Switch Theme:

Who is the guy in chains in this image? (Horus Heresy)  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel





Why Aye Ya Canny Dakkanaughts!

This is really annoying me, who is the guy to the right of Horus and left of Ahriman in the flaming chains?

Ghorros wrote:
The moral of the story: Don't park your Imperial Knight in a field of Gretchin carrying power tools.
 Marmatag wrote:
All the while, my opponent is furious, throwing his codex on the floor, trying to slash his wrists with safety scissors.
 
   
Made in gb
Blood Angel Neophyte Undergoing Surgeries




He's the Red Angel. A possessed Blood Angel apothecary first seen in the novel Fear to Tread. You can just about see the BA emblems on him.
   
Made in gb
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel





Why Aye Ya Canny Dakkanaughts!

Thanks.

Ghorros wrote:
The moral of the story: Don't park your Imperial Knight in a field of Gretchin carrying power tools.
 Marmatag wrote:
All the while, my opponent is furious, throwing his codex on the floor, trying to slash his wrists with safety scissors.
 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Which doesn't make too much sense, because "Red Angel" meant Angron prior to this new dumb series being written.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in us
Fiery Bright Wizard






Idaho

Stupid Ahriman making the TS looks like traitors

beyond that, yeah, the HH novels have a few stupid bits (red angel, the immortal cross-race best buddies that is the cabal, etc.)

I'll never be able to repay CA for making GW realize that The Old World was a cash cow, left to die in a field.  
   
Made in fr
Regular Dakkanaut




 DarknessEternal wrote:
Which doesn't make too much sense, because "Red Angel" meant Angron prior to this new dumb series being written.


Angron is still called the Red Angel in the HH books from time to time iirc, which makes it even more dumb.
   
Made in gb
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit





Actually that picture is from the Horus Heresy CCG circa 2002-2004, there was a close-up identifying that figure as The Red Angel in the artbooks (Book III/Compilation). I'm not aware of instance of Angron being called The Red Angel until the Horus Heresy novel series started several years later. (His epic daemon prince model was painted with red skin, but his description stated the red skin was a gift from Khorne)

Personally I think calling Angron the Red Angel - at least prior to his ascension to daemonhood - is dumb.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/03/17 16:31:25


 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




 DarknessEternal wrote:
Which doesn't make too much sense, because "Red Angel" meant Angron prior to this new dumb series being written.

I believe someone mentioned to the Red Angel than Angron wouldn't like his usurpation of the epithet. Not sure if anything has come of it yet.
   
Made in nl
Pragmatic Primus Commanding Cult Forces






 Brennonjw wrote:
Stupid Ahriman making the TS looks like traitors

They are traitors.

Error 404: Interesting signature not found

 
   
Made in us
Rotting Sorcerer of Nurgle






The Dog-house

 Iron_Captain wrote:
 Brennonjw wrote:
Stupid Ahriman making the TS looks like traitors

They are traitors.


Are they? Are the Alpha legion really traitors?

H.B.M.C.- The end hath come! From now on armies will only consist of Astorath, Land Speeder Storms and Soul Grinders!
War Kitten- Vanden, you just taunted the Dank Lord Ezra. Prepare for seven years of fighting reality...
koooaei- Emperor: I envy your nipplehorns. <Magnus goes red. Permanently>
Neronoxx- If our Dreadnought doesn't have sick scuplted abs, we riot.
Frazzled- I don't generally call anyone by a term other than "sir" "maam" "youn g lady" "young man" or " HEY bag!"
Ruin- It's official, we've ran out of things to talk about on Dakka. Close the site. We're done.
mrhappyface- "They're more what you'd call guidlines than actual rules" - Captain Roboute Barbosa
Steve steveson- To be clear, I'd sell you all out for a bottle of scotch and a mid priced hooker.
 
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka




 Tactical_Spam wrote:
 Iron_Captain wrote:
 Brennonjw wrote:
Stupid Ahriman making the TS looks like traitors

They are traitors.


Are they? Are the Alpha legion really traitors?

How did we get to the Alpha Legion?

tremere47-fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate, leads to triple riptide spam  
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





 Tactical_Spam wrote:
 Iron_Captain wrote:
 Brennonjw wrote:
Stupid Ahriman making the TS looks like traitors

They are traitors.


Are they? Are the Alpha legion really traitors?

Yes, and yes. Two simpler questions can't be asked about 40k background.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in us
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine




Massachusetts

 DarknessEternal wrote:
 Tactical_Spam wrote:
 Iron_Captain wrote:
 Brennonjw wrote:
Stupid Ahriman making the TS looks like traitors

They are traitors.


