Switch Theme:

New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Requizen wrote:
Do you think it's better to have 3 units of 4+ Tomb Blades or 2 units of 3+?

Trying to make points fit and really the only places I can pare down are in the Tomb Blades.

The 3+ is entirely worth the price. They aren't the most killy unit, but making it harder to force them to jink means they're slugging out plenty of shots.

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

What weapons do you guys take on Tomb Blades?

 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard




Gauss 100% of the time. I've never felt like I missed Tesla procs, and if you Jink, Gauss is better in every fashion.

The Particle small blasts are nice, but have a good chance of just scattering off and small blasts only hit ~2 things on average anyway unless your opponent really likes clumping super close. And if you Jink, they do nothing.

Gauss is the all around best choice, imo.
   
Made in us
Brainy Zoanthrope





VA

Agree on Gauss. I like the particle blasters, but would probably only take it on a third unit after having 2 units of gauss.

   
Made in fi
Regular Dakkanaut





Finland

It turns out it IS possible to kill a full-court lychstar in practice too, not just in theory. 10 wraith guard with D-scythes + a couple of D-weapon batteries will actually do it when you've already used your solar staff the previous turn...

Won't be quite that aggressive against that type of list again, that's for damn sure.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/09/15 20:59:20


Number = Legion
Name = Death 
   
Made in us
Rampaging Carnifex





Fredericksburg, Virginia

 MLKTH wrote:
It turns out it IS possible to kill a full-court lychstar in practice too, not just in theory. 10 wraith guard with D-scythes + a couple of D-weapon batteries will actually do it when you've already used your solar staff the previous turn...

Won't be quite that aggressive against that type of list again, that's for damn sure.


Hah yikes. D-scythes are brutal man. Even if you do get the charge, they'll wipe you out in overwatch. Be sure to charge them with scarabs or something expendable first to eat the overwatch.

6000+
2500
2000
2000
 
   
Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

Requizen wrote:
Gauss 100% of the time. I've never felt like I missed Tesla procs, and if you Jink, Gauss is better in every fashion.

The Particle small blasts are nice, but have a good chance of just scattering off and small blasts only hit ~2 things on average anyway unless your opponent really likes clumping super close. And if you Jink, they do nothing.

Gauss is the all around best choice, imo.


Does squad size make any difference?

I ask because I only run 3 (as a result of only having 3 models ), and 3 TL gauss shots just seem a bit... pitiful compared to 3 small blasts.

 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard




 vipoid wrote:
Requizen wrote:
Gauss 100% of the time. I've never felt like I missed Tesla procs, and if you Jink, Gauss is better in every fashion.

The Particle small blasts are nice, but have a good chance of just scattering off and small blasts only hit ~2 things on average anyway unless your opponent really likes clumping super close. And if you Jink, they do nothing.

Gauss is the all around best choice, imo.


Does squad size make any difference?

I ask because I only run 3 (as a result of only having 3 models ), and 3 TL gauss shots just seem a bit... pitiful compared to 3 small blasts.


Even 3 small blasts isn't that much. Tomb Blades aren't for killing, they're for MSU, being fast, and drawing fire as they capture/contest objectives.
   
Made in jp
Proud Triarch Praetorian





I've actually had luck with units that have 1 Particle small blast and the rest G.Blasters.
Reason being, players tend to clump their units up behind cover. If I can drop one ignore cover blast on them when they're like that i can hit maybe 3 even 4 bases if I'm lucky with scatter. Then the rest of the squad can hit the stragglers with Gauss.

 
   
Made in us
On a Canoptek Spyder's Waiting List




Dallas, Texas

I don't have a lot of other horde control in my army, so the small blasts are great for taking out chaff. Perhaps even more importantly, it makes my opponent have to choose between packing their hordes together for better charge density or spreading them out to mitigate the blasts. I like taking units and making moves that cause my opponent to have to make potentially sub-optimal choices. That's kinda just my play style, though.

But also, str6 that ignores cover is pretty nifty all on its own.

Not that gauss isn't good, though. It is. But when I take 3 units of tomb blades, I only take one unit of gauss and 2 units of beamers. When I only take one unit of tomb blades, they're beamers.
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard





Virginia

 vipoid wrote:
What weapons do you guys take on Tomb Blades?


I back the Gauss statement. AP4 Ignores Cover with Gauss just has too many options for what it can kill.

40k:
8th Edtion: 9405 pts - Varantekh Dynasty  
   
Made in us
Rampaging Carnifex





Fredericksburg, Virginia

After realizing how easily I can kill Malenthropes and Venomthropes inside ruins with Gauss Tomb Blades, I stuck with gauss.

6000+
2500
2000
2000
 
   
Made in mx
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan




Mexico

Zimko wrote:
After realizing how easily I can kill Malenthropes and Venomthropes inside ruins with Gauss Tomb Blades, I stuck with gauss.

Eh... Malanthropes have a 3+ armor save.
   
Made in us
Rampaging Carnifex





Fredericksburg, Virginia

 Tyran wrote:
Zimko wrote:
After realizing how easily I can kill Malenthropes and Venomthropes inside ruins with Gauss Tomb Blades, I stuck with gauss.

Eh... Malanthropes have a 3+ armor save.


Touche, my last opponent thought it was 4+ and played it that way, thus my confusion. Well I guess either weapon works fine for this purpose to ignore cover.

6000+
2500
2000
2000
 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard





Virginia

Zimko wrote:
 Tyran wrote:
Zimko wrote:
After realizing how easily I can kill Malenthropes and Venomthropes inside ruins with Gauss Tomb Blades, I stuck with gauss.

Eh... Malanthropes have a 3+ armor save.


Touche, my last opponent thought it was 4+ and played it that way, thus my confusion. Well I guess either weapon works fine for this purpose to ignore cover.


I'd still say Gauss, because most Tyranids (that aren't forgeworld) have a 4+ or worse save: all infantry (Warriors, gaunts), important things like Lictors and Venomthropes, and the new MCs coming out (more specifically, the Toxicrene, which relies on cover or a 4+ armor).

So Gauss is my way to go for Nids.

40k:
8th Edtion: 9405 pts - Varantekh Dynasty  
   
Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

Looks like I'm going Gauss next game.

Thanks for saving me 6pts, guys.

 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in us
Wicked Canoptek Wraith





 vipoid wrote:
Looks like I'm going Gauss next game.

Thanks for saving me 6pts, guys.


Pump that into your Spyder, or find four points and get a gauntlet of flame.

- 10000+ pts
Imperial Knights- 5 Standard Knights / 3 Cerastus Knights
Officio Assassinorum - 4 Assassins
CSM - 500pts? Maybe? Its from the Officio Assassinorum box so I'm pretty sure its not enough to run in a CAD
Vampire Lords- I have no idea I bought it like two days before I left country and they're still in storage so I'll have to see when I get back.] 
   
Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

 Mantorok wrote:


Pump that into your Spyder, or find four points and get a gauntlet of flame.


Already got one.

In all probability though, I'll just use those points to buy something different for the Tomb Blades - either 3+ saves or Nebuloscopes.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/09/17 08:57:08


 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in fi
Regular Dakkanaut





Finland

You were using beamers without nebuloscopes? What is this heresy?!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/09/17 09:01:15


Number = Legion
Name = Death 
   
Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

 MLKTH wrote:
You were using beamers without nebuloscopes? What is this herecy?!


I had Nebuloscopes at first, but then after messing around with the formations in my army I ended up 6pts over. I thought 3 small blasts would be more useful than 3 Gauss Shots with Ignores Cover so I dropped the Nebuloscopes.

 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard





Virginia

 vipoid wrote:
 MLKTH wrote:
You were using beamers without nebuloscopes? What is this herecy?!


I had Nebuloscopes at first, but then after messing around with the formations in my army I ended up 6pts over. I thought 3 small blasts would be more useful than 3 Gauss Shots with Ignores Cover so I dropped the Nebuloscopes.


I dunno about you guys, but my list is built around having Nebuloscopes and 3+ armor saves. If that means I'm taking one less Warrior, I'm taking one less warrior.

40k:
8th Edtion: 9405 pts - Varantekh Dynasty  
   
Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

Well, I have 20 Warriors in my Decurion. If you can work out a way to legally remove one, I'm all ears.

 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard





Virginia

 vipoid wrote:
Well, I have 20 Warriors in my Decurion. If you can work out a way to legally remove one, I'm all ears.


Oh, it also helps if you normally bring more than 20.

40k:
8th Edtion: 9405 pts - Varantekh Dynasty  
   
Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

 krodarklorr wrote:
 vipoid wrote:
Well, I have 20 Warriors in my Decurion. If you can work out a way to legally remove one, I'm all ears.


Oh, it also helps if you normally bring more than 20.


Maybe my experiences are different, but I find that Warriors rarely accomplish much - it's generally Wraiths, Destroyers etc. that are the workhorses of my army. Hence, I went for having 2 formations (in this case Destroyer Cult and Judicator Battalion), rather than having more warriors and only 1 formation.

At 1500pts, it's a bit of a squeeze.

 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard





Virginia

 vipoid wrote:
 krodarklorr wrote:
 vipoid wrote:
Well, I have 20 Warriors in my Decurion. If you can work out a way to legally remove one, I'm all ears.


Oh, it also helps if you normally bring more than 20.


Maybe my experiences are different, but I find that Warriors rarely accomplish much - it's generally Wraiths, Destroyers etc. that are the workhorses of my army. Hence, I went for having 2 formations (in this case Destroyer Cult and Judicator Battalion), rather than having more warriors and only 1 formation.

At 1500pts, it's a bit of a squeeze.


Oh. Yeah I hardly play 1500 point games.

40k:
8th Edtion: 9405 pts - Varantekh Dynasty  
   
Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

Please stop faceplaming me...

 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard





Virginia

 vipoid wrote:
Please stop faceplaming me...



40k:
8th Edtion: 9405 pts - Varantekh Dynasty  
   
Made in jp
Proud Triarch Praetorian





So... no one else does mixed weapons on Tomb Blades?
Am... am I doing it wrong?
Is there a statistical reasoning behind it, or is it just a case of Necron players not being used to being able to mix and match weapons in units so they stick with everybody A or B, but never A and B?

 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard





Virginia

 skoffs wrote:
So... no one else does mixed weapons on Tomb Blades?
Am... am I doing it wrong?
Is there a statistical reasoning behind it, or is it just a case of Necron players not being used to being able to mix and match weapons in units so they stick with everybody A or B, but never A and B?


Well, rule of thumb is that mixing weapons in general is bad. But yeah, I would never do it on Tomb Blades. Either more Gauss shots towards that vehicle (in which case the Beamer would go to waste) or a ton of S6 blasts, but those few Gauss shots will be wasted.

40k:
8th Edtion: 9405 pts - Varantekh Dynasty  
   
Made in jp
Proud Triarch Praetorian





I'm talking 1 blast/4-5 gauss ratio, here.
(as mentioned before, blast goes over guys clumped up behind cover for maximum hits, gauss goes toward everything else)

 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: