defilers, Forge-Field - Mauler-Fiends, A Hel-Drake, A pack of Hel-brutes, Obliterators, A Sorcerer and a Warpsmith that can inflict "Gets Hot !" to a target squad or unit's weapons and "Immobilized' results to enemy vehicles, or can pick one of his daemon engines and bestow the ability to activate its daemon forge more than once per game.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/01/04 19:48:48
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/04 21:55:43
Subject: Re:6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Wing Commander
|
Armageddon Steel Legion:
X Platoons all Chimera mounted, and X Chimera Veteran squads, chimera vets get BS4 chimera and the regulars get, I don't know, a bit extra movement or some other buff of some sort.
Something to make regular infantry in Chimeras a non objectively bad choice versus vets.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/01/04 21:56:01
Therefore, I conclude, Valve should announce Half Life 2: Episode 3.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/05 05:11:18
Subject: Re:6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
Generally speaking, my ideal here is to address weaker units to try to make them more desireable.
such as if I was putting together a formation for Grey Knights, I'd do something that enhances the use and appeal of purgation and strike squads. with that said..
Space Marines: Veteran Assault force. 1+ squads of assault terminators. 2+ squads of vanguard veterns. must deep strike in, and may assault out of deep strike.
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/05 05:55:59
Subject: Re:6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Chaos Space Marines
A formation that allows you to apply the Chaos Marks to Terminators, Helbrutes, Defilers, Heldrakes, and other Demon Engines.
Legion-specific formations (Night Lords taking Raptors as troops, Iron Warriors taking Havocs as troops, etc.).
In short - all the things that should have been in the codex to begin with.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/01/05 05:56:16
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/05 06:58:34
Subject: Re:6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
NuggzTheNinja wrote:
Legion-specific formations (Night Lords taking Raptors as troops, Iron Warriors taking Havocs as troops, etc.).
.
raptors and havocs as troops are unlikely given Slot mixing up shinnagens seems to be on it's way out, but I agree a formation or detachment for each legion'd be awesome.
for Iron warriors I'd make more troops mandatory, but give em extra heavy support.
so something like
Mandatory: 1 HQ, 3 troops. Optional: 1 HQ, 3 troops, 3 elite, 3 fast attack, 4 heavy support.
maybe trade objective secured on troops for all heavy support getting armorbane and a +1 to pen rolls vs fortifications?
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/05 07:18:12
Subject: Re:6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
|
I want a formation of grots.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/05 08:25:47
Subject: 6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Trustworthy Shas'vre
|
I expect a forthcoming end to if X is your warlord take Y as troops style FOC swaps, and alternate troops based on detachment. So with that in mind I propose the following.
Tau
- The Eight become a formation
- Farsight Detachment has extra elite slots, and a mandatory Crisis team instead of turning Crisis into troops
- Formation/Detachment optimized for Shadowsun and a lot of troops
-Vespid formation giving them twin-linked off the Deep Strike or something so that people take them
Marines
- No more bikes as troops but Formations/Detachments to represent Elite and Reserve companies
|
Tau and Space Wolves since 5th Edition. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/06 22:42:38
Subject: Re:6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Gargantuan Grotesque With Gnarskin
|
NuggzTheNinja wrote:Chaos Space Marines
A formation that allows you to apply the Chaos Marks to Terminators, Helbrutes, Defilers, Heldrakes, and other Demon Engines.
Legion-specific formations (Night Lords taking Raptors as troops, Iron Warriors taking Havocs as troops, etc.).
In short - all the things that should have been in the codex to begin with.
Termies can already take marks (unless you're talking about Daemonic alignments and not marks of chaos).
I'd love to see more legion specific organization in the way that SM get chapter tactics, though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/06 22:46:47
Subject: Re:6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Grim Rune Priest in the Eye of the Storm
|
lustigjh wrote: NuggzTheNinja wrote:Chaos Space Marines
A formation that allows you to apply the Chaos Marks to Terminators, Helbrutes, Defilers, Heldrakes, and other Demon Engines.
Legion-specific formations (Night Lords taking Raptors as troops, Iron Warriors taking Havocs as troops, etc.).
In short - all the things that should have been in the codex to begin with.
Termies can already take marks (unless you're talking about Daemonic alignments and not marks of chaos).
I'd love to see more legion specific organization in the way that SM get chapter tactics, though.
I would love for them to go ahead and just make the Chaos Marine Codex as big as the Space Marine Codex with the Legion themed "Chapter Tactics", Detachments and Formations.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/07 08:30:40
Subject: 6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Boosting Space Marine Biker
|
I'd like to see if Vanilla Marines get ANY formations (dataslates won't count).
|
Innocentia Nihil Probat.
Son of Dorn |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/07 18:40:09
Subject: Re:6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
MajorStoffer wrote:Armageddon Steel Legion:
X Platoons all Chimera mounted, and X Chimera Veteran squads, chimera vets get BS4 chimera and the regulars get, I don't know, a bit extra movement or some other buff of some sort.
Something to make regular infantry in Chimeras a non objectively bad choice versus vets.
What about this:
Armageddon Steel Legion Armoured Battle Group Formation:
1 Platoon Command Squad
2-4 Infantry Squad
Restrictions: All units must choose a dedicated transport and begin embarked in the vehicle.
Special rules:
- Mechanised Infantry: All units are immune to the passenger effects when their Transport receives a Crew shaken, Crew stunned, Weapon destroyed or Immobilised result (meaning, they don't need to take a Leadership test to see if they're stuck snap firing).
- Defensive Action: If a unit from this formation is embarked on a Transport under assault, they may disembark at the start of the Assault phase in order to enter combat; gaining +1 attack/model.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/01/07 18:41:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/07 19:38:48
Subject: Re:6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Wing Commander
|
mr. peasant wrote: MajorStoffer wrote:Armageddon Steel Legion:
X Platoons all Chimera mounted, and X Chimera Veteran squads, chimera vets get BS4 chimera and the regulars get, I don't know, a bit extra movement or some other buff of some sort.
Something to make regular infantry in Chimeras a non objectively bad choice versus vets.
What about this:
Armageddon Steel Legion Armoured Battle Group Formation:
1 Platoon Command Squad
2-4 Infantry Squad
Restrictions: All units must choose a dedicated transport and begin embarked in the vehicle.
Special rules:
- Mechanised Infantry: All units are immune to the passenger effects when their Transport receives a Crew shaken, Crew stunned, Weapon destroyed or Immobilised result (meaning, they don't need to take a Leadership test to see if they're stuck snap firing).
- Defensive Action: If a unit from this formation is embarked on a Transport under assault, they may disembark at the start of the Assault phase in order to enter combat; gaining +1 attack/model.
That's actually pretty awesome, and fits the theme of the Steel Legion being crazy enough to charge orks and occassionally not all die.
|
Therefore, I conclude, Valve should announce Half Life 2: Episode 3.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/01/07 22:37:58
Subject: 6th Ed Codex Updates - What Formations Would You Like to see?
|
 |
Missionary On A Mission
|
Sister of Battle Formation: 3+ Battle Sister Squads with unlimited acts of Faith and Stubborn.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|