Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I haven't seen any mold defects or warping in my experience (Shadowsun, Ethereal, about 6 Kroot Hounds, all purchased a little over 6 months ago) except for one tiny bubble on the Ethereal's foot, which wasn't visible under the robes anyway.

I have seen enough pictures to know that problems exist, but it seems like the material had some major issues when it was first put into production and it has gotten better since then.

The modeling characteristics though...I do not like working with Finecast because it feels really brittle and likely to snap just by breathing on it. Would not at all be annoyed if they replaced it with another material; although, I still prefer it a lot over metal (which in my experience is a nightmare to clean, work with, and assemble).

Despite what a lot of people say (I only realized this once I started assembling models by different companies more) GW is pretty good at the technical side of making and packaging models. I'll give them that.

 ImAGeek wrote:

 Bi'ios wrote:
I have an Imotekh, Termi Lib and Chaplain, and an Abaddon. No issues with any of them, although the Imotekh is SIGNIFICANTLY harder than the other three, and he was a lighter color. No issues with bubbles or anything like that on them. From what I have deduced, it seems like the earlier models made out of it sucked, and now they've sorted the mix out, so they seem to be much better these days.

As always, YMMV

Was the Imotekh newer? I heard some people say they got some Tau models more recently that were a harder resin, much better quality than the older finecast stuff.

I purchased it about 6 months ago, but I have no clue when it was manufactured. It was kind of an impulse buy. I just saw him sitting on the rack at the store (a FLGS, no GW's around Pittsburgh that I'm aware of). It was also my first FC purchase. I was a bit surprised that the next one I bought (Abaddon) was a bit softer, although it wasn't limp or rubbery. The Abaddon and Termi Chaplain were purchased direct, and the Termi Lib came from Ebay (a steal, too. $15, NIB)

Wow so many mountain over a mole hill. GW puts their money where there mouth is. So you got a bad product. Call the 1 800 number and GW will gladly give you a replacement. Get another bad casting, call GW again. Customer Service aims to please and make things right.

Complain all you will, whine all you will, all it does is make us look like whiney nerds and geeks. If GW didn't replace the miscasts then there would be a reason to complain. Since GW is replacing everything at no cost to us there is no reason to whine.

I got some miscasts, GW fixed my problems. Yes it sucks when it happens, but at least GW fixes the issues.

Like I said if GW doesn't fix the issue in your case then you have a right to complain and be upset. But for most people to be so upset when GW would fix their issues but they don't bother, then it's the it's just whining.

I think when people have had a number of replacements into double digits and still haven't received a decent cast, they have every right to blow their top. (It happened and was documented in a blog not long after Finecast launched)

Legitimate complaints about a poor product is not whining. Complaints that a product is so poor that the company seem unable to provide an item of adequate quality after multiple attempts are not whining.

Coming into a thread to complain about people talking about something without making any further contribution to the discussion?

That's whining.

 jasper76 wrote:
Its worth it for everyone to flat-out boycott Failcast models.

GW have shown that they know its bad...they are releasing plastic kits to replace failcast here and there (Zoan/Venomthropes)

If noone buys the stuff at all, we'll end up with more cool plastic kits.

And will plastic hobbit models appear out of nowhere?

Finecast is a stopgap while everything transitions to boxes/the single-pose plastic clampacks. It holds detail like a dream but it's absurdly flimsy and the production process had a lot of kinks early on; if you're going to do anything with Finecast you have to be extremely careful putting the models together but once they're primed it's not usually too bad unless you get a miscast.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 Da krimson barun wrote:

 jasper76 wrote:
Its worth it for everyone to flat-out boycott Failcast models.

GW have shown that they know its bad...they are releasing plastic kits to replace failcast here and there (Zoan/Venomthropes)

If noone buys the stuff at all, we'll end up with more cool plastic kits.

And will plastic hobbit models appear out of nowhere?

Someone has to start playing the Hobbit first.

The great british hobbit leuge has 2,701 subscribers.So people do play the hobbit.

 Azreal13 wrote:
I think when people have had a number of replacements into double digits and still haven't received a decent cast, they have every right to blow their top. (It happened and was documented in a blog not long after Finecast launched)

Legitimate complaints about a poor product is not whining. Complaints that a product is so poor that the company seem unable to provide an item of adequate quality after multiple attempts are not whining.

Coming into a thread to complain about people talking about something without making any further contribution to the discussion?

That's whining.

It's been done to death. Most people know that GW is phasing out Finecast, so it's going away. They know it's going away, so why bother about complaining about it? They got their wish. GW is getting rid of it.

It's more complaining about GW for complaining sakes. I don't see any legitimate complaints here. I see whining. I don't see any posts saying I that they bought a Finecast and the replacement of the replacement of the replacement were all defective. That is a legitimate complaint. None of that in this thread. Just Finecast sucks.

Again, GW replaces it. If it's still defective GW still replaces it. I don't see anywhere anyone asking for a refund and GW refusing to do so. Again, another legitimate complain, not being said.

I picked up some Warp Spiders and Pedro Cantor recently in Finecast direct from GW and they were damn near perfect, no mold lines or excess resin, though YMMV.

Davor wrote:

 Azreal13 wrote:
I think when people have had a number of replacements into double digits and still haven't received a decent cast, they have every right to blow their top. (It happened and was documented in a blog not long after Finecast launched)

Legitimate complaints about a poor product is not whining. Complaints that a product is so poor that the company seem unable to provide an item of adequate quality after multiple attempts are not whining.

Coming into a thread to complain about people talking about something without making any further contribution to the discussion?

That's whining.

It's been done to death. Most people know that GW is phasing out Finecast, so it's going away. They know it's going away, so why bother about complaining about it? They got their wish. GW is getting rid of it.

It's more complaining about GW for complaining sakes. I don't see any legitimate complaints here. I see whining. I don't see any posts saying I that they bought a Finecast and the replacement of the replacement of the replacement were all defective. That is a legitimate complaint. None of that in this thread. Just Finecast sucks.

Again, GW replaces it. If it's still defective GW still replaces it. I don't see anywhere anyone asking for a refund and GW refusing to do so. Again, another legitimate complain, not being said.

You know the beauty of a forum like this? It's pure democracy in action.

If nobody wishes to talk about a topic, then the thread pretty soon drops off the first page altogether.

If a thread keeps getting participants, then people obviously have something they wish to talk about, even if it only means letting off steam. All you accomplish by posting complaints about other people's posts is bumping a thread back to the top, where the subject may then garner further participants, keeping a thread you don't like front and centre that little bit longer.

As has been said, on numerous occasions in multiple threads, the best counter to negativity is positivity, or simply saying nothing and moving on.

All that said, it is essentially irrelevant how good GW are or have been about exchanging or refunding bad casts, they've still produced and continued to sell a gak product, which is worthy of criticism in itself, if they'd been half arsed about dealing with the issues, that would have compounded the problem.

I think for overall ruggedness seeing as how I have had my models in storage between divorce and moving etc. etc., that I would prefer metal to the Finecast resin mainly due to heat issues. However,I had a Forge World Tryanid model that is painted that bent from the heat or from having stuff pressing him down, he formed up very nicely with boiling water from the tea kettle with no need to repaint.

I bought two of the limited Space Marine Captains they made after the box cover art from 1st ed, he is Finecast and 1 model was less than perfect.

I hope they redo the models before they make them unavailable. I would rather have Finecast than nothing.

Davor wrote:
I don't see any posts saying I that they bought a Finecast and the replacement of the replacement of the replacement were all defective. That is a legitimate complaint. None of that in this thread.

Then let me make it explicit, since my first post saying that apparently wasn't clear enough: the original models were defective, the replacements were defective, and the replacements of the replacements were defective. The problem is not a few defective models that can easily be replaced, it's that finecast itself is a defective product.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 Kelly502 wrote:
I would rather have Finecast than nothing.

I'd rather have nothing, because then at least there wouldn't be units in the codex that I can't use because I'm not willing to throw away money on a finecast "model".

I recently bought Shrike and a Chaplin with jump pack and other then the frame of the sprue being bent they were really amazing and beautiful models. Heck even my old Logan Grimnar and ex-wife's Astorath The Grim were really nice. I guess we may have gotten lucky with finecast.

 Azreal13 wrote:


As has been said, on numerous occasions in multiple threads, the best counter to negativity is positivity, or simply saying nothing and moving on.

All that said, it is essentially irrelevant how good GW are or have been about exchanging or refunding bad casts, they've still produced and continued to sell a gak product, which is worthy of criticism in itself, if they'd been half arsed about dealing with the issues, that would have compounded the problem.

Oh I agree best counter is positivity. I also agree GW deserves all the criticism as well.

 Kelly502 wrote:
I would rather have Finecast than nothing.

I kind of agree with this - my understanding is that plastic tooling is very expensive. Maybe GW would have chosen not to release some of the kits that are currently in finecast if they hadn't had that option.

Don't get me wrong, I've had really mixed success with my finecast models (incubi - bad, clawed fiend - good) and I'd much rather work with plastic. But many of the actual designs are good, and it'd be shame if they hadn't seen the light of day because the company's tooling budget didn't cover production of tools for these kits.

 Kelly502 wrote:

I hope they redo the models before they make them unavailable. I would rather have Finecast than nothing.

This. At one point, I didn't buy every single solo that came out -- back then I had spending priorities other than each $20 single unit release for a faction that I didn't collect. Fast forward, now I want to collect some other faction, and I can't buy any of the finecast, because not only is it direct-only, but it's ** sold out **. I also have some annoying combinations where, for example, I bought 2 Grotesques (and they are deployed in squads of 3+), and cannot buy more.

Frankly, 80% of the finecast models I've bought are terrific. 10 % are acceptable, 5% require excessive remediation, and 5% or perhaps a little less require some replacement piece (or more greenstuff work than I'm happy with). As a material, it isn't hard to work with at all, though possibly slightly more "advanced" a material to work with than HIPS -- it sands and cuts nicely, but can be delicate (though sometimes this is just design). The thing I miss most, probably, is simply that I can't use plastic cement.

Put aside injection molded, high impact polystyrene for a moment, and consider all the other materials that models are made from: white metal, PVC, "restic" (plastic resin), that bendy vinyl/plastic stuff. All of those are far more annoying to work with, and have less optimal results from a modelling perspective.

So, while, yes, I prefer HIPS to finecast, I pretty much prefer finecast (or other resins) to most of the other alternatives. On infantry sized models, I prefer white metal to resin, but on every other size, metal just means tons of pinning. Just try some P3 PVC models, some Reaper Bones, or a GW metal dragon, and compare that to resin.

Talys wrote:

 Kelly502 wrote:

I hope they redo the models before they make them unavailable. I would rather have Finecast than nothing.

This. At one point, I didn't buy every single solo that came out -- back then I had spending priorities other than each $20 single unit release for a faction that I didn't collect. Fast forward, now I want to collect some other faction, and I can't buy any of the finecast, because not only is it direct-only, but it's ** sold out **. I also have some annoying combinations where, for example, I bought 2 Grotesques (and they are deployed in squads of 3+), and cannot buy more.

Frankly, 80% of the finecast models I've bought are terrific. 10 % are acceptable, 5% require excessive remediation, and 5% or perhaps a little less require some replacement piece (or more greenstuff work than I'm happy with). As a material, it isn't hard to work with at all, though possibly slightly more "advanced" a material to work with than HIPS -- it sands and cuts nicely, but can be delicate (though sometimes this is just design). The thing I miss most, probably, is simply that I can't use plastic cement.

Put aside injection molded, high impact polystyrene for a moment, and consider all the other materials that models are made from: white metal, PVC, "restic" (plastic resin), that bendy vinyl/plastic stuff. All of those are far more annoying to work with, and have less optimal results from a modelling perspective.

So, while, yes, I prefer HIPS to finecast, I pretty much prefer finecast (or other resins) to most of the other alternatives. On infantry sized models, I prefer white metal to resin, but on every other size, metal just means tons of pinning. Just try some P3 PVC models, some Reaper Bones, or a GW metal dragon, and compare that to resin.

I'd prefer finecast as well if it weren't for the deformeties in the model. No matter what else, I need the model to look like what it's supposed to look like.

 MWHistorian wrote:

I'd prefer finecast as well if it weren't for the deformeties in the model. No matter what else, I need the model to look like what it's supposed to look like.

Of course. I'm just saying, having bought about 100 finecast products, there were maybe 5 that I would have classified as "deformed", and GW is very good about replacing bad pieces. What I see a lot more of is pieces that just don't fit as well as MPP, a lot more greenstuff/paste/milliput work, and that kind of thing. But, really, not much different from the days of metal minis.

I really don't get the "it doesn't paint as well as plastic" either. After you wash and prime resin, it's very similar. And *way* better than metal.

Quite simply, to this date I have yet to see a Finecast model in the store that is in a condition that I would pay more than a Bones-level price for. And that's coming from 20 years of dealing with metal models. I very honestly would rather pay their exorbitant clampack HIPS model prices first.

I have not and will not ever buy a Finecast model from GW. The material is absolute crap. If it's not mis-molded and/or bent, it's so brittle that I can either point to pieces are outright broken in the package, or identify weapons and/or protrusions that I would make me fear to use the model in an actual game.

I have assembled and painted high-quality resin gaming models, and Finecast does not come anywhere close. HIPS is obviously the best, but nothing in my experience with metal models would make me want to tackle the problems with Finecast instead.

 AegisGrimm wrote:
Quite simply, to this date I have yet to see a Finecast model in the store that is in a condition that I would pay more than a Bones-level price for. And that's coming from 20 years of dealing with metal models. I very honestly would rather pay their exorbitant clampack HIPS model prices first.

I have not and will not ever buy a Finecast model from GW. The material is absolute crap. If it's not mis-molded and/or bent, it's so brittle that I can either point to pieces are outright broken in the package, or identify weapons and/or protrusions that I would make me fear to use the model in an actual game.

I have assembled and painted high-quality resin gaming models, and Finecast does not come anywhere close. HIPS is obviously the best, but nothing in my experience with metal models would make me want to tackle the problems with Finecast instead.

Wow, that's harsh. Since you've been in this for 20+ years and have worked with metal models, do you recall large size metal models, and how difficult they were to assemble and keep from breaking when you actually gamed with them? I mean, it took more hours to assemble a 30 piece dragon than it would to build, prep, paint, finish, play and retire of a resin model of today of comparable size.

There is the more practical issue of how you play the game without ever touching Finecast (if you actually play 40k). There aren't any factions that have *no* Finecast; I think Tau are the only playable faction if you remove all Finecast pieces (I think Ethereals are Finecast). Every other faction I can think of has either key heroes or core units (or both) that are Finecast.

Just picking randomly from my prep pile, here is a Grotesque partially assembled, and some Fire Dragons, brand new on the sprue. Both are Finecast, and I don't particularly see anything wrong that would make me scream and demand a refund.

I like some of the Finecast models I have, like my Warpspiders, but the rest are bad. My 25 year anniversary models are covered in defects and finecast is vary brittle on small pieces like my harlequin kisses, all of them have snapped off just looking at them.

 Icculus wrote:
Thats marketing stuff. They already made all of the Finecast so they still have to sell it all. So to call it finely details is just stating an opinion that will give you the impression that it is worth buying.

Always be wary when a product is advertised as something like that, particularly when they don't offer details.

For example, I semi-recently got a pair of keyboards that were advertized on the box as having a durable coating for the keys to make them wear-resistant. It wasn't a week before the paint had started coming off. Now 1/3-1/2 of the letter keys have so much paint missing that you wouldn't be able to tell which letter they are just by looking at the key. Fortunately I can touch-type.

Though I will admit that the same thing's happened to pretty much every keyboard I've used for a long time, and I do type rather hard.

On-topic, I have a few Finecast models, and the worst that's happened with them is some minor air bubbles (oddly enough, in the knuckles of two different Ork models). I thought they were great at first, because the parts stuck together easily. Then I got my first model that had been designed with Finecast in mind: Valkia from the WHFB Chaos Warriors range. I had significant issues getting her to go together, because although the material was extremely light, the model's design had tiny, tiny joints where the glue had to go. The wings provided exceptional difficulty, as they were large pieces that didn't join snugly with the torso. I eventually got her together by painting each half of the join with liquid green stuff and then applying superglue.

I think the early ones went together better because the models were designed with metal in mind, so they had broad joins that could take the weight of metal, and since Finecast is a lot lighter, the join's nice and secure.

Personally, I prefer plastic. It's easier to hack apart for conversions, goes together more easily with plastic glue (I use GW superglue for metal and finecast models because it's more convenient for me to get it, and I find it easy enough to peel off my skin (gently, while running it under a warm tap and applying soap and rubbing before scraping it off with a fingernail). Some of the superglues that were recommended to me... They seem like I'd need a doctor to get the skin apart, and I'm rather clumsy, so not getting it on my hands just isn't a realistic scenario.), and seems to be easier to paint. My metal minis keep getting chips and scratches in the paint jobs. My Scout Snipers from the early 00s look like they've been drybrushed with silver.

I bought a Haemy finecast to try it out and it sucked. Bubble on foot was fixable, but the model 'floats' on it's coat and cants at a 30 degree angle.
May try a heat gun on it, but I prefer plastic as it is easier to work with conversion-wise, and finecast models are too light - the plastic base weighs
more than the model. And I don't need the extra 'detail', plastic has enough detail for me. Never buying another finecast. I did trade for a set of finecast
Harlequins about a year ago before I bought the Haemy, and they appear OK, but I still haven't painted them which reflects my lack of thrill for the medium.
So-o-o pleased GW is going the plastic route on just about everything now - much better material to fool around with.

 ciaotym wrote:
I bought a Haemy finecast to try it out and it sucked. Bubble on foot was fixable, but the model 'floats' on it's coat and cants at a 30 degree angle.
May try a heat gun on it, but I prefer plastic as it is easier to work with conversion-wise, and finecast models are too light - the plastic base weighs
more than the model. And I don't need the extra 'detail', plastic has enough detail for me. Never buying another finecast. I did trade for a set of finecast
Harlequins about a year ago before I bought the Haemy, and they appear OK, but I still haven't painted them which reflects my lack of thrill for the medium.
So-o-o pleased GW is going the plastic route on just about everything now - much better material to fool around with.

There's no question that MPP on HIPS is the best medium for models, cost aside. Still, I think it's appropriate to respect that in the transition from metal to plastic, resin was a necessary intermediate step, and that GW's transition to MPP is going to happen over many, many years. Not all finecast models are alike, either. Some, like the Fire Dragons above, are essentially done just like metal models. Others, like the Grotesque, is done just like MPP. In the meantime, if you want to play with a particular model, you really have no choice.

Also, it's worth mentioning that Citadel MPP is far, far better than its competitors plastics (PVC and resin plastic composites or whatever you call them from PP is awful) -- so you're really comparing finecast against one of the best materials in the industry, certainly for fit and ease. Another way to put it is, is there a material other than HIPS that you like?

Remember too that once upon a time, not so long ago, every model that was multipart required extensive work to assemble, pieces had to be painstakingly and manually pinned, and gaps had to be filled and sculpted from epoxies like milliput. And, metal models often had difficult remediation. Finecast is actually a big improvement from that.

Talys wrote:
There's no question that MPP on HIPS is the best medium for models, cost aside.

I disagree with this. The best material for models is well-cast resin. You get better detail than plastic, assembling/converting/etc it is just as easy (and often easier), and the only drawback is that it tends to cost more (a fairly minor issue IMO since you get what you pay for). The problem with finecast isn't that it's resin, it's that it's extremely low-quality resin that's produced with poor methods and nonexistent quality control.

Talys wrote:
Both are Finecast, and I don't particularly see anything wrong that would make me scream and demand a refund.

There's nothing that would make me scream and demand a refund... if they cost half the price of what they do. But I can see lots of little bubbles on those Fire Dragons that stop them from being high quality models. There's bubbles on the helmet's jaw line (for lack of a better word) on each of them, there's bubbles on the back of the hands of 2 of them, all of them have bubbles on the guns themselves in various places. Things that might not bother me on cheap table top quality models that aren't intended to be viewed up close, but annoy the hell out of me on high end models (and GW prices them as high end models).

Peregrine wrote:

Talys wrote:
There's no question that MPP on HIPS is the best medium for models, cost aside.

I disagree with this. The best material for models is well-cast resin. You get better detail than plastic, assembling/converting/etc it is just as easy (and often easier), and the only drawback is that it tends to cost more (a fairly minor issue IMO since you get what you pay for). The problem with finecast isn't that it's resin, it's that it's extremely low-quality resin that's produced with poor methods and nonexistent quality control.

I've not had resin kits where all the pieces fit with the same precision as an MPP kit, and no matter what, they are more fragile (less drop resistant). In my opinion, plastic is easier to work with too. For example, if you were to make a Skyshield out of resin, gluing it together would be murder, since you can't use plastic cement. But whatever, to each their own.

Once upon a time, I think the detail argument could be made, but I don't think so anymore. Top notch HIPS models have just as much detail now -- if you compare GW resin kits that have gone plastic, I just can't imagine anyone choosing the resin. And, it's cool you can get a Thunderhawk in resin, but I bet most modelers would prefer it in MPP.

AllSeeingSkink wrote:

Talys wrote:
Both are Finecast, and I don't particularly see anything wrong that would make me scream and demand a refund.

There's nothing that would make me scream and demand a refund... if they cost half the price of what they do. But I can see lots of little bubbles on those Fire Dragons that stop them from being high quality models. There's bubbles on the helmet's jaw line (for lack of a better word) on each of them, there's bubbles on the back of the hands of 2 of them, all of them have bubbles on the guns themselves in various places. Things that might not bother me on cheap table top quality models that aren't intended to be viewed up close, but annoy the hell out of me on high end models (and GW prices them as high end models).

Those are easily cleaned up deficiencies, though, not unsolvable issues. As I said, if you compare them to older metal models, I don't think the prep time and finished model quality is all that different. And my point was really just, if you want a Fire Dragon or Grotesque, that's what's available; yes, I would prefer them both in HIPS and the Fire Dragons in multipart instead of single piece single pose, but as someone said before..... better than nothing if that's what you want to field.

Those models look pretty good painted and finished, by the way -- it just takes a little more work.

Talys wrote:

Peregrine wrote:

Talys wrote:
There's no question that MPP on HIPS is the best medium for models, cost aside.

I disagree with this. The best material for models is well-cast resin. You get better detail than plastic, assembling/converting/etc it is just as easy (and often easier), and the only drawback is that it tends to cost more (a fairly minor issue IMO since you get what you pay for). The problem with finecast isn't that it's resin, it's that it's extremely low-quality resin that's produced with poor methods and nonexistent quality control.

I've not had resin kits where all the pieces fit with the same precision as an MPP kit, and no matter what, they are more fragile (less drop resistant). In my opinion, plastic is easier to work with too. For example, if you were to make a Skyshield out of resin, gluing it together would be murder, since you can't use plastic cement. But whatever, to each their own.

Once upon a time, I think the detail argument could be made, but I don't think so anymore. Top notch HIPS models have just as much detail now -- if you compare GW resin kits that have gone plastic, I just can't imagine anyone choosing the resin. And, it's cool you can get a Thunderhawk in resin, but I bet most modelers would prefer it in MPP.

Then I'd humbly suggest you've not dealt with very many decent resin kits. Certainly, because of the nature of the process there's more room for human input and variance than with a HIPs kit, but there is nothing inherent to the process that means they go together less precisely. As for fragility? Perhaps, on some of the thinner pieces, but if the resin used is of the right mix, again, there's no reason thinner pieces of resin can't be almost as, if not just as, resilient. Plus you always have the ability to heat and reset bent components. If you want a demonstration of how tough resin can be, I suggest you drop a FW GUO body or Sicaran track unit on your foot, you'll be limping for days.

I also wouldn't subscribe to the theory that somehow poly cement is superior to super glue, it's just a different tool for working with a different material, and one only has to look within Forgeworld to see how large resin kits can get, and while I've yet to build any of their massive kits, I've certainly put together enough of the larger ones to conclude that while presenting a different modelling challenge, I don't think they're any more challenging than a large plastic kit.

I don't think you're right about detail either. Resin has a much greater resolution of detail than plastic, and people working in resin still seem to hand sculpt more frequently, at least in part, which, to me, gives many resin minis a greater soul than CAD plastic ones. That's drifting into the realms of subjectivity though, so here's an objective fact - plastics are still limited in their ability to do undercuts, so until a system that allows for that is developed, or enters wider use, you'll always be limited in what you can do in plastic vs resin.

Basically, Peregrine has the right of it. Normally, resin is awesome, FC is just gak resin.

Talys wrote:
Those models look pretty good painted and finished, by the way -- it just takes a little more work.

Of course, but not extra work that I expect to have to do when paying such a large premium, especially when you consider the metals that preceded them didn't have the same flaws (I have had flawed metals, but it's only been a couple out of probably a hundred or so models, not every single model like the FC ones). They aren't always easy to fix either, bubbles on the tips of spikes are quite fiddly to fix and my Commissar (one of only a few FC models I've bought) had the bubble right on his nose and also on the brim of his hat. Then you have the times when you think you got all the bubbles but when you're painting it you realise you missed some.

I don't consider that acceptable from a product that claims to be premium and is priced as such, which is why I said...

"There's nothing that would make me scream and demand a refund... if they cost half the price of what they do."


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 Azreal13 wrote:
Plus you always have the ability to heat and reset bent components

Bent stuff is one of the big problems I have with resin. You can rebend it, but some stuff is damned near impossible to get straight and even if you manage to get it straight down the track it's liable to go back to its old position.

Wow, that's harsh. Since you've been in this for 20+ years and have worked with metal models, do you recall large size metal models, and how difficult they were to assemble and keep from breaking when you actually gamed with them? I mean, it took more hours to assemble a 30 piece dragon than it would to build, prep, paint, finish, play and retire of a resin model of today of comparable size.

It may be harsh, but it's the truth as I see it. Even my wife, who is not into modeling but is familiar with the ins and outs of the hobby from years with me turned her nose up at Finecast when she saw it at the store. She was perusing blisters, and wondered if all the bent parts and pitting was normal. I know that from looking at what I can see in the blisters and trying to look through half a dozen of the same figure trying to find one that was acceptable, I would NEVER buy anything that is in a box, and thus unseen until it is opened.

There used to be several large models, usually ones with large bulky halves, that required putty work (stegadons, etc) but they never needed more putty work along the joins that I was not comfortable with. I admit that once in a while something like the Helcannon or the Thunderfire cannon was horrible to work with, but the benefit of the "old days" is that you learned to deal with metal in it's own way back then as it was the only thing out there. I have also never had a model fall apart during handling or gaming, but I also judiciously pin everything that looks like it would be fragile. Like the old High Elf serpentine dragons. Have assembled several of them and they are still going strong, even with some of the parts that were too small to be pinned. I have 5 metal Space Marine dreadnoughts versus 1 plastic one, spread across three armies and I love them all and they see as much use as anything plastic. I have entire squads of metal torso Imperial and Chaos Space Marines from back in the day, and yeah I scraped plenty of mould lines, but they are indestructible.

There is the more practical issue of how you play the game without ever touching Finecast (if you actually play 40k). There aren't any factions that have *no* Finecast; I think Tau are the only playable faction if you remove all Finecast pieces (I think Ethereals are Finecast). Every other faction I can think of has either key heroes or core units (or both) that are Finecast.

Not a problem if you have been in the game for a long time. Lots of my armies are from older editions, so while I do not have the latest and greatest models that are in Finecast, they are still fieldable, especially with conversions. Or they actually have the old metal versions before GW went to Finecast in the first place. For example, my Eldar army is the newest army I have been working on for just the last couple years, and everything is metal. All my Rangers and Aspect Warriors are metal that was bought off Ebay. Because I am not worried about a couple of days of sitting in Simple Green before painting, most of my units were bought for half (or less) of the cost of their Finecast counterparts. My squad of Dark Reapers that matches the Finecast ones cost me 15 dollars, and I have a squad of Wraithguard that never cost more than 10 dollars a model from back when they went over to Finecast but before plastics came out. I bought some metal Ork Nobs in mega armor, fully assembled and primed, for 10 dollars (each) at Gencon last summer from the Bits seller there. I sorted through some broken Finecast Wraithguard until I found a couple of mint condition metal ones.

Other than some obvious characters, there are always workarounds for Finecast units in 40K, because nearly all of the units used to have metal versions. And some of the characters, too.