Are they? Are the Alpha legion really traitors?

Yes, and yes. Two simpler questions can't be asked about 40k background.


Yup, totally agree.
   
Made in gb
Hallowed Canoness





Between

The Thousand Sons aren't traitors, they were the ones who were betrayed.

By their Primarch, and then by the Space Wolves.



"That time I only loaded the cannon with powder. Next time, I will fill it with jewels and diamonds and they will cut you to shrebbons!" - Nogbad the Bad. 
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka




How did Space Wolves betray them?

tremere47-fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate, leads to triple riptide spam  
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





The Space Wolves never betrayed the Thousand Sons, that falls squarely on Horus. He's the one that told them to kill the Thousand Sons.

Also, Magnus ordered the Thousand Sons to stand idle and let the Wolves kill them because he had betrayed the Emperor. The Thousand Sons didn't follow that order. But they did commit whole-heartedly with Magnus' plan of "screw that, let's just join the daemons" plan afterwords.

I'm very confused how you find that last be to not be traitorous towards the Imperium.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in au
Wicked Ghast





Australia

pm713 wrote:
 Tactical_Spam wrote:
 Iron_Captain wrote:
 Brennonjw wrote:
Stupid Ahriman making the TS looks like traitors

They are traitors.


Are they? Are the Alpha legion really traitors?

How did we get to the Alpha Legion?

No-one expects the Spanish Inquisition!!

Nothing to see here, move along mortal.  
   
Made in ie
Norn Queen






Dublin, Ireland

Of more interest: What are they doing to him?

Dman137 wrote:
goobs is all you guys will ever be

By 1-irt: Still as long as Hissy keeps showing up this is one of the most entertaining threads ever.

"Feelin' goods, good enough". 
   
Made in us
Daring Dark Eldar Raider Rider





 DarknessEternal wrote:
The Space Wolves never betrayed the Thousand Sons, that falls squarely on Horus. He's the one that told them to kill the Thousand Sons.

Also, Magnus ordered the Thousand Sons to stand idle and let the Wolves kill them because he had betrayed the Emperor. The Thousand Sons didn't follow that order. But they did commit whole-heartedly with Magnus' plan of "screw that, let's just join the daemons" plan afterwords.

I'm very confused how you find that last be to not be traitorous towards the Imperium.


The wolves were under orders to return magnus to terra for censure. The scheming of Othere Wyrdmaker as well as Constantine Valdor saw to it that they attacked instead. So that in its own way forced the Thousand Sons hands.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Ratius wrote:
Of more interest: What are they doing to him?


He's a bound demon now that they use to confront Blood Angels in the hopes of turning them into Khorne berserkers.
Example- Horus Heresy book- "Battle of Molech"

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/03/17 23:15:19


 
   
Made in ie
Norn Queen






Dublin, Ireland

Havent read Molech - is this post Fear to Thread? Was he captuted in FtT?

Dman137 wrote:
goobs is all you guys will ever be

By 1-irt: Still as long as Hissy keeps showing up this is one of the most entertaining threads ever.

"Feelin' goods, good enough". 
   
Made in us
Daring Dark Eldar Raider Rider





 Ratius wrote:
Havent read Molech - is this post Fear to Thread? Was he captuted in FtT?

I haven't read fear to tread in awhile but I believe he was captured then I can't confirm but yes molech happens after fear to tread
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





 Blitzen the Solitaire wrote:

The wolves were under orders to return magnus to terra for censure. The scheming of Othere Wyrdmaker as well as Constantine Valdor saw to it that they attacked instead. So that in its own way forced the Thousand Sons hands.

Horus changed that order. That's the way it originally happened. That's still the way it happened in the HH series.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in us
Daring Dark Eldar Raider Rider





 DarknessEternal wrote:
 Blitzen the Solitaire wrote:

The wolves were under orders to return magnus to terra for censure. The scheming of Othere Wyrdmaker as well as Constantine Valdor saw to it that they attacked instead. So that in its own way forced the Thousand Sons hands.

Horus changed that order. That's the way it originally happened. That's still the way it happened in the HH series.


Hmmm i must of missed something from "Prospero Burns" when Russ tries to talk through Kasper Hawser to Magnus and tells him to bring his armies out and surrender to him.
   
Made in gr
Alluring Sorcerer of Slaanesh






Reading, UK

Here are some quotes in regards to the communication.

Nothing is mentioned in Prospero Burns about the actual order from Horus to destroy the Wolves rather than take them back to Terra.

The initial order

‘I see,’ said Horus, ‘and the Council’s concern is simply with Angron’s bloodlust?’ ‘Not entirely,’ he replied. ‘As I said, the Wolf of Fenris has been despatched to Prospero in order to bring Magnus back to Terra, though for what purpose I do not know.’ - Fulgrim Page 278


Horus has changed the order

"But what of Magnus?" asked Maloghurst urgently. "What happens when Leman Russ returns him to Terra?"

Horus smiled. "Calm yourself, Mal. I have already contacted my brother Russ and illuminated him with the full breadth of Magnus' treacherous use of daemonic spells and conjurations. He was... suitably angry, and I believe that I have convinced him that to return Magnus to Terra would be a waste of effort." - False Gods Page 405.


"He saw the honeyed words of Horus and the sinister urgings of Constantin Valdor, each spoken with very different purposes, but designed to sway Leman Russ towards a destination of total destruction." - A Thousand Sons, Page 535.


On the Red Angel, he's been a rather pointless character so far in my opinion and would have been better left as he was. A cool looking chained burning dude.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2016/03/18 13:35:29


No pity, no remorse, no shoes 
   
Made in gb
Courageous Space Marine Captain






Glasgow, Scotland

 Gashrog wrote:
Actually that picture is from the Horus Heresy CCG circa 2002-2004, there was a close-up identifying that figure as The Red Angel in the artbooks (Book III/Compilation). I'm not aware of instance of Angron being called The Red Angel until the Horus Heresy novel series started several years later. (His epic daemon prince model was painted with red skin, but his description stated the red skin was a gift from Khorne)

Personally I think calling Angron the Red Angel - at least prior to his ascension to daemonhood - is dumb.



Its a title referring to his killing ability, so brutal that its almost like he was gifted the skill by the gods. And red because the blood.

in Fear to Tread, when the Red Angel meets with Horus and Co., he declares himself "The Red Angel" and someone actually points out that Angron might take offence to that, to which he replies something like "So? I'm a Daemon-thing, bite me."


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Pilau Rice wrote:
Here are some quotes in regards to the communication.

Nothing is mentioned in Prospero Burns about the actual order from Horus to destroy the Wolves rather than take them back to Terra.

The initial order

‘I see,’ said Horus, ‘and the Council’s concern is simply with Angron’s bloodlust?’ ‘Not entirely,’ he replied. ‘As I said, the Wolf of Fenris has been despatched to Prospero in order to bring Magnus back to Terra, though for what purpose I do not know.’ - Fulgrim Page 278


Horus has changed the order

"But what of Magnus?" asked Maloghurst urgently. "What happens when Leman Russ returns him to Terra?"

Horus smiled. "Calm yourself, Mal. I have already contacted my brother Russ and illuminated him with the full breadth of Magnus' treacherous use of daemonic spells and conjurations. He was... suitably angry, and I believe that I have convinced him that to return Magnus to Terra would be a waste of effort." - False Gods Page 405.


"He saw the honeyed words of Horus and the sinister urgings of Constantin Valdor, each spoken with very different purposes, but designed to sway Leman Russ towards a destination of total destruction." - A Thousand Sons, Page 535.


On the Red Angel, he's been a rather pointless character so far in my opinion and would have been better left as he was. A cool looking chained burning dude.


He's a manifestation of the flaw. In Fear to Tread, the Apothecary (who is symbolic of the geneseed and the creation of the Astartes in his role) went into the glowing death-ball thing created by Ka'Bandha in his Primarch's stead, sacrificing himself so Sanguinius wouldn't, and gave over the geneseed he was carrying in his NArthecarium at the time. He is representation of the Bloodlust that echoed in the Warp and emerged as its own manifestation that day. Sanguinius was planning to sacrifice himself to stop the curse altogether until the Apothecary volunteered instead, but he only slowed it down.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/03/25 13:19:35


I'm celebrating 8 years on Dakka Dakka!
I started an Instagram! Follow me at Deadshot Miniatures!
DR:90+S++G+++M+B+IPw40k08#-D+++A+++/cwd363R+++T(Ot)DM+
Check out my Deathwatch story, Aftermath in the fiction section!

Credit to Castiel for banner. Thanks Cas!
 
   
Made in gb
Ruthless Interrogator





The hills above Belfast

pm713 wrote:
 Tactical_Spam wrote:
 Iron_Captain wrote:
 Brennonjw wrote:
Stupid Ahriman making the TS looks like traitors

They are traitors.


Are they? Are the Alpha legion really traitors?

How did we get to the Alpha Legion?


That's what we will all ask when the end comes.....

EAT - SLEEP - FARM - REPEAT  
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: