Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/16 20:47:15
Subject: Would you allow these models to proxy as a female Farseer?
|
 |
Stealthy Dark Angels Scout with Shotgun
|
Been thinking of how to go about making a Lady Farseer.. But man, I haven't got the slighest clue with GS and all..
Conversion is too time taxing for me.. So how about proxying the model with something from WFB? Then just paint them according to the scheme of my force.
Something like...
Spellweaver with Staff ?
http://www.games-workshop.com/resources/catalog/product/600x620/99800204002_SpellweaverwithStaffNEW01.jpg
or
Alarielle the Radiant?
http://www.games-workshop.com/resources/catalog/product/600x620/99800210009_AlarielleRadiant01.jpg
Thoughts?
Any tips on proxies or conversions will be appreciated!
|
4000~
1000~ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/16 20:48:51
Subject: Would you allow these models to proxy as a female Farseer?
|
 |
Secret Inquisitorial Eldar Xenexecutor
|
Yes and Yes, assuming based correctly. They sufficiently fill the "Magic elf" vibe for Farseers enough for me.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/16 20:48:52
Subject: Would you allow these models to proxy as a female Farseer?
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
WA, USA
|
Easily. They'd work fine.
|
Ouze wrote:
Afterward, Curran killed a guy in the parking lot with a trident.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/16 20:49:17
Subject: Would you allow these models to proxy as a female Farseer?
|
 |
Thermo-Optical Hac Tao
|
The first would be really cool in an Exodite force.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/16 20:54:35
Subject: Would you allow these models to proxy as a female Farseer?
|
 |
Is 'Eavy Metal Calling?
|
Yes and yes. Seeing as I recently used an Elf for a Shadowseer conversion, I thoroughly approve!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/16 21:08:57
Subject: Would you allow these models to proxy as a female Farseer?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
Right size. Stick them on the right bases, go, you're good. Automatically Appended Next Post: (Though keep in mind that the Spellweaver is in Finecast and pretty much any bubbles utterly ruin the model, it might be worth looking for something sturdier)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/16 21:09:39
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/16 21:12:10
Subject: Would you allow these models to proxy as a female Farseer?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Sure. I like the high elf better than the wood elf, though either would be fine.
As for conversions, take that high elf one, rip off the head and stick a guardian/autarch/farseer head on there, and voila, 40k.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/16 21:14:42
Subject: Re:Would you allow these models to proxy as a female Farseer?
|
 |
Stealthy Dark Angels Scout with Shotgun
|
Wonderful! I'm happy to see that it's passable. Now I'm definitely getting it.
Will have to decide, though.
Spellweaver does look Exodite-y, but a bit cooler.
While the Alariella model.... looks more like a Spiritseer. Considering the shape of her staff.
Oh, and that Exodite theme sounds very interesting! I'll definitely check that out!
Might even take a jab at converting.
Hmm, follow-up question..
How about this model for a female Autarch?
Too Fantasy? I'd like to know what people think..
I honestly would proxy this, if the Heavy Aspect Armor of the Autarch didn't matter much..
As for the spear, it could be that unique item every Autarch carries around.
Thoughts?
Handmaiden of the Everqueen
http://www.games-workshop.com/en-WW/Handmaiden-of-the-Everqueen
Automatically Appended Next Post: Ailaros wrote:Sure. I like the high elf better than the wood elf, though either would be fine.
As for conversions, take that high elf one, rip off the head and stick a guardian/autarch/farseer head on there, and voila, 40k.
Aha! Will do so!
I'm sure the boxes will have plenty of options for heads. Hopefully symbols and insignia, too.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/16 21:16:17
4000~
1000~ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/16 21:19:19
Subject: Would you allow these models to proxy as a female Farseer?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I could see a handmaiden as an autarch. I couldn't see any of the elf wizard models as one, though. An autarch isn't about flowing robes and a magic stick. They're about armor and swords and guns. They should look more like a practical warrior than an ethereal sequencer of mana.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/16 21:22:44
Subject: Would you allow these models to proxy as a female Farseer?
|
 |
Stealthy Dark Angels Scout with Shotgun
|
Ailaros wrote:I could see a handmaiden as an autarch. I couldn't see any of the elf wizard models as one, though. An autarch isn't about flowing robes and a magic stick. They're about armor and swords and guns. They should look more like a practical warrior than an ethereal sequencer of mana.
Yes, I was asking about it to be a female Autarch. I'm glad you think so.
The robe-y wizards will probably serve my force as a Farseer and a Spiritseer.
Or just a Farseer with the High-Elf one, since the staff's already there.
|
4000~
1000~ |
|
 |
 |
